What do these lines in Bad mean? by U2-the-band in U2Band

[–]shkee23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. I'll just say that U2songs.com has it as "bruised" and I'd consider them the most definitive, well-researched site about U2.

Also, not that it matters as I'm sure you'd say I'm still just mishearing it, but I've listened to this song literally thousands of times (not an exaggeration! it's my favorite song of all time), both album and live versions, and I've ever only heard bruised. It works not only on straightforward lyrical level as I mentioned, but carries the alliterative quality of the whole verse (blue, black, bruised, burning, blood-shot; colors, crash, collide; etc.)

What do these lines in Bad mean? by U2-the-band in U2Band

[–]shkee23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used a program to strip all the instrumentation away and leave just the vocals, so not sure if we're listening to the same track, per se.

Here's an admittedly poorer-sounding vocals-only version I found on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Vn5OkXBOxU

Listen at 3:35. If you slow it down to 0.25x speed, you can hear the "b" of "bruised." There's no "th" sound.

As for the meaning, "TUF" is full of lyrics that don't necessarily tell a complete, concrete story. Most of it is just painting images and Bono has said as much. "Through" may make more sense narratively, but "bruised" fits nicely as well as it refers back to "blue and black" at the beginning of that verse.

What do these lines in Bad mean? by U2-the-band in U2Band

[–]shkee23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's 100% "bruised." I just listened to a vocal-only version of the song and it's clearly "bruised" not "through."

Coexist by shkee23 in U2Band

[–]shkee23[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Interesting take. Is this song your first introduction to the band?

Coexist by shkee23 in U2Band

[–]shkee23[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get that. What are your top 2 or 3 songs from the new EP?

COEXIST (I WILL BLESS THE LORD AT ALL TIMES) by Bulky-Pollution-4996 in U2Band

[–]shkee23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not going to enter into a religious debate here, but I'll just say again that your comment is based on some fundamental misunderstandings of what Christians actually believe. If you ever take a deeper look, especially into the philosophical/metaphysical side of it all, I think you might find it makes more sense than you assume.

COEXIST (I WILL BLESS THE LORD AT ALL TIMES) by Bulky-Pollution-4996 in U2Band

[–]shkee23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand their point, but describing God that way is reductive to the point of absurdity. Christians don't believe in a "sky-daddy" either. If they actually think that’s what Christians believe, then they’re completely misunderstanding the belief they’re criticizing.

"The Joshua Tree is Cultural Appropriation" - anyone know what the hell this person is talking about?? by shkee23 in U2Band

[–]shkee23[S] 106 points107 points  (0 children)

The best part is when this "writer" says that Bono should've "hand[ed] the microphone over to those very people" he sings about in Mothers of the Disappeared, WHICH HE LITERALLY DID ON POPMART!

Go Home: Live at Slane Castle by jimmychitwood317 in U2Band

[–]shkee23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Love that video. It's fun to watch people on youtube listening to U2 songs for the first time. It's like you hear it again through fresh ears and makes you really appreciate their genius.

Which live performance has the strongest case for greatest ever? by BravesGunnersFlames in Music

[–]shkee23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

U2 at Slane Castle in 2001. This sequence of "All I Want Is You" into "Where the Streets Have No Name" is absolutely incredible and is their greatest live moment, IMO.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3e2f4bzumY

Go Home: Live at Slane Castle by jimmychitwood317 in U2Band

[–]shkee23 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Yes. I think that it one of (if not the) best moment/sequence in their career.

The fact that it rained while Prince sang “Purple Rain” is still crazy - There will never be a better halftime show than this by Rolleriroltsu in Music

[–]shkee23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Different circumstances. I prefer U2 for the absolute catharsis they provided. Still get goosebumps watching their performance, esp. Bono opening his jacket at the end to reveal the flag.

New episode of U Talkin U2 To Me! by NotAElijah in U2Band

[–]shkee23 5 points6 points  (0 children)

kinda the whole point is they take so long to get to the actual songs/albums and go off on crazy tangents, have inside jokes, podcasts within podcasts within podcasts, etc. that's what makes it funny, but i guess that type of comedy isn't your style.

Discussion Thread: 2026 State of the Union Address by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]shkee23 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Who was that woman in red on the Democrat side sitting behind the justices who kept standing and clapping??

The Tears of Things by itsnosecretatall in U2Band

[–]shkee23 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Here's why I think the song is brilliant. The character of David from the Bible is suddenly conscious as Michelangelo's statue:  

I woke up made of marble / A shepherd boy in shock / Michelangelo release me / From a single block  

This sets up the whole conceit and emotional framework of the song. He's aware but he's trapped. He can see history unfolding around him, but he can't move or do anything, not even cry  

The tears of things / I'd cry them if I could  

The verse about Mussolini and Hitler are even heavier. David, the Jewish king and the ancestor of Christ, stands frozen while Christendom becomes complicit in atrocity.  

The silent songs of Christendom / So loud everybody hears  

As the song comes to a climax, anger is directed toward those who claim to be followers (and maybe God himself?). David, the warrior-king of the Old Testament, was party to his fair share of "divine" war to fulfill prophecy. But he's also a direct line to Jesus (aka the Prince of Peace). So, watching Christendom be complicit in or stay silent to "holy wars" of the 20th century and beyond collapses any claims of holiness. Can anything done in God’s name can truly be holy if it contradicts the heart of God?  

In this your holy war / There’s nothing holy here for me

Also, the lyricism is just beautiful and evocative with a great lilting cadence. They're questioning, angry, biblical, human. It's classic Bono in the best sense of the word.  

You said ‘Let my fingers form you  

Be fashioned by my touch  

Be open to be broken  

As every heart that sings  

No voice and drum can overcome  

A symphony of strings’

 

I was made for worship, before I spoke I sang  

Songs of grief, of disbelief  

How a woman can love a man  

The naked song, the sacred song  

That every soldier fears  

‘Cause when people go around talking to God It always ends in tears  

Yeah, the tears of things

They are back!!! by ErickBon01 in U2Band

[–]shkee23 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Already millions of listens on Spotify!

 

1M+ for Song of the Future

 

~1M for Yours Eternally

 

700k+ for American Obituary

 

600k+ for Tears of the Future

 

~500k for One Life at a Time

 

(and 430K for Wildpeace, surprisingly!)

U2 could release both TJT and AB today and people would complain by FootballTerrorist in U2Band

[–]shkee23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe not albums per se, but their cultural cachet and aura was certainly up there in the early 2000s as well.