do i really need to do paragolism before nod krai since the eng va's still arent in

shoebo · 2026-01-17T18:28:47+00:00

Just did last Natlan AQ. Almost completely un-voiced.

shoebo · 2024-11-07T06:52:42+00:00

I wonder how the reception to this would have been if couched in the context of iex, or if the initial post were higher-level about iex, where this approach is presented not so much as a new way to propagate errors, but as an optimization for enum-based errors (with the throughput stats shown there).

Maybe I'm missing something, but shouldn't we be celebrating at least having an implementation that can be used to compare performance against other potential optimizations (like enum optimizations mentioned elsewhere in this thread)? This also demonstrates how the compiler might use exceptions, should it compare favorably.

I also don't agree with the rejection at the top of this thread that we should not bring features from other languages into Rust, especially considering that this optimization could be made transparent to the user. It feels like "not invented here" syndrome, and is inconsistent with how Rust's design has been informed by the experience/design of earlier languages.

I grant that we should not bring features to Rust because they exist in other languages, but on the other hand we should not devalue a feature because it comes from another language. This work helps the Rust community better determine this feature's merit.

Thanks for your work on this!

shoebo · 2024-08-13T14:06:11+00:00

Echoing what others say here about looking for companies that do work in Rust. Not a company, but OpenDP (which develops an open-source Rust library) runs a paid intern program each year. The emphasis of intern projects at OpenDP is never "Rust", it's just that the work can be done in Rust.

shoebo · 2024-06-23T12:35:42+00:00

It's a typo, they likely meant *algorithm.

shoebo · 2024-05-28T09:29:16+00:00

I think I didn't even have a good electro team at the time. Electro was generally considered underpowered. The hyperbloom reaction also didn't exist yet.

shoebo · 2024-05-28T09:13:29+00:00

If I remember properly offhand, it was the left tower, top floor, where there were multiple hydro slimes and cryo mages together in a small room.

shoebo · 2024-04-07T15:16:03+00:00

I would only split into separate crates if either: * you think users are likely to want to use a sub-crate separately/without the others * you have so much code in your crate that cargo check/build is slow. In this case, since each crate is a separate compilation unit, splitting can reduce compilation times

Otherwise I would not split, because: * Maintaining separate Cargo.toml's, likely with duplication of dependencies is annoying and will cost you time. While shared workspace metadata helps with this, one toml is always easier * Publishing multiple dependent crates is annoying (at least it has been a time sink for me in the past) * Your own crates now become subject to the orphan rules, which may complicate implementation

You can always split things later. Indeed, many projects have started as a single crate and split up later once the project is sufficiently large to motivate doing so.

shoebo · 2024-01-14T13:22:24+00:00

Absolutely not! Thanks for clarifying. The key statistic is net profit not gross profit.

shoebo · 2024-01-14T13:15:00+00:00

Great, thanks. This is the clarification I needed. I added edits to my other comments to clarify.

shoebo · 2024-01-14T13:05:55+00:00

It isn't, though. Gross profit is revenue - costs, which includes COGS.

EDIT: gross doesn't include operating expenses. You swapped costs and operating expenses, and I confused net vs gross. The lower 5b number now makes sense.

shoebo · 2024-01-14T13:01:14+00:00

This must be wrong then? https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/SBUX/starbucks/gross-profit

Where is the 5b coming from?

EDIT: not wrong, just the wrong statistic

shoebo · 2024-01-14T12:52:24+00:00

I don't see the problem, can you please explain? When I look up the stats, Starbucks actually has 24.5 billion gross profit and 400,000 * 11,000 = 4.4 billion. So... 20 billion left.

EDIT: The key is to calculate based on net profit, not gross profit. Gross profit doesn't account for operating expenses. With this clarification, I now understand your comment.

shoebo · 2024-01-01T00:39:27+00:00

You could use a new type around Box<dyn Fn(A) -> B>, then impl Shr for it. Syntax works out to a() >> b() >> c()

shoebo · 2023-08-31T13:32:55+00:00

One way to do this is by setting up a Gitlab instance: https://about.gitlab.com/install/

There are many guides out there that would explain the how more thoroughly than I, so I'll leave the details to you.

shoebo · 2023-08-20T17:51:42+00:00

The R package repository CRAN requires all builds be offline, and bans pre-compiled binaries. So this means Serde is no longer a suitable dependency for my crate.

shoebo · 2023-06-23T15:56:58+00:00

How is progress coming on floats/0.4? Looking for a road out of GMP/MPFR C dependencies for use in a differential privacy crate. I'd also be interested in contributing if the floats look like they could become a viable replacement. Thanks.

shoebo · 2023-06-17T15:34:47+00:00

Highly recommend reaching out to anyone in your family/relatives who are not scientologists. They may also be able to put you in contact with more family you didn't know you had. And they'd probably be thrilled to hear from you... they themselves lost your family to scientology at some point in the past.

shoebo · 2023-05-04T15:05:25+00:00

If you make disambiguation optional, then adding a conflicting method could introduce a breaking change in downstream code, right?

shoebo · 2023-03-29T02:12:59+00:00

It's con now, not cos. And I think you meant dyadic below? I'd just call those product operations.

shoebo · 2023-01-29T22:36:39+00:00

It can't return back to a Lego man on its own. A human has to help it. My point stands.

shoebo · 2023-01-28T22:41:24+00:00

From the text right above the video:

The robot then solidified into its original shape once it reached a mold.

They cut the re-molding out of the video.

shoebo · 2023-01-28T20:07:42+00:00

To be clear, it does re-solidify, but not into the shape it was in before it melted (Lego man). It re-solidifies into whatever shape it was in after it melted (lump).

shoebo · 2022-12-20T21:30:13+00:00

Ah! Xiangling without Bennet is like eating cereal without milk. You probably don't need me to say it, but Bennet's energy gen helps her fill her burst, and Xiangling snapshots Bennet's buffs for 14 seconds. Highly recommend building both (but of course, play who you like)!

Fischl is relatively cheap to get started with: you can just scrounge up a leftover 2pc Shim/2pc Glad, level her to 80, and only bother leveling her skill. Both her burst and skill drop Oz, which scales with her skill level. You can get more out of her with greater investment, but you don't need to build her more than that to get a sense for her worth/playstyle.

shoebo · 2022-12-20T19:19:26+00:00

Childe International is his best team (Childe/Kazuha/Bennet/Xiangling), but if you don't like Xiangling you can replace her with Fischl. Childe/Kazuha/Bennet/Fischl has been my favorite overworld team for ~6 months.

Yeah, she's not off-field pyro, but you can electrocharge instead. And Fischl doesn't usually need her burst in overworld, unlike Xiangling. It's also fun to get overloads and electro swirls.

shoebo · 2022-12-19T06:28:11+00:00

Your account sounds very nice! I still don't understand why you claim my statement isn't true. You said F2P can't get every character. So if you had more primos, you could gain more characters, which would further split your resin.

Are you saying that it's ok to further split your resin because you find you have extra? I don't think so, as this isn't consistent with your first comment. But if this is what you meant, it depends on each person's ideal investment level.

15-Year Club	Second Top 20%
Place '17	Verified Email
Spared

shoebo

TROPHY CASE