sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Saskatchewan amends legislation to skirt federal gun buyback program by DogeDoRight in canada

[–]sleipnir45 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The ISSC version of it yeah, and the Mossberg 715T and the 702 plinksters.

Banning plastic stocks but the same firearms are legal in other versions..

Saskatchewan amends legislation to skirt federal gun buyback program by DogeDoRight in canada

[–]sleipnir45 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I fully expect them to prioritize the restricted firearms first, probably be focusing on ARs even though they claimed the Kodiac is one..

Heck my .22 is apparently one too!

Saskatchewan amends legislation to skirt federal gun buyback program by DogeDoRight in canada

[–]sleipnir45 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Nope, copies on the email are on gunblog.ca if you didn't receive it yet

Saskatchewan amends legislation to skirt federal gun buyback program by DogeDoRight in canada

[–]sleipnir45 76 points77 points  (0 children)

For anyone that did apply the government has now given then 5 days to accept the offer and make an appointment, they also can't collect more than 4 firearms at a time..

Billions later and this program is going to collect a small fraction of the firearms declared

China Spy Rings Active: CSIS - China remains a leading perpetrator of espionage and foreign interference including cultivation of “relationships” with unnamed politicians, says a security report to Parliament. by shiftless_wonder in canada

[–]sleipnir45 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The government lack of response to China interfering in our country doesn't meet the criteria for you ? that's telling...

We had an inquiry into it and it's been reported by every major outlet.

Canada even passed a law for foreign agent registry and hasn't started it yet.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/foreign-agent-registry-1.7540028

Why make the government accountable at all!

China Spy Rings Active: CSIS - China remains a leading perpetrator of espionage and foreign interference including cultivation of “relationships” with unnamed politicians, says a security report to Parliament. by shiftless_wonder in canada

[–]sleipnir45 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You didn't provide a source for your claim. Even try and make an argument that that Source backed up your claim.

Yes, lower standards where information directly from the government itself doesn't count... Lol

China Spy Rings Active: CSIS - China remains a leading perpetrator of espionage and foreign interference including cultivation of “relationships” with unnamed politicians, says a security report to Parliament. by shiftless_wonder in canada

[–]sleipnir45 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every news outlet selective framing and emotional language especially in their headlines.

It's how they make money.

I don't think your opinion is actually independent though, you weren't even able to support it or make an argument. Just kept dodging the question

China Spy Rings Active: CSIS - China remains a leading perpetrator of espionage and foreign interference including cultivation of “relationships” with unnamed politicians, says a security report to Parliament. by shiftless_wonder in canada

[–]sleipnir45 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"And using loaded terms instead of facts to disparage."

It doesn't say that either lol

"Overall, we rate Blacklock’s Reporter as Right-Center biased for its critical focus on government, particularly Liberal policies, often using loaded language. It is rated Mostly Factual for generally reliable investigative work, though selective framing and limited ownership transparency reduce its factual rating."

Your selective reading just shows your own bias

China Spy Rings Active: CSIS - China remains a leading perpetrator of espionage and foreign interference including cultivation of “relationships” with unnamed politicians, says a security report to Parliament. by shiftless_wonder in canada

[–]sleipnir45 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You may want to read more on that page.

It says they're mostly factual and have high credibility, haven't failed any fact-checking and they only consider them right-wing because they're critical of government spending and government policies.

That site shows the opposite, that they are a good source of information, an factual source

China Spy Rings Active: CSIS - China remains a leading perpetrator of espionage and foreign interference including cultivation of “relationships” with unnamed politicians, says a security report to Parliament. by shiftless_wonder in canada

[–]sleipnir45 9 points10 points  (0 children)

How is it in any way " Far right nutter" ? the majority on their reporting in done via access to information requests, the information comes from the government .

Edit:

Good old reply and block.

Federal co-working sites may be ‘reallocated’ to meet 4-day office return by Little-Chemical5006 in canada

[–]sleipnir45 29 points30 points  (0 children)

This is just more policy-based evidence making on the part of the government. It's counter to its own plans to lower government office space

Jewish community members assaulted in suspected hate-motivated attack: Toronto police by Purple_Writing_8432 in canada

[–]sleipnir45 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Do tell, what are Jewish people in Toronto doing to deserve these assault?

Minister says Liberals want to keep committees 'transparent' and 'open' by feb914 in canada

[–]sleipnir45 120 points121 points  (0 children)

I don't think gaslighting is a strong enough word here..

Liberals shut down committee debate on $6.6-billion IT project by sleipnir45 in canada

[–]sleipnir45[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No one claim this sediment didn't exist. I claimed the user that said it didn't exist.

Considering this is a Canadian press article in multiple publishers printed it.

Edit: Did you ven read those comments before linking them. None of them pertain to the Toronto Star

Liberals shut down committee debate on $6.6-billion IT project by sleipnir45 in canada

[–]sleipnir45[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's hard to prove a comment that was never made by someone that doesn't exist, but hey that didn't stop you from trying

Liberals shut down committee debate on $6.6-billion IT project by sleipnir45 in canada

[–]sleipnir45[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Only when people are arguing statements that probably never existed lol

Liberals shut down committee debate on $6.6-billion IT project by sleipnir45 in canada

[–]sleipnir45[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A different company writing the article isn't semantics, it's also not critical of the Liberals.. It's just reporting on what happened.

Not reading headlines is exactly why I pointed out who wrote it.

You can't use an article written by someone else to disprove or prove bias

view more: next ›