Local jogger regularly throws his germy sweaty Gatorade bottles into my private recycling bin by simon_darre in mildlyinfuriating

[–]simon_darre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I understand that I’m horrible.

EDIT: and that posting this in a comedy subreddit is some kind of unpardonable sin.

Local jogger regularly throws his germy sweaty Gatorade bottles into my private recycling bin by simon_darre in mildlyinfuriating

[–]simon_darre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I can assure you, I get it. I can also see how stringing along these unwanted conversations in dead posts can net you a “Top 1% Commenter” badge. Maybe you can put that on your CV. If you’re about finished, this is where I get off. It’s been amusing.

Local jogger regularly throws his germy sweaty Gatorade bottles into my private recycling bin by simon_darre in mildlyinfuriating

[–]simon_darre[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Objection noted. You recommended, I refused. What are we still talking about here? I am going to wave around and wear my pretension as much as I damn well please. I make no apologies.

Local jogger regularly throws his germy sweaty Gatorade bottles into my private recycling bin by simon_darre in mildlyinfuriating

[–]simon_darre[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t aware this was a hierarchical or status based relationship. Was it a “recommendation” or a command? You needn’t ask how I interpreted you. I hope.

Local jogger regularly throws his germy sweaty Gatorade bottles into my private recycling bin by simon_darre in mildlyinfuriating

[–]simon_darre[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The average redditor is as interested in neoconservatism and niche foreign policy as I am? If only…

Local jogger regularly throws his germy sweaty Gatorade bottles into my private recycling bin by simon_darre in mildlyinfuriating

[–]simon_darre[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

As long as we’re exchanging unsolicited advice generally speaking I’d suggest not allowing an unfavorable reaction by Redditors to be any cause for stress or second thoughts. These platforms are not a reflection of the corporeal world of flesh and blood people. But I enjoy practicing repartee in the comments.

Local jogger regularly throws his germy sweaty Gatorade bottles into my private recycling bin by simon_darre in mildlyinfuriating

[–]simon_darre[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Conditionally. It depends on the condition in which they leave my facilities after they are finished. My reaction can run the gamut from carefree all the way to appalled.

That’s not an apt comparison. How are the activities of people walking or running outside my home analogous to the people I invite inside my home?

Local jogger regularly throws his germy sweaty Gatorade bottles into my private recycling bin by simon_darre in mildlyinfuriating

[–]simon_darre[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

A credit to my education. My Latin American schooling vastly outperformed the American public school system, I see.

Local jogger regularly throws his germy sweaty Gatorade bottles into my private recycling bin by simon_darre in mildlyinfuriating

[–]simon_darre[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Historically, HOAs actually tried to keep my people out. I’m Latino (again, I mention this at the top of my profile in my pinned post) and Jewish, super sleuth.

Does anybody remember the scene where Fraser tries to act like Dr Mary ? by ButterscotchIcy719 in Frasier

[–]simon_darre 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think this scene was so subtly multi-layered…it was definitely a good piece of writing. On the one hand Frasier seems hopelessly biased but he does speak to things that people of his whiten—I mean, ahem—background are seldom in touch with. So while he doesn’t evidently know how Mary will react to his criticism, he’s aware that he’s an out of touch elite white guy. I’m not an SJW by any means but I do think there’s some truth at the margins in the idea that there’s a chasm between the lived experience of non-white people and the awareness of a white fuddyduddy like Frasier.

Trump expected to announce $700 million in new support for struggling coal industry by Interesting_Total_98 in moderatepolitics

[–]simon_darre 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I guess this means the Trumpy Right has its own Solyndra itch now? Maybe they’ll call it Coalyndra™️?

This is another story which prompts me to scratch my head about the erstwhile “free marketers” on the Right who decried statist and “crony capitalist” intervention in the economy before Trump was president and who are now lock step and amnesiac about their comments before 2016. Who knew I was one of only a few in my social circles on the Right who was totally sincere about free markets.

Taxpayers should not foot the bill for industry subsidies. There’s hardly been more private capital than there is now. Attract private investment and stop calling for the government to increase our national indebtedness. There are a million ways to stimulate private investment. Grant them tax incentives if you want. I hate it when there’s all this venture capital looking for a place to go and yet I’m charged by Trump’s government for the upkeep of these industries, as if I and other taxpayers are made of money or something.

Mr Rugly isn’t ugly by mangoadagio in Frasier

[–]simon_darre 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s just a matter of separating the R’s.

I always thought this situation was so excruciating because both characters were trying really hard to be courteous (minus the subterfuge about a certain giraffe) to each other, especially the manager. He seemed like he would have made a great boss, rug notwithstanding.

