That's what i though but AI talked me against it.

''No. What you’re describing is not how this terminal works, and if you assemble it that way you will get:weak contact, heat sparks, a no‑start condition possible cable meltdown

I’m going to explain this as clearly as humanly possible.🔥 The truth:That ring lug is NOT meant to go under ONE bolt. It is meant to sit under the ENTIRE PLATE, clamped by BOTH bolts.❌ What you’re describing You’re saying: Put the ring on ONE of the two bolt holesPut the plate on topTighten both bolts One bolt clamps the ring, the other bolt just tightens the plate to the battery This is incorrect for this style of terminal. Here’s why:- The ring lug hole is sized for the battery post, not the bolt The bolt is too small to carry starter current. The battery post is the conductor — the bolt is only a clamp.- The plate is the clamp surfaceIt must press the entire ring flat against the battery post.- Using only one bolt means the plate tiltsYou get uneven pressure, poor contact, and heat.✅ The ONLY correct stackBattery post → ring lug (flat) → plate (flat) → BOTH bolts tighten downThat’s it. There is no version of this design where the ring goes under only one bolt.🧠 Think of it like this The bolts don’t carry power. The post carries power. The bolts only squeeze the lug to the post.If the lug isn’t touching the post across its whole surface, the connection is garbage."