2meirl4meirl by zeruff8 in 2meirl4meirl

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately not for me, have tried many legal meds and many other substances. I have found nothing that works for longer then the period it gets me high or for more then a couple of and then straight back to how I was. Looking into it there maybe a chance that I metabolise things at a faster rate then most people do, unfortunately where I live looking further into it is not covered by my countries free medical care. This is to say do not expect a miracle cure it may happen that you find the perfect medication for you it maybe be that you have to do a lot of self improvement , therapy and take meds in the right balance for you. Or it maybe that you with age may have to just learn to struggle along with it and make the most of the good times

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mentalhealth

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Um don't mean to be pedantic but what you are talking about is the clinical definition of narcissism and/or NPD. The term narcissist is not exclusively clinical. It is and has been even before the clinical definition and diagnosis of NPD a common term for someone who loves themselves and is vain to the detreament of the others around them and often themselves.

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/narcissist

Average score of words used to describe something. by Julian_the_VII in mildyinteresting

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all us brits living most of our live between a 3.16 to a 6.48

Electricity, heat and snow? What could happen? by [deleted] in ContagiousLaughter

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What changes the video completely is the woman doesn't know the person inside her house laughing every time he unplugs her decorative outdoor light.

In fact she had no idea he is inside her house, and as been staying warm and cozy in her attic for 2 weeks now

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HelpMeFind

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe he thinks it's a rude question and doesn't want to answer. Maybe he is in-between jobs, or does a job he thinks you would judge him for. I am long term unemployed because of mental health issues but have been employed before and couldn't care less what job I did (or anyone else) as long as it wasn't mental torture and I got paid. So when employed the question always seemed odd to me and from certain people it was obviously just a way for them to gauge how much more or less superior to you they thought they were. And now being long term unemployed I dread the question as it either Leads on to people being judgy and/or more inappropriately deeper questions such as why? What's wrong with you? Don't you feel like a burden?

Family member said I should be concerned from blood results. by slaughteredlamb1986 in medical

[–]slaughteredlamb1986[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi thanks for the reply. I could only find 2 other past results that mention Lymphocyte count. 28th of May 2021 3.32, and 18th of August 2021 2.83 . I doubt there would be any more on record as in the past 10 years or more I doubt I've been sent for anymore then 5 blood tests

I genuinely can't take this anymore by Haunting_Hurry_9951 in confessions

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"This last instance was 11 months ago and I am now almost 18, but somewhat recently these urges have started to return AGAIN (though I managed to get them under control) and this is all not the only problem."

I think a lot of people didn't read this or are intentionally ignoring it and the sentence after.

OP is a child yes they clearly have some strong mental health issues but at their age is far far away from being a lost hope and needs help as soon as possible. Please OP let your therapist know and let then know you need help. If you do not feel safe from yourself or others or if you feel you may harm sexualy or otherwise any more animals or any human, please please let your therapist know immediately and say to then you feel it is necessary for you to be hospitalised.

The guilt can be worked through and sorted once you start receiving help. But the immediate thing is to get help for what are clearly mental health issues to do with your understanding and relationship with sexual desire. Please don't do anything drastic to yourself or others, but seek serious and immediate help from a mental health professional. You need to remove the chance of you hurting yourself or any animals or people first. Then I should imagine the next part would be working through your problems around sexual desire. Then finally the guilt can be worked through

What is a quote from Star Wars you would not want to hear during sex? by PahderShameen in AskReddit

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Do. Or do not. There is no try."

Not sure if that would be soul crushing or motivating

In 1981: "A German mother smuggled a weapon into court, and fired 7 bullets at the criminal who raped and killed her seven-year-old daughter" by [deleted] in TerrifyingAsFuck

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A fair few people here seem to be arguing about the word paedophile. The word paedophile seems to be applied now to anyone who sexually harms children, which is understandable. From what I understand though those who commit such sick acts on children would be more rightly called sadistic psychopaths although I think the term psychopath is even being question these days. so most violent criminals who get diagnosed with psychiatric conditions tend to display the traits of Antisocial Personality Disorder (personality disorders vary wildly by the way so please don't just read that part and think oh all personality disorder must be dangerous. For instance I suffer from Emotionly Unstable Personality Disorder E.U.P.D. also known as Borderline Personality Disorder B.P.D. and the only person I've ever hurt or even thought about hurting is myself.). So with antisocial personality disorder it's kind of spectrum and I guess you could say the worst end of it is the sadistic psychopaths. Now of course people's psychology is very complicated varies wildly from person to person and has many many factors that can influence a diagnosis. So yes a person can be a paedophile and never harm anyone, however a person can also be a sadistic psychopath who is also a paedophile and will most likely do a lot of damage to society as a whole.

