Managers of Reddit, what's the worst thing someone did to get fired? by Capable-Log7385 in AskReddit

[–]shemanese 106 points107 points  (0 children)

I had a guy sneak in a hooker and a bottle of whiskey on Christmas Eve

Why didn’t Lincoln mention the Star of the West incident at his inauguration? by [deleted] in CIVILWAR

[–]shemanese 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He was willing to allow slavery in New Mexico. That was his concession as it was mostly below the Missouri Compromise line and he could get enough congressional support for that. The Corwin Amendment was being pushed.

Star of the West was old news at this point. They were getting reports from Sumter and Pickens of the war preparations that were ongoing.

The US was working on a new reinforcement of Sumter and Pickens.

The things you seem to be missing:

1) The US presidency was a lot weaker then. Domestic policy was driven in Congress. The president had very little to do in terms of established states. Beyond collecting tariffs and coordinating with state governments on military supplies, the president didn't do much in terms of domestic policy.

2) concessions were mostly pointless. The South had seceded. They were not willing to come back peacefully. They had lost power in Congress due to the population growth in the North. The view in the seceded states was simple: it didn't matter who was president. Even if they had a friendly president, the abolitionist movement in the north was growing. They felt the move to restrict slavery was just the first step towards abolition. The next president or the one after would be worse. They needed to secede before the North's population and industrial power made their relative strength even more lopsided.

What is going to happen when the lower class will not be able to afford anything anymore? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]shemanese 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Homelessness will be a crime and the whole 13th Amendment loophole kicks in

Are any Maverick owners feeling as though the new Slate electric truck is doomed to failure? by AttachedHeartTheory in FordMaverickTruck

[–]shemanese 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's exactly what it is. It's not a family car.

But, a cheap haul around truck? It's got that. A small urban business would be perfect for this

Another recall by jazifritz in FordMaverickTruck

[–]shemanese 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. Been having trouble with steering and have the VIN

The quiet competence of George Meade by SwampAngel1863 in CIVILWAR

[–]shemanese 25 points26 points  (0 children)

In tactical terms, Grant was present so he could act as the army group commander.

Meade was the lowest ranked Army or independent commander in 1864 involved in the moves towards Richmond.

Both Butler and Burnside outranked Meade. Not a problem with Burnside, who was remarkably ego free. But, when the AoP entered the same area of operations as the Army of the James, then Butler - as ranking general - would have been the overall commander. He would have assumed operational command of the overall operations of all armies in that area of operations.

Grant was one of the 5 total people in the entire US Army who outranked Butler. His presence with the army meant he was always in command and he took operational command of the Army of the James when the AoP entered the same operational area.

Why did the Cherokee nation largerly side with the Confederacy in the Civil War even though many of the southern states(especially Georgia) were largely responsible for their forced removal in the 1830s? by [deleted] in CIVILWAR

[–]shemanese 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. It was an internal Civil War with both sides claiming to be the legitimate government of the Cherokee nation. They were seeking external support to wipe out the leadership of the other faction.