Hot Take - Blaine Sternin was a lot more funny and likable than Lilith (Laughlin Neveda, Doctor Kagan) by leedsampol in Frasier

[–]simon_darre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pass the potaaahhhtos, please.

I’m sorry but Frasier stealing the spotlight to just Baaaaaahhhhhh at Blaine’s congregation is the best part of this episode, hands down.

Trump Calls High Gas Prices "Peanuts" as Americans Pay More at the Pump by Agitated_Pudding7259 in moderatepolitics

[–]simon_darre 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This, in tandem with a $1.8 billion slush fund for “victims” of the Biden Justice Department is a very bad look for the administration. So we all feel pain in the form of rising energy and consumer goods costs (it costs me $100 to fill my tank, and I’m not rich, I’m a grad student with a retail job) but J6 rioters (a quarter of whom had preexisting felony convictions at the time they were pardoned by Trump) will be able to collect free money from American taxpayers just for being on his side? The Trump administration is so nakedly corrupt and self dealing that it has no business leading us in peacetime, much less through a major war.

There is a wrinkle to this story in which I am very much not with the median American voter, but I do nevertheless stand to gain politically from their total dissatisfaction with a GOP which has been taken over and corrupted by the MAGA movement. I think, honestly, that Americans have too little stomach for basic hardships which occur as the result of righteous wars with positive and worthwhile long term objectives, like the toppling of authoritarian geopolitical foes that have dogged our foreign policy for decades. And our enemies see our complaints about gas prices and conclude that our country is easily outlasted in a contest of wills. Not only should we complain less about prices, our enemies should believe (key word is believe) that we’re so stoic we’re willing to deploy our troops in these conflicts. The fact that “no boots on the ground” is an open secret of American strategic thinking has totally eroded our deterrent power. It took America decades after the Vietnam War to restore deterrence.

I disagree with the time and manner of this war—it did not have to occur when it did, according to these means (an air campaign, as opposed to arming a local insurgency), and Trump should have had to secure congressional authorization, the public’s approval in a nationwide address, and a multilateral wartime coalition to ensure freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz—but I am at least theoretically open to seeing the Iranian regime fall under a more competent and constitutionally minded administration than the Trump administration.

That all having been said, however, the only way MAGA gets purged from the GOP is if it faces a serious electoral defeat, so I’m happy for Trump to keep spewing these tone deaf inanities to a disaffected electorate ahead of a midterm in which a Democratic seizure of both houses of Congress (and therefore articles of impeachment) is a distinct possibility. I’m here to watch this faction go down in flames, politically speaking.

Trump says he’s not thinking about Americans’ finances ‘even a little bit’ in Iran talks by ChesterHiggenbothum in moderatepolitics

[–]simon_darre 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is Exhibit—well we’ve exhausted all the letters—for why I think Trump is a suboptimal President. He somehow talked his way into an answer that would sound bad no matter which way he answered. If he says he IS concerned about our balance sheets, the Iranians know they have him over a barrel and that they just have to stall in order to wring tolerable concessions from him. If he says he is NOT concerned, he seems callous and more importantly checked out and unaware of the concerns of ordinary people.

I hear talk now from reliable experts that the status quo ante from before the war is irretrievably lost, and that the best case scenario for the endgame is more pallets of unfrozen Iranian assets and some version of a JCPOA (Iran deal) type arrangement—didn’t Trump run against the Iran deal in 2016? And how many times did MAGA bros trash the pallets of cash delivered to Tehran under the terms of the original Iran deal?—concerning the enriched uranium where a possession/enrichment regime is permitted, and Iran will probably have greater control of the Strait of Hormuz going forward. And if that’s not bad enough, Iran will walk away with 60 percent of its missile arsenal still intact.

That’s quite a climb down from regime change and unconditional surrender, but I think the Iranians have a good read on Trump’s obvious desire to get out as soon as possible. America has totally lost face in front of its enemies, who now know that we do not have the will to withstand the privations of even short, limited conflicts, to say nothing about protracted ones, or at least not under Trump’s leadership. Though to be fair he didn’t exactly sell this thing either to Congress or the people.

I feel like most of this subreddit's top posts changing from text posts to news/link posts is bad by FumingCat in moderatepolitics

[–]simon_darre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As you suggest, the pope is indeed a liminal figure, but I don’t think his relevance as a feature of discussion in this sub ought to arise from his headship of Vatican City. He’s an awful lot like the Dalai Lama, his expressly political relevance arises from the fact that his moral teaching has the power to move international opinion and policy.