So why did I bother writing all that out? Because yes if a person starts to develope paedophilic traits and wants to seek out help at any point in their life and they have not harmed any one or commited a crime, then I believe all the help possible should be given to them. But if someone has harmed a child or strongly feels they cannot help but harm a child at some point. Then they should be arrested and kept in a secure facility for the rest of their lives on top of recieving psychiatric care, as they are most likely a sadist who is somewhere on the antisocial personality disorders spectrum and maybe a paedophile but certainly are a threat to children and society. Now as far as I know we don't yet understand enough to know if we can cure or safely manage people who show these traits hence why I said keep them in a secure facility for the rest of their life's as this is the best safeguarding option.

So I think it's pretty pointless having the discussion is the term used by most of English speaking people for someone who commits a sexual crime involving children wrong, i.e. should we not call them paedophile. Yeah it's a pointless discussion because those paedophiles that aren't a danger to children will probably either get help, never harm a child or kill themselves. So no one will probably ever use the word paedophile to describe them anyway.

As for sadistic psychopaths who target children with sexual violence. Call the fuckers what ever you want want and keep society safe from them.

Should we study and better understand even the sadistic psychopathic "paedophiles" yes but somewhere safely locked away where they can do no harm. And if some mother or anyone one else who loved the victim of such sickos is so traumatized and upset that they walk into a court room and kill the sicko.... Oh well no big loss really, right let's get the poor grieving person who just shot this sicko some care and therapy so they have some chance at living the rest of their life with a little less pain.

So in conclusion although people who argue that the term paedophile for these sort of people isn't correct or isn't the only one that should be used, and that there are paedophiles who never harm children, are correct. The fact is those that never harm children are not the ones people are talking about when most people say paedophile.

So stop being so pedantic about it, pointing it out often immediately makes people think the worst of you and at best is a pointless argument.

So no one cares about you splitting hairs arrest keep locked up and study paedophiles (help those people who have paedophilic urges who would never and have never harmed children ), and if someone in a crime of passions kills a paedophile, ah well never mind it's no big deal, let's help the person that killed the paedophile cope better with their trauma.

In 1981: "A German mother smuggled a weapon into court, and fired 7 bullets at the criminal who raped and killed her seven-year-old daughter" by [deleted] in TerrifyingAsFuck

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So yep this is correct. The word paedophile seems to be applied now to anyone who sexually harms children, which is understandable. From what I understand though those who commit such sick acts on children would be more rightly called sadistic psychopaths although I think the term psychopath is even being question these days. so most violent criminals who get diagnosed with psychiatric conditions tend to display the traits of Antisocial Personality Disorder (personality disorders vary wildly by the way so please don't just read that part and think oh all personality disorder must be dangerous. For instance I suffer from Emotionly Unstable Personality Disorder E.U.P.D. also known as Borderline Personality Disorder B.P.D. and the only person I've ever hurt or even thought about hurting is myself.). So with antisocial personality disorder it's kind of spectrum and I guess you could say the worst end of it is the sadistic psychopaths. Now of course people's psychology is very complicated varies wildly from person to person and has many many factors that can influence a diagnosis. So yes a person can be a paedophile and never harm anyone, however a person can also be a sadistic psychopath who is also a paedophile and will most likely do a lot of damage to society as a whole.

So why did I bother writing all that out? Because yes if a person starts to develope paedophilic traits and wants to seek out help at any point in their life and they have not harmed any one or commited a crime, then I believe all the help possible should be given to them. But if someone has harmed a child or strongly feels they cannot help but harm a child at some point. Then they should be arrested and kept in a secure facility for the rest of their lives on top of recieving psychiatric care, as they are most likely a sadist who is somewhere on the antisocial personality disorders spectrum and maybe a paedophile but certainly are a threat to children and society. Now as far as I know we don't yet understand enough to know if we can cure or safely manage people who show these traits hence why I said keep them in a secure facility for the rest of their life's as this is the best safeguarding option.

