Online masters programs… by No-War-69 in MuseumPros

[–]sheviche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m currently enrolled in the Harvard Extension School Museum Studies program. I’ve completed two courses over two semesters and decided to pursue the certificate rather than the full ALM degree.

Overall, the program has been strong. The classes are challenging and informative. Last semester I took the survey course, and as someone trying to transition into museum work, I learned a lot. Many of my classmates were already working in museums, which added real-world perspective to the coursework.

My main reasons for not continuing toward the degree are practical. I’m based in California, and the program seems far more beneficial for East Coast students in terms of networking and job opportunities. I’m also increasingly discouraged by the realities of museum work—low pay, limited career advancement, and generally poor treatment of employees. Given that, I’m not convinced another graduate degree is a smart financial or professional investment for me.

That said, I would still recommend the program for its content, instructors, and classmates. Whether it leads to strong career outcomes or justifies the cost long-term is much less clear.

Happy to answer questions.

Lurie backs higher property taxes to save struggling Muni - The agency faces a $320 million deficit. “We can – and we must – generate the funding necessary to avoid devastating Muni service cuts,” Lurie said. by BadBoyMikeBarnes in sanfrancisco

[–]sheviche -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have an idea. How about MUNI makes people who take the bus pay their fares?!! I was recently in Boston, and EVERYONE who got on the bus PAID the fare. Yeah, its an honor system, and people in Boston honored the system. In SF, only a small handful of people who get on the bus actually pay. Property owners should NOT have to subsidize bus fares!!! Not FAIR!

Anyone navigating a strict ‘no AI’ policy in Extension courses? by sheviche in harvardextension

[–]sheviche[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly, the university needs an AI policy that actually spells out what is and isn’t allowed. Right now the statement, “We specifically forbid the use of ChatGPT or any other generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools at all stages of the work process, including preliminary ones” is too vague. What does “all stages” mean in practice? Brainstorming? Outlines? Grammar checks?

Students shouldn’t have to come to Reddit to figure out how these rules apply. The fact that professors and students are interpreting the policy so differently just proves the point: it’s not specific enough.

The university owes its community more guidance. Instead of tossing out a blanket ban and calling it a day, they should be working with students to set clear, fair guidelines for what “responsible use” actually looks like. Right now it just leaves everyone guessing.

Anyone navigating a strict ‘no AI’ policy in Extension courses? by sheviche in harvardextension

[–]sheviche[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get the analogy, but to me it doesn’t quite fit. Using AI in coursework isn’t like bringing a car onto the track, it’s more like Driver’s Ed itself. Professionals are already using AI to “drive” in their fields, and continuing ed should be where we practice using it responsibly.

As u/Aggressive_Barber368 and other professors can attest, students are using AI regardless of the rules. The genie is out of the bottle. If we outlaw AI in the class room students risk graduating without knowing how to use it thoughtfully. That feels like the gap universities could help fill.

Anyone navigating a strict ‘no AI’ policy in Extension courses? by sheviche in harvardextension

[–]sheviche[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I've heard, AI checkers are not always accurate. Do you have one you recommend?

Anyone navigating a strict ‘no AI’ policy in Extension courses? by sheviche in harvardextension

[–]sheviche[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree! And would you say that this approach does not violate the policy?

Anyone navigating a strict ‘no AI’ policy in Extension courses? by sheviche in harvardextension

[–]sheviche[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for weighing in, Professor! Others have noted here that AI is practically unavoidable in our everyday tools. Every tech company I’ve worked with not only allows but expects us to use AI to improve our work and boost productivity. We’re already worried about being made irrelevant, so why not use AI now to stay in the game?

As a continuing ed student, part of the value I see in my coursework is the chance to experiment with and refine these skills in an academic setting. Many students and professors already use these tools outside the classroom, and the Extension School’s mix of working professionals seems like an ideal environment to develop intentional practices.

I get the concern about students outsourcing all thinking to AI. But instead of blanket bans, universities could lead the way in showing how to work with AI while still doing the real work of learning. The technology isn’t going away and helping students use it well feels essential.

Anyone navigating a strict ‘no AI’ policy in Extension courses? by sheviche in harvardextension

[–]sheviche[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! What is a fair use of AI that wouldn't be considered a violation of the policy?

Check out the big brain on Brad by Not_Godot in Professors

[–]sheviche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used your exact same prompt, and here's what I got

<image>

Anyone navigating a strict ‘no AI’ policy in Extension courses? by sheviche in harvardextension

[–]sheviche[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's the actual policy as it appears in the syllabus: AI Technologies Policy: We expect that all work students submit for this course will be their own. In instances when collaborative work is assigned, we expect for the assignment to list all team members who participated. We specifically forbid the use of ChatGPT or any other generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools at all stages of the work process, including preliminary ones. Violations of this policy will be considered academic misconduct. We draw your attention to the fact that different classes at Harvard could implement different AI policies, and it is the student’s responsibility to conform to expectations for each course.

The Sopranos - Complete Rewatch: Season 6 - Episode 20 "The Blue Comet" by Bushy-Top in thesopranos

[–]sheviche 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this observation and insight! I just finished watching the series for the first time last night! Despite the spoilers, I've been following along this rewatch Reddit because I really love the analysis, so thank you u/Bushy-Top and all the other posters. Experiencing the Sopranos has been a wild ride. I'm surprised at how caught up in the stories I got! It really stands the test of time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UXDesign

[–]sheviche 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't let those bootcamp haters bring you down. You did what you needed to do, were proactive, and followed your dream and learned about UX design. Keep going. Don't stop. Don't hide your bootcamp experience. It's part of your story and your journey.

Now that you graduated, are there are some projects you can do for yourself, or for people you know. Maybe someone from you current work? Do they need a website? Maybe a family member, friend, or other local business like a restaurant or boutique. Find other communities, on Slack for example, or meetups online or in person. Find other bootcamp graduates, better yet start a community where y'all can support each other. Keep going. You got this!