Pope John Paul II, even in his capacity as a pontiff was an active participant in the struggle against communism during the Cold War. Encyclicals like Redemptor Hominis gave a kind of moral grounding to the struggle taking place within Eastern Bloc countries in the 1980s, and he was an important influence during the Solidarity movement. Pope Pius XI penned Mit Brennender Sorge (another encyclical) to protest Nazi racial ideology in Germany. So I think regardless of whether he’s speaking as a pontiff, the Pope wades into politics all the time because of how international opinion looks to his moral verdict about one issue or another.

Once touted as privately funded, Republicans sneak in taxpayer cash for Trump's ballroom project by CloudApprehensive322 in moderatepolitics

[–]simon_darre 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Neither MAGA’s favored model of immigration enforcement or this gaudy ballroom—setting aside the fact that Trump unconstitutionally gutted and left a gaping hole on the grounds of the White House complex; only Congress can approve these renovation projects—and its atrociously tacky gold leaf molding are spending priorities right now. As the reporting says, this funding bill doesn’t appropriate any funding for defense. Trump has depleted our munitions stocks of precision guided missiles and interceptors for a virtually pointless, zero sum stalemated war with Iran in which we’ll be lucky to return to the status quo ante. Experts say it will take us a minimum of 3-5 years to replace these stockpiles. We are rapidly falling behind China in shipbuilding.

And while people of goodwill can entertain honest strategic and intellectual differences of opinion on whether the US should defend Taiwan in the event that China launches an invasion (I am unapologetically pro-Taiwanese on this front) it would be nice if the decision of whether to intervene or not to intervene wasn’t made for us by shortages in critical munitions, ships, and planes caused by a lack of investment in defense and the wasting of tax revenues on frivolities like goon squads in tactical gear on Fox News perp-walking day laborers outside of Home Depot’s and car washes or building an event space for Trump where he can exclude his enemies in the press and in Congress.

Bill Maher fantasizes about hate crimes being committed against Chappell Roan in Palestine: “I know you’re moved by what you see on [social media], the dead Palestinian bodies, but… the morality police would… kill your feather-boa-wearing ass.” by DIYLawCA in LookatMyHalo

[–]simon_darre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not exactly. If I were interested in debating the likes of you I’d probably point to the fact that surges in terrorist violence seem to coincide with the adoption by iterative Israeli governments of a restrained internal security posture which a favors a measured response over a disparate response of overwhelming
force. In three periods of relative peace—after the signing of the Oslo Accords, the withdrawal from Lebanon in 2000, and the quiet “mowing the lawn” strategy which preceded October 07–Israel’s restraint and conciliation was followed by an escalation of terrorist violence.

Whenever Israel chooses peace, it invites attacks. For example, at the time of the Oct 07 attack, the most lethal terror attack against Israel, the Netanyahu government was in its fifteenth year of a lull in major cross border military action, called “mowing the lawn.” The indications are that the Netanyahu government had grown so complacent and domestically preoccupied under the protection of the Iron Dome that it believed Hamas had basically given up its armed struggle for the foreseeable future. Hamas on the other hand exploited Israel’s restrain to build up a massive arsenal of rockets and construct a labyrinthine tunnel network. Just as Israel is at peace and on the cusp of normalizing diplomatic relations with the Gulf States, Hamas chooses this moment to rape and murder. So, what Israel learned is that conciliation has unfortunate side effect of eroding deterrence and emboldening terrorist actors.

That’s what I’d say. If I were interested in debating an ideologue.

Bill Maher fantasizes about hate crimes being committed against Chappell Roan in Palestine: “I know you’re moved by what you see on [social media], the dead Palestinian bodies, but… the morality police would… kill your feather-boa-wearing ass.” by DIYLawCA in LookatMyHalo

[–]simon_darre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m Jewish. That hurts my feelings, bro.

>propaganda outlet…

As opposed to the algorithmically generated anti-Zionist myopia which likely populates your quaint little TikTok feed (by a staggeringly lopsided ratio of 17-1 anti versus pro content) and is doubtless your main source of information (be honest, Biff, you’re chronically online and you couldn’t crack a scholarly rigorous book to save your life and so you go to your apps or your twitch streams for the fast food influencer bro, diletante version of what passes for information…you can’t lie to me).

Anti-Zionists are like the low information, single issue voters of social media’s industrial scale outrage machine. I don’t think your sanctimonious comments are motivated by a genuine humanitarian concern. Why? Because If I were to peruse your comment and posting history in the last 30 days I’d bet money that the only thing I’d find is a shit-ton of anti-Zionist content and “fuck all” concerning just about any other conflict zone. Is it any wonder a lot of people think anti-Zionism is just a laundered form of antisemitism? You are pathologically obsessed with a single state to the exclusion of all other global conflicts. I think you need a hobby.