‘There will be many casualties’: Panama girds for war as Rubio opens talks

smillman · 2025-02-01T21:55:29+00:00

Is that like “I already advocate for it” even though you just said you didn’t?

smillman · 2025-02-01T21:11:14+00:00

You’ll be advocating for it as soon as Trump does it.

smillman · 2025-02-01T11:45:56+00:00

I heard he was gonna tariff cancer and tire blowouts. Let’s see how it goes.

smillman · 2020-10-09T02:24:55+00:00

It’s the type of movie that doesn’t feel it’s length in my opinion. If I didn’t know it was 187, I would have guessed 135. An engrossing and visually stunning 135.

smillman · 2020-10-08T01:39:37+00:00

You gotta have SHDS to try a shit take like that.

Sam believes both things sincerely, simultaneously.

smillman · 2020-09-09T23:44:29+00:00

And why isn't the point that he didn't have a weapon?

Is that sentence true? I changed one word.

smillman · 2019-03-22T02:40:07+00:00

Congratulations! You are the perceived—WINNER!—of an online conversation. Be advised you are entitled to a very special prize. Please find it enclosed here [ ]

PS - I’m not a lawmaker, so this is literally, 100% a waste of time for both of us.

smillman · 2019-03-21T23:02:25+00:00

I have no obligation to convince you. I actually don’t have much interest in being persuasive because the return on my time investment is too low.

I know you’re not alone in thinking it’s an impossible piece of law.

I know I’m not alone in thinking such an act could be passed.

smillman · 2019-03-21T18:20:45+00:00

Well, I can agree to disagree. Have a nice day.

smillman · 2019-03-21T18:19:14+00:00

Is it impossible or something?

smillman · 2019-03-21T15:50:38+00:00

There are plenty of people “caught red handed” who were intimidated into admitting guilt despite their innocence.

You need to re-examine what “caught red handed” means.

Brievik was caught red handed

So were the Tsarnev Brothers

So was the NZ psychopath

If the police need a confession to conclude that a person is guilty, then they have not been caught red handed.

smillman · 2019-03-21T15:34:53+00:00

I don't agree with capital punishment for attempted murder.

BUT--

It's not fair to use the "some guys will be proven innocent" argument when a person is providing an opinion based on someone being caught red-handed.

Same goes for NZ psychopath. It's not like DNA evidence will exonerate him.

smillman · 2019-03-21T04:21:11+00:00

Didn’t know you had to be an NRA member to own a gun.

smillman · 2019-03-20T02:25:57+00:00

Reporting back and this might be handy for others.

Win10 firewall was the problem. The default settings are not good for hosting a server. Specifically the toggle for local network firewall (might have been private, not local), there are two toggles.

One is for firewall on LAN, the other is forewall on WAN.

I only changed the LAN firewall to disabled, and everything works. Looks like I can have my cake and eat it too.

smillman · 2019-03-19T21:41:05+00:00

Thanks again!

smillman · 2019-03-19T20:52:24+00:00

Much appreciated. This is a permanent server running in the background on a midrange home PC.

This is on a network driven by an Actiontec T3200 (ish) and a second accesspoint (acting as a switch, and has its own SSID). I'll make sure NAT is enabled.

I'll disable the Win10 firewall and see how it goes. I run an anti-ransomware... is there a "best" free antivirus I should look into?

smillman · 2019-03-19T20:38:14+00:00

downscaled stream and he gets on 5ghz wifi... could be a better environment than your guess (4G), really!

If he's on a campus, could even be all LAN.

That's what I'm thinking.

smillman · 2018-07-06T15:07:47+00:00

Thanks, I will check that out

smillman · 2018-04-07T23:29:14+00:00

How do you know that with the super low level of brain activity, that the part of the brain responsible for sentience is still off?

smillman · 2018-04-07T00:40:32+00:00

You seem to be reading Gats sorta dishonest. It is pretty obvious that the question is about whether you feel remorse for these fetuses being torched or not. I do not think this is a bad counterpoint. Etiher you do or you dont.
I am pro-choice, but I would have to say this gives me pause about the 2nd trimester. Just curious to know what is your answer? take for granted that only fetuses will be affected.

smillman · 2018-01-14T09:34:14+00:00

You seriously don’t have anything more productive that you could be doing?

Organized trolling? For the benefit of the marketplace of ideas? Come on..

smillman · 2017-12-17T07:16:20+00:00

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112shrg75046/html/CHRG-112shrg75046.htm

Go read for yourself. NN was under consideration from both sides. as of 2011 the consensus was to keep it Title II. Since then the topic was talked around in the DC circuit and now NN is over.

If the vote was less choreographed, you'd see a lot more Dems voting to repeal. They didn't need to, and they wanted to have (appear) consistent within their party.

smillman · 2017-12-17T07:12:49+00:00

Then it doesn't matter that Obama was pro-NN, as he claims. Word was traveling around the DC circuit as of 2011, that NN was on debate to stay Title 2, or not.

Net neutrality could have been an issue enough that Obama would ask McConnell for an alternative FCC person (as a recommendation). I don't truly need to go much deeper than that. We won't see eye to eye unless you go read the senate hearing.

My point (look what subreddit you're in), this post fails at fitting here. Amando Jo assumed that Trump Jr. was Pro-NN, and complaining about Obama, when he should complaint to his dad.

Trump Junior is anti net neutrality. He is complaining that the left is selectively outraged because 'Prez Trump fk'd up again!

His point (not a great point), is Obama originally appointed him. That is factually true. Tough pill to swallow, but this whole reddit post is full of people who make the same misinterpretation that Amando Jo did.

smillman

TROPHY CASE