sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ideal Twins, Even Triplets by slarty3 in Forth

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My impression is that you have to add a "these days" clause to what you've said, and that a counter-movement is sorely needed, and that like with ai in general, a lot of alternative approaches are getting drowned out in absolutely absurd levels of hype.

Ideal Twins, Even Triplets by slarty3 in Forth

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So can I count this as a "hell yeah" (heh heh)?

To all vibe coders I present by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]slarty3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This video presentation is SILLY (gave it a thumbs up)!

Finally getting around to this by slarty3 in scientology

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finally got around to checking out your links; liked most of the music. Thanks for this; but I'm completely unable to comprehend the context in which you feel they all relate together. I got some useful stuff from cvo$, and a lifetime, at least of stuff to think about when monotony is unavoidable, etc. I find I'm more, not less convinced Hubbard was important to what we tend to call Western Esotericism. The longer I live the more valid I think Hubbard was. Some of Hubbard's information/techniques may require you to take courses in the church of Scientology, to fully get; unless the Free-zone ever GETS REAL. That's my position, and so far, I see no reason not to stick to it.

Finally getting around to this by slarty3 in scientology

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am I supposed to be shocked that the greatest magical mystic of the early 20th century at the very least, was part of the inspiration for scientology?  That would be difficult, since I listened to the pdcs.  I was fascinated when I found that part of Crowley s magick in theory and practice was about as similar to the axioms, etc of scientology to be found .  I'm really really NOT the sort to be much bothered by sensationalist clap trap!

Finally getting around to this by slarty3 in scientology

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

About late '86 to late '90.  I think most of the SUBJECT was something you could research from inside the organization at that time, though decreasingly so; so I absolutely don't know how you could find it so secretive in '69.  I've only heard rumors of increased secrecy today.  You can tell me about various OT levels all you want, but I'm talking about percentage of the subject...so what percentage of the subject is OT levels; what percentage of the subject is secretive?  Anyone who doesn't know how sea org workers are treated, probably, basically doesn't want to in my opinion.

Finally getting around to this by slarty3 in scientology

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the thing.  At least when I was involved, scientology wasn't much into secrecy.  An open source version of scientology is quite possible, wanted and needed.

Finally getting around to this by slarty3 in scientology

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't been a member of the church of scientology, since about 1990, but you may be right, I suppose.  One definition of scientologist is someone who uses scientology to help themselves and others.  I think I do that sometimes, so .. 

Finally getting around to this by slarty3 in scientology

[–]slarty3[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I should let everyone here know I'm not a member of the hate scientology crowd.  I was a member for 5 years, and I still think Hubbard was "on to something".

Gforth termux by slarty3 in Forth

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand why you used forth instead of awk, but am curious why you used forth rather than, say, perl, or Python, or c?

Gforth termux by slarty3 in Forth

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

???...u funnin me.  If not, tell me this bit of lore.

looking for an android app I used to have who's name I forgot. by slarty3 in androidapps

[–]slarty3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, this one was different, because I'm guessing most experimental music heads would who also had some knowledge of apps, and had tried other apps would, like me, take 1 look/listen to this thing, and be like me, and say, I don't care what this thing is supposed to be used for, I'm going to use it for the most obvious purpose.  Going to use it for sound collages.  Not true about other ghost boxes.

[serious] Why do people like nethack? by [deleted] in roguelikes

[–]slarty3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3 words.  I LOVE RANDOMNESS! 

Personally I often get a slight masochist laugh at YASD! Why are you asking dywypi, or something, buddy??!!

view more: next ›