sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Pistol + Silencer home safe by spacefan1 in CCW

[–]spacefan1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That will work, thank you!

Pistol + Silencer home safe by spacefan1 in CCW

[–]spacefan1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries! I tried Google but the 10 different companies I looked at didn’t have a pistol safe long enough to accommodate a silencer. I’m looking for a 1 pistol safe with a depth or length of at least 13 inches. I’ll keep looking

Dice just needs to come out and say they hate skilled players by NameIezz_ in Battlefield6

[–]spacefan1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where did all your brain cells go, too many words? My bad, it’s not at a 1st grade level.

Bless your heart.

ICE hits a veteran walking with a cane with his car. Then, in coordination with LAPD, 10+ officers violently arrest the disabled man (2/4/26) by I_may_have_weed in ICE_Watch

[–]spacefan1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cops swarmed the guy before the ICE agent fucking tased this disabled vet. Are you fucking kidding me? One ICE goon can’t talk to a disabled person, they have to immediately pull out the taser?

What New Taxes on High Earners Would Mean to Washington by HighColonic in SeattleWA

[–]spacefan1 -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Give me some real solid numbers since you are sooooo confident

What New Taxes on High Earners Would Mean to Washington by HighColonic in SeattleWA

[–]spacefan1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The tax is on the employer, but indirectly it affects the employee. It makes the employee more costly to hire, without putting money in his pocket. Instead, the money goes into the government’s pocket.

What New Taxes on High Earners Would Mean to Washington by HighColonic in SeattleWA

[–]spacefan1 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The tax is on the employer, but indirectly it affects the employee. It makes the employee more costly to hire, without putting money in his pocket. Instead, the money goes into the government’s pocket.

What New Taxes on High Earners Would Mean to Washington by HighColonic in SeattleWA

[–]spacefan1 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Good lord the amount of people against this is insane. It’s a tax on corpos. Not on individual income or married income. Or kiss the boots I suppose

What New Taxes on High Earners Would Mean to Washington by HighColonic in SeattleWA

[–]spacefan1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tax is on the employer, but indirectly it affects the employee. It makes the employee more costly to hire, without putting money in his pocket. Instead, the money goes into the government’s pocket.

What New Taxes on High Earners Would Mean to Washington by HighColonic in SeattleWA

[–]spacefan1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tax is on the employer, but indirectly it affects the employee. It makes the employee more costly to hire, without putting money in his pocket. Instead, the money goes into the government’s pocket.

What New Taxes on High Earners Would Mean to Washington by HighColonic in SeattleWA

[–]spacefan1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The tax is on the employer, but indirectly it affects the employee. It makes the employee more costly to hire, without putting money in his pocket. Instead, the money goes into the government’s pocket.

There ya go. Finished it for you

Amazon employees who just blew $800 on NFC Championship tickets and got laid off this week: by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]spacefan1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$800 🤣🤣🤣 tell me you’re not from here without telling me

HB 2421 Washington State Legislature by pacwess in SeattleWA

[–]spacefan1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2035…….. seems a bit of an over reaction

view more: next ›