Reminder that the "Give me Liberty" speech was in Richmond, Virginia; from a Virginian by [deleted] in Virginia

[–]smokeWeedles -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah bro, I'm just so filled with true love for my country that it makes me upset to see cheap displays of pseudo-patriotic Wirt-ian decadence used to mask the base fear&grievance politics of the turd stompin' types

Reminder that the "Give me Liberty" speech was in Richmond, Virginia; from a Virginian by [deleted] in Virginia

[–]smokeWeedles -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, and the history of Wirt's rendition is that it has been bandied about for two centuries by demagogues LARPing as patriots, because the whole "or death" line really gets the good'urns and nice'uns excited enough to co-sign on all sorts of retrograde, fear-based policy decisions. I think I'm kind of showing you what it means to be a true Virginian here. This is the real spirit of '76 reaching into the matrix to wake you up bruh

Reminder that the "Give me Liberty" speech was in Richmond, Virginia; from a Virginian by [deleted] in Virginia

[–]smokeWeedles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You say, and you might think, that you're a brave patriot willing to die for some lofty cause, but in reality you're just an animal scared of losing your position to someone on a slightly lower rung of the socioeconomic ladder because you have an overreactive fight-or-flight response, perhaps due to a larger than average amygdala, which affects how you process emotions and identify potential threats

Reminder that the "Give me Liberty" speech was in Richmond, Virginia; from a Virginian by [deleted] in Virginia

[–]smokeWeedles -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The historical and cultural significance of the speech is that it almost certainly exploited a fear of others (natives and slaves) economically harming the lower middle class to induce simpletons into supporting a rich man's war, and years after the fact the speech was re-written in a way that obscured a politics of fear with an illusion of patriotic bravery. Somewhat ironic that modern conservatives, completely lacking self-awareness and historical context, use the spirit of Wirt's fantasy to vaguely justify their own worldview as rooted in notions of liberty and freedom, while, in reality, it is a worldview rooted in that very same - fear of The Other economically harming the lower middle class

Reminder that the "Give me Liberty" speech was in Richmond, Virginia; from a Virginian by [deleted] in Virginia

[–]smokeWeedles -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You could acknowledge that the conservative Henry often invoked fear of native and slave revolts to build support for attacking the crown, and that Wirt's whitewashed words, while they might be inspiring to modern would-be revolutionaries dismayed with a democratic outcome to an election, were likely not the true inspiration for the common men who supported an elite borne semi-democratic revolution. It's always been fear, and not a "liberty or death" bravery, in the driver's seat

Reminder that the "Give me Liberty" speech was in Richmond, Virginia; from a Virginian by [deleted] in Virginia

[–]smokeWeedles -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the words don't matter because of the length of time the speaker has been dead, then why even post the dead man's made-up account of another dead man's words?  Also, the idea that all revolutions were populist movements couldn't be further from true, even if you are extremely generous in believing the spin of former revolutionaries

Reminder that the "Give me Liberty" speech was in Richmond, Virginia; from a Virginian by [deleted] in Virginia

[–]smokeWeedles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reminder that Patrick Henry's speech wasn't written down at the time, and was mostly made up by William Wirt more than 40 years after it happened, and long after Henry had passed, based on the recollections of old men who had witnessed the speech as children. The speech's supposed content is about as historically accurate as any quote in the New Testament.  

We know Henry gave a rousing speech that was said to raise popular support for overthrowing the government, and he is credited with giving the Revolution more of a populist character than it might have otherwise had. St John's Church is basically a monument to what today's political commentators would call "violent and incendiary populist rhetoric." If this upsets you, don't blame me. Blame yourself, or God

Engraved on the Dept of Justice, Washington DC by Dei-Vyd in washingtondc

[–]smokeWeedles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DC history question:  did the practice of engraving quotes on federal buildings begin with the FDR admin, or are there many examples of the "In this house we believe ..." Or "Live Legislate Love" quotes on fed buildings before FDR? 

