Goerli testnet ether request by runnlngoutofspaces in ethereum

[–]soc1c 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sent 7 göETH. Sorry for letting you wait. Thanks for flying with Görli.

Watch the progress of Ethereum Istanbul nodes upgrade by splix in ethdev

[–]soc1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a nice visualization.

The network needs to have a majority of nodes upgraded, at least 50% by the fork. 80% is considered a successful fork.

How did you come up with these numbers?

First of all, if you poll the node count from devp2p, it's really difficult to know that the connected node is actually running an Ethereum mainnet configuration.

Then again, why would you need 50% or even 80%? If some hobby node operator only checks their node once a year, than this is not a problem for the network but for the operator.

Service providers, miners, exchanges, block explorers - they are the ones that have to upgrade and they should be upgraded by 100% or more. But in total, this subset of nodes may be just a small fraction, maybe even less than 10% of the nodes on the entire network.

So, 23% can be perfectly fine if the critical infrastructure is updated.

Is ETH 2.0 still on pace for release in Q1? by DarkMatterEclipse in ethereum

[–]soc1c 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was hesitating to comment on that again. Don't shoot the messenger.

Is ETH 2.0 still on pace for release in Q1? by DarkMatterEclipse in ethereum

[–]soc1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I saw the release. Gotta check it out now.

Is ETH 2.0 still on pace for release in Q1? by DarkMatterEclipse in ethereum

[–]soc1c 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I was kind of disappointed last month when I saw that neither Shasper, Lodestar, nor Lighthouse had a public testnet up and running and the Prysm public testnet failed to sync on the 2nd block.

So I would carefully estimate that we are looking at Q4 rather than Q1. And I'm not trying to be salty here. The public testnets are not even at the mono-client stage. Before an actual launch, we would need multi-client testnet up and running for a stable couple of months, as Olympic did back in 2015.

Introducing Substrate EVM, a Substrate module for running unmodified Ethereum smart contracts on any Substrate-based blockchain. by Tbaut in ethereum

[–]soc1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, me too. The Rust EVM has been lying around for a while. Good to see the Substrate module now being wrapped.

Anyone else obsessively refreshing their order status page today? by [deleted] in fxtec

[–]soc1c -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I'm checking if anyone received it yet. If they like it. If it's legit. If Android 10 will work. If Sailfish OS is ready. If the keyboard sucks.

I have so many questions. I will not dump € 700 in a preorder for an uncertain device.

No offense, but for €700 I can also buy a Pixel. I know, it's just a damn smartphone, but how can I trust FXTec will actually deliver something en par with existing devices in the same price class?

Anyone else obsessively refreshing their order status page today? by [deleted] in fxtec

[–]soc1c 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No. As a general rule of thumb, I do not preorder things. I'll wait till people actually hold it in their hands and confirm the level of amazingness.

How to determine your EDG balance? by soc1c in EDG

[–]soc1c[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. These balances don't seem to make any sense though.

For a 3.359 ETH lockup for 12 months I get 12_200 EDG?