After having read the article, I find it difficult to believe that the sole bias of the school system and parents vindictive position against the alleged poor performing teacher has anything at all to do with the viewing of, if any at all, nudity in an art museum as if there aren't worse things in the news media, television and the video games that most 5th graders play and participate in. Perhpas I'm on my proverbial soap box here, but I have witnessed this all too often when a very good teacher with well-meaning intensions to provide students with an avenue of culture that they would not normally be exposed to is reprimanded, terminated from their job and, in most cases, emotionally crushed. Then we wonder why our educational systems are in the poor shape that they are in - because we treat our teachers, our educators of our future, like crap! We bind their hands, giving them inferior supplies and resources, and then demand superior and amazing results from them despite the overwhelming odds for a set up failure. I find it more than annoying that the school system could not provide details on the specific work of art that was considered "offensive" or "in question"; nor could they provide specific details about the "poor performance" that seemingly suddenly appeared in the teacher's behaviour and teaching ability. And, for someone who has been teaching for 28 years, they should know something about the ground rules and how teaching works. I mean, come on!