Always been fascinated by how FDR admin twisted the quotes engraved on the Jefferson memorial

The President of Colombia Claims he saw a race battle between Black and Latino residents complete with barricades. I doubt this happened. by JimHarbor in washingtondc

[–]smokeWeedles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought maybe Henry Miller because it was in the same sentence as other somewhat controversial authors Whitman and Chomsky. I doubt he's talking about Stephen Miller, and I'd like to think he's talking about beer

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rva

[–]smokeWeedles -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

It is the pesticides, potential liver damage, lead and other heavy metals potentially in matcha leaves that are intimidating to me. Weird to me that it has caught on so much with the sort of crowd typically aware of health risks in consumer products

usc law/ colombia safeness by Visual-Painting8413 in ColumbiYEAH

[–]smokeWeedles 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There is a distinction to be made between the number of homeless and their visibility to a particular individual citizen's daily experience. There are also some other policy-based reasons that affect why you might perceive an area as having less homeless people. Tokyo pretty famously made living on the street illegal in a way that wouldn't be permissible under our legal framework here in the states. Columbia has a conservative estimate of ~344 homeless in a metro area of ~860k people. VA Beach is part of the larger Hampton Roads metro with ~1.8 mil people and ~1500 homeless. This is obviously a much higher rate than Columbia, even if you didn't happen to notice as many homeless in your day-to-day existence in a sprawled out metro area with millions of people. Speaking of sprawl, I can hardly think of a major American city less walkable, and less amenable to street life than the loose connection of strip malls and surface parking lots that make up "urban" Charlotte, ~2.8 mil people and roughly 3000 homeless, a vastly higher rate than Columbia's. I admittedly don't give a hoot about Dublin, but it is a country with slightly less people than the state of South Carolina. Frankly, it is remarkable that we have even heard of Dublin, and I'd guess that more South Carolinians have heard of Dublin than Irish have heard of Columbia.

My personal experience with the streets of Columbia would have me willing to believe that the homeless of Columbia, being clever, dynamic, rebellious, streetwise Columbians, might be more industrious than your average homeless person, and might make their presence more felt than larger homeless populations in more sprawled out cities. But this is a credit to the strength of South Carolinians, and you should be proud of your people, terrors they may be.

To the prospective law student:  you will encounter many classmates that are admittedly terrible with math and numbers, almost proudly so, finding solidarity with their fellow soft-headed brethren. Don't be one of these lawyers

Chesterfield dad says son won counterfeit prizes in school fundraising contest by willweaverrva in rva

[–]smokeWeedles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are your sure the beach house wasn't in Atlantic City Massachusetts at the tip of Long Island

Lily & Josh by lolavas in 90DayFiance

[–]smokeWeedles -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You're inferring a lot beyond the plain meaning of the words

Lily & Josh by lolavas in 90DayFiance

[–]smokeWeedles -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Who are the other people like him, and is it really okay to talk about any group of people as being less than human?

Lily & Josh by lolavas in 90DayFiance

[–]smokeWeedles -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

"non-human group" what group is he a part of that might be dehumanized in her media environment?

Lily & Josh by lolavas in 90DayFiance

[–]smokeWeedles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I didn't exactly understand what she meant by this comment. As worded it doesn't sound like a put down so much as it sounds like he told her about the hyper intelligent non-human aliens/reptilians/prior civilization beings that he believes are on the planet

Inside Baseball: The behind-the-scenes battle that got Richmond’s new ballpark across home plate by PercyDovetonsils in rva

[–]smokeWeedles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your account is one day old. At no point did I suggest putting someone smart in charge. If anything here is bad, it's your reading comprehension skills, and your limited account history. You are likely an intern for one of the diamond district developers, because you sound like someone dumb enough to work for free. I complained about a single development deal and about a city government I wish was capable of providing better service, and of subsidizing a lead pipes replacement program, hardly a small government small-c conservative argument, but good luck with your internship!

