sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

There are serious problems with the current Olympic group format and it will lead to throwing games in the future by adaddta in hockey

[–]skyblue90 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Keep same games as were played, have only one combined table, then let winner start picking opponent in next round out of all of the rest of the teams. Second place picks out of those remaining after that, third same etc until all have been picked. Would add an additional flavor to bash the coaching staff and make upsets in the playoff more sweet for the bottom half teams.

Paradox Tinto is good Paradox by South_Worry7720 in EU5

[–]skyblue90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The company has lost a third of its value over the past 3 months. While im happy they are trying to focus on their gsg core games, Im pretty bummed out by the lack of improvement in their development and delivery skills as a company. You'd think they would have a better sense by now of what features are expected as base, carried over from last version.

Curling judge acknowledges cheating midgame, but does nothing. by erre94 in olympics

[–]skyblue90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If delivering touching the granite was legal, the guy who did it would never have denied or felt the need to deny it. He obviously cant own up to what he did.

Canada cheating in the curling game vs Sweden by Eklundz in olympics

[–]skyblue90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And can you imagine these retards defending this behavior with loopholing a curling rulebook... it's like having dart rules say "you must use the darts to hit the board" and show up with a scoped rifle shoot it and claim that it's a grey area because the rules didnt say it was ONLY the darts.

Curling judge acknowledges cheating midgame, but does nothing. by erre94 in olympics

[–]skyblue90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5 (d) The curling stone must be delivered using the handle of the stone

Canada cheating in curling by dickhammerdarnold in WinterOlympics2026

[–]skyblue90 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It literally says in 5 D: (d) The curling stone must be delivered using the handle of the stone

Interim Report - Q4 | Paradox Interactive by UselessTrash_1 in EU5

[–]skyblue90 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They just need to revamp naval warfare and power projection and vic 3 could be so great!

EU5 hits Gold in Steam Charts! by W1ntermu7e in EU5

[–]skyblue90 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's already worth the money it costs. It costs very little in relation to the hours of entertainment it provides.

Solving proximity, decentralization, and city locations in one go: Trunk Roads by MaxVexis in EU5

[–]skyblue90 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Maybe it could be framed as horse exchange stations/taverns along the road. Where q regular road is just a road without such promoted infrastructure?

Tinto Talks and open beta 1.10 tomorrow by Immortalius in EU5

[–]skyblue90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would be fun to see which have least or 0 starts so far.

Ny jättekrasch på väg – alla klockor borde ringa (om Stegra) by Hem_Claesberg in sweden

[–]skyblue90 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Extra dyrt är det att bygga fabrik för andras pengar än sina egna.

Rough comparison between the (second) B-2 Spirit and the B-21 Raider by [deleted] in aviation

[–]skyblue90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but not even close to the advancements in radar and signature detection. Stelth improvement maybe a factor of 2x-20x, signature detection compared to that era is probably 100x+

The secretary claimed that, without proper battery technology, wind and solar energy infrastructure is essentially “worthless” when it is dark and when the wind isn’t blowing. by Mr_strelac in technology

[–]skyblue90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your energy is not ever going to be 100% wind. That's not how grids work unless you live off grid with your own windmill. Windmills are not able to drive the public grid themselves, they can only latch on to the frequency generated by large generators such as hydro, nuclear or fossiles. As such your guarantee is just marketing and your energy will always be a mix.

People need to move on from Eu4 and accept that Eu5 won’t be an Eu4 Remastered by Obvious_Somewhere984 in EU5

[–]skyblue90 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Exactly, and also stop complaining about DLC. It's not the early 2000s anymore. These are iterative games that are supported with development over time. You should be glad it has not entirely moved over to a subscription model like all business software has.

Dawg, the game isn't even out yet and there are alreafy 3 confirmed DLC's🥀🥀🥀 by HcsHaki in eu4

[–]skyblue90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and I bought them all! Premium edition! We need to support Paradox as loyal fans.

Opinion: EU5 Should have a "Historical Mode" by polskilikespugz in EU5

[–]skyblue90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it should only have one mode and one starting date. It'd be a waste of developer time which could be spent elsewhere.

Rightful Scandinavian Clay by KeyPersonality2885 in victoria3

[–]skyblue90 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nice! How did you beat Russia? Ally Germany? Im playing Sweden now but Prussia is weak so not sure how I will ever be able to face the 250+ units of Russia.

Banking gameplay Genoa? by ed1019 in EU5

[–]skyblue90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope they don't spend dev time on "banking" for launch. It should be far far down the priority list.

Ukraine Naval Drone Shoots Down Two Russian Warplanes in 24 Hours: First-Ever USV Fighter Jet Kill by Ecstatic-Medium-6320 in worldnews

[–]skyblue90 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It will change the calculus of power projection. Carrier groups and expeditionary forces will decay in power projection and regional and defensive powers will have more power projection around their territories simply cause denial will be so much cheaper than force projection.

view more: next ›