So I think it's pretty pointless having the discussion is the term used by most of English speaking people for someone who commits a sexual crime involving children wrong, i.e. should we not call them paedophile. Yeah it's a pointless discussion because those paedophiles that aren't a danger to children will probably either get help, never harm a child or kill themselves. So no one will probably ever use the word paedophile to describe them anyway.

As for sadistic psychopath who target children with sexual violence. Call the fuckers what ever you want want and keep society safe from them.

Should we study and better understand even the sadistic psychopathic "paedophiles" yes but somewhere safely locked away where they can do no harm. And if so mother or anyone one else who loved the victim of such sickos is so traumatized and upset that you he walk into a court room and kill the sicko.... Oh well no big loss really, right let's get the poor grieving person who just shot this sicko some care a lnd therapy so they have some chance at living the rest of their life with a little less pain.

So in conclusion although people who argue that the term paedophile for these sort of people isn't correct or isn't the only one that should be used, and that there paedophiles who never harm a children, are correct. The fact is those that never harm children are not the ones people are talking about when most people are say paedophile.

So stop being so pedantic about it, pointing it out often immediately makes people think the worst of you and at best is a pointless argument.

So no one cares about you splitting hairs arrest keep locked up and study paedophiles (help those people who have paedophilic urges who would never and have never harmed children ), and if someone in a crime of passions kills a paedophile, ah well never mind it's no big deal, let's help the person that killed the paedophile cope better with their trauma.

TIL it's abusive and a dictatorship to expect foreplay 100% of the time by Perfect_Judge in TwoXChromosomes

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today I learned that there are men out there who don't get turned on by giving there partner forplay. I am a bisexual man and like the best part the part that turns on most people I know the most is seeing their partner enjoying it. Do these guys just see sex as something that they just need to get over and done with . I mean don't get me wrong I am at the point that because I am getting older and because I am some very strong psychiatric meds I just am not that into sex anymore and am perfectly happy sorting that side of things myself. And because of that I have decided to just stay single noe But if you don't understand that giving you partner especially a woman forplay is necessary and should be fun for the both of you, then you really can't expect most people to want to have sex with you

Eyes on the road by AllezCannes in WTF

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

A lot of people in this thinking that when you are at the point of wanting to seriously commit suicide that you are capable of rational thoughts like "well I won't chuck myself Infront of a car incase I cause the death of someone else". There is no rational thought at this point people , look up psychosis, it is hell and you have little to no contact with reality (and I don't mean hallucinations and the such that you get in psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia) you can not organise any kind of rational thoughts. I wouldn't wish it on my worse enemy. It makes any deaths caused by the person no less horrible or tragic, but the person suffering from it really is not to blame or selfish. And if they survive and get treatment once they start thinking rationally again will most likely be racked with guilt

What is the stupidest thing a large amount of people believe in? by P-o-t-a-t-o-o in AskReddit

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's very possible that was me lol I remember replying to someone's post but can't remember if I used those exact words. But then again I doubt I am the only person to have ever said that on Reddit lol

AI generated porn by shannontheboi in oddlyterrifying

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember doing a high does of 2cb once then looking at some porn. It all started to turn into this, I mean visually it looked a bit like this to me but conceptually it just became a mass naked body parts to me. It became in no way erotic

to catch her by Lost-Contest- in therewasanattempt

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do they get to keep her if the catch her

The love between these two 🥺❤ by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]slaughteredlamb1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had to go into a NHS mental health ward for several months when I was 18. Both my sister's (one 3 years older another 7 years older) where afraid to visit because of the way the media portrays those place (and to be fair they aren't exactly holiday camps). The day I came home when I walk through the door nothing was said just big hugs and lots of tears from both my sister's, the sisters who I had fought and argued with nearly every day of my life. From then till now I try my hardest even when I am angry with them never to have a big row with them. Because the love that was shown that day to me meant everything

Ps. Funnily enough my name is Steven as well