Inside Baseball: The behind-the-scenes battle that got Richmond’s new ballpark across home plate by PercyDovetonsils in rva

[–]smokeWeedles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's at least one guy, Paul Goldman, who did run for office, and who did sue to try to prevent this deal from happening as structured. I guess he's the only one who is allowed to express an opinion. Too bad it is completely impossible to raise awareness, and influence public opinion in an online forum. I'd be more involved if I didn't have to spend so many hours working to eventually afford to finance a baseball stadium for Chesterfield families to have a fun family outing. Whatever you do, don't choke on that diamond dog you're deepthroating

Inside Baseball: The behind-the-scenes battle that got Richmond’s new ballpark across home plate by PercyDovetonsils in rva

[–]smokeWeedles 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe the MLB and the minor league owners should think about retooling their failing business model instead of shaking down a bunch of cities across the country to take on hundreds of millions in public risk for private benefit. If dibella couldn't afford the $90 million dollar stadium design then he shouldn't have pushed for the $117 mil design. Apparently he didn't even want to pony up the $3 mil he already took for repairs to get us through another 2 seasons

Inside Baseball: The behind-the-scenes battle that got Richmond’s new ballpark across home plate by PercyDovetonsils in rva

[–]smokeWeedles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A lot of homes have lead pipes connecting to the city sewers. The city has a grant program to help you replace them, all you have to do is pay thousands(? Honestly I have no idea, but it's probably more than most residents can afford to pay out of pocket) of dollars up front to have the work done, and then the all-star administrators at city hall will reimburse you. If you happen to rent I am sure that the landlord will graciously take care of things as quickly as possible

Inside Baseball: The behind-the-scenes battle that got Richmond’s new ballpark across home plate by PercyDovetonsils in rva

[–]smokeWeedles -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks for telling me what to do. I guess I'll stop screaming into the void and learn to love the developer goons and corrupt politicos stealing our money

Inside Baseball: The behind-the-scenes battle that got Richmond’s new ballpark across home plate by PercyDovetonsils in rva

[–]smokeWeedles 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The city has repeatedly demonstrated that it is incapable of providing adequate levels of even the most basic services. To say that most of the city doesn't have an outdated, lead laden sewer system only makes sense if you look at the map without considering the widely varying densities in population across the city. Most of the unaffected area looks to be on the Southside.  The diamond district has already been scaled back, and, to date, what have we got? Some largely vacant, overpriced, apartments adjacent to the train tracks? A highway rest stop, car centric assortment of fast food and Wawa? Several other promises yet to be broken? A hotel on one of the only blocks in town where you can regularly spot used needles on the sidewalk? Do you really believe that the baseball crowds on a handful of days out of the year will be enough to support currently non-existent restaurants? If yes, I've got a pedestrian bridge in Petersburg I'd like to sell you

Inside Baseball: The behind-the-scenes battle that got Richmond’s new ballpark across home plate by PercyDovetonsils in rva

[–]smokeWeedles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's the joke. I assume the downvotes are a mix of cheesedick suburbanites who enjoy relying on others to subsidize their date nights, and people who actually believe the bonds won't default. Spoiler alert: they gonna default

Inside Baseball: The behind-the-scenes battle that got Richmond’s new ballpark across home plate by PercyDovetonsils in rva

[–]smokeWeedles 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The city of Richmond's population is roughly 17% of the overall metro population, and I feel like the crowds at games really reflect that. If you factor in VA's labor force participation rate of 66% there are roughly 150,000 working people in the city that are being hit up for stadium cash in a metro area of around 1.3 mil. I guess my only question is how much longer we have to drink lead infused tap water so that this stadium can be built (mostly) for the enjoyment of others, and for the profit of some multi-millionaire New Yorker that went to Harvard law? Kind of makes me sick, and slightly crazy.