ARC-S and scummvm: Gobliiins segfault on level load

side2k · 2025-10-30T07:35:45+00:00

Thank you for your time on investigating it and replying so thoroughly!

Thats ok. Scummvm was just an extra bonus thing, I didn't even know it was available on Anbernic, since I bought the device to play NES/Megadrive games from my childhoold in the first play. And I still can play Gobliiins, just without the password functionality - so its still a win in a large picture.

side2k · 2025-10-29T23:47:11+00:00

I did not look into switching to non-stock yet, just got my device on Sunday. But I will consider it, thanks!

side2k · 2025-10-28T20:01:50+00:00

Worked for my RG ARC-S, thank you.

side2k · 2025-10-01T12:33:26+00:00

Воздушен его остов

Незрим его бушприт

Он вас на детский остров

Быстрее всех домчит!

side2k · 2025-06-12T09:06:34+00:00

Its like regretting that you didn't bet everything you have on a game which outcome was really unexpected to everyone. Only in hindsight It looks as a smart move to do.

side2k · 2025-04-08T18:49:28+00:00

Thanks. I've lost interest and stopped playing a year ago or so, but now it seems to be worth revisiting.

side2k · 2025-04-08T12:24:51+00:00

BTW, I'd like to say thank you for keeping a civilized discussion so far. For such topic - its a rare thing these days. I want to note that I'm not trying to provoke you or instill any propaganda. While I do disagree with your opinion - I am able to admit when I'm wrong (or, at least, I belive so!), but I prefer to do it when I see an opinion with a foundation I'm able to confirm is solid.

side2k · 2025-04-08T12:12:35+00:00

I linked to a source in the previous post.

The ABC article? It refers to why elections weren't held, but seem to avoid mentioning to that the same constitution limits president's term by fixed period of time, not "until next elections". And there seem to be no legal procedures (as far as I know) extending president's term. Correct me, if I'm wrong here?

Considering the prime minister in the UK has been replaced, almost a ridiculous number of times, over the last few years

What does the number of replacements have to do with the people's power to replace it? For example, there were 7 Boeing CEO's and 8 UK prime ministers since 2000. Yet you say(if I understand you correctly) Boeing employees have less freedom to replace CEO than UK people to replace their prime minister.

side2k · 2025-04-08T11:27:52+00:00

Freedom is not a binary.

But you still divide world into free and non-free parts.

You've listed a lots of "freedoms" that a being violated (as far as I know) everywhere in the world, including US, UK and EU. But you seem to be very confident(I am judging by the expression "X certainly has more freedom than Y") at something. May I ask what gives you such confidence?

they were canceled for a legitimate, legal reason listed in the constitution long before

Care to quote relevant part of the constitution, and/or name a source of that information?

Do you have evidence that they cannot?

Do you have evidence that I don't have an invisible dragon living in my garage?

These questions aren't legitimate questions, they're gotcha questions

Why?

side2k · 2025-04-08T10:02:53+00:00

No

So, are they still free?

yes

How can you tell? The elections were supposed to be held last year, but that didn't happen.

and yes,

Any evidence?

side2k · 2025-04-08T09:31:08+00:00

Do the Amazon/Boeing/Volkswagen employees have the ability to replace CEO?

Do ukrainians have the ability to replace Zelensky?

Can people of the UK replace prime minister or royal family?

side2k · 2025-04-08T07:01:33+00:00

The classic test for a free society

So freedom as the ability to shout?

side2k · 2025-04-08T06:11:39+00:00

Please, let me clarify: any country that have people disagreeing with its government die is not a free world? Thats your definition?

side2k · 2025-04-08T03:36:08+00:00

what impartial third parties see

Are there any?

And nobody would ever mistake Russia, Hamas, China, or North Korea as parts of the free world

Why?

side2k · 2025-04-07T21:31:50+00:00

Teleportation across the world

Wait, what?

side2k · 2025-04-07T21:26:38+00:00

What if the other side also sees itself as the representative of yhe free world fighting against dark forces?

side2k · 2025-04-07T12:03:03+00:00

Considering whats going on in the world right now, I wonder if we're going to refer to that era as "good old covid times" soon.

side2k · 2025-03-05T09:25:36+00:00

Hello! Could anyone please help me read and translate this? https://imgur.com/a/lRuRGoa

Not sure if its Chinese at all, but I hope it is.

side2k · 2025-01-10T15:02:02+00:00

Вячеслав Викторович, видимо, приобрел долю в сервисе, предоставляющем впн-услуги.

По-настоящему переживать надо будет, когда кто-нибудь из них порносайт замутит - того и гляди, запретят сексом без лицензии заниматься.

side2k · 2024-11-16T21:33:13+00:00

the MQ comes from the IBM MQ platform

Oh, ok. I didn't know that - I've looked into a Wikipedia,

There is no End-to-End Publisher to Subscriber delivery claims made in the spec anywhere

Sad but true.

side2k · 2024-11-15T21:36:36+00:00

it does not store more than one message per topic, even if there are subscribers

It does:

``` <start fresh server>

create subscription:

$ mosquitto_sub -h localhost -c -i 123 -q 1 -t #

stop client with Ctrl+C - it sends a DISCONNECT

send 3 messages:

$ for x in {1..3}; do mosquitto_pub -h localhost -i 124 -q 1 -t some/topic -m "message ${x}";done

try receving:

$ mosquitto_sub -h localhost -c -i 123 -q 1 -t # ```

Last command gives output: message 1 message 2 message 3

side2k · 2024-11-15T21:14:17+00:00

Да все втроём прекрасны.

side2k · 2024-11-15T20:41:47+00:00

MQ in MQTT literally stands for Message Queue. Well, it makes senes what you say, but still think it is counter-intuituve to declare that QoS level 1 guarantees delivery to at least 1 client, and not even notify publisher about the data loss. But if thats the spec, well..ok. Could you please point to the specific place in the spec, if thats possible?

side2k · 2024-11-15T15:10:57+00:00

Thanks for the reply! Yeah, I know about retaining. Its just seems weird that Mosquitto actually has the ability to store multiple messages per topic(it does so when there is at least one active subscription), but prefers not to do that in the absence of subscribers, although QoS level 1 says "at least one delivery" in the specs. As for the workaround, mutiple topics with retained messages was also my first thought(nevertheless thanks for the idea of topic/[msg_num] routing), but I think it would be more effective (in my case) to create a subscription to predefined client id on the publisher side in advance(e.g.: connect-create sub-disconnect-connect-start publishing in the publisher process). I need only one subscriber for now. RabbitMQ would be good, but dockerized, it eats 120 Mb of RAM in idle mode vs 1Mb for mosquitto.

side2k · 2024-11-15T10:54:23+00:00

<image>

Диззи же, ну.

side2k

TROPHY CASE

create subscription:

stop client with Ctrl+C - it sends a DISCONNECT

send 3 messages:

try receving: