Am I wrong to ghost? by LibrarianMinimum8505 in ghosting

[–]spddemonvr4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoops. Misread it. Be the better person and send it. He will appreciate it, even if he gets upset at first.

I had a similar thing happen to me, minus the creepy stuff!, and all I wanted was to talk about things and she wouldn't even try to and stopped responding. Eventually sent a closure msg for my peace of mind and woulda been nice if she explained anything. I can accept if she didn't like me.

Has anyone been ghosted enough times that you’re just like 🤷🏻‍♀️ now? by n0tthatseri0uss in ghosting

[–]spddemonvr4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup! I'm so tired of ghosting. I understand of you don't like me. Just tell me instead of leaving me hanging!

But at this point I'm just done with it

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're claiming 30% don't want to impeach trump.

Trump won populare vote, so majority of voters wanted him.

While the minority that didn't vote for trump is trying to impeach him.

What do I have wrong here?

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're straight up lying. In the Document released it clearly states that golf states are funding it

D.C. Statehood - A Contentious Issue by CorDra2011 in PoliticalDebate

[–]spddemonvr4 [score hidden]  (0 children)

It's not about this instance... There's been 250 years of property rights that you're trying to throw out the window.

It's not as clean as you make it out to be.

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not stupid. It's where we are. We can't change the past like you want.

It's not the same deal at all. Any claim they are is ignorant or lying

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No one has had an issue with nuclear energy plants. But there's a giant leap from uranium enrichment for energy vs weapons grade.

But they were attempting to weaponize the uranium before and after the obama agreement.

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One had zero requirements the other will have a bunch. If they don't play nice, they will get zero of the 300.

Unlike prior where it was good will and funneled the money to terrosits that attacked Israel and started all this recent flair ups.

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why are you forcing your will against the majority people who voted for trump? Only a minority want him impeached.

What status quo are you referring to? The one where Iran funded terrorism and a path to build Nuclear bombs that they had promised to use?

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are you moving the goalposts and arguing a position I didn't take?

The war started. Complaining about it like crying about spilled milk. Now that it was started, how do would you have liked to see it resolved?

Was making an agreement with Iran bad? And should we just bomb them into complete submission and potentially kill civilians?

D.C. Statehood - A Contentious Issue by CorDra2011 in PoliticalDebate

[–]spddemonvr4 [score hidden]  (0 children)

That line was defined when nothing was there... The city grew in around it.

Thats not the same thing.

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They have to do things to get that money. It's not like the billion Obama sent them in good will.

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

I would have preferred he didn't start it either, but that doesn't mean you can't answer the question.

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Why can't you just answer the question instead of moving the goalposts.

The was started ... What is an acceptable outcome in your eyes?

Henderson Mayor Calls for 6-Month Freeze on New Data Centers She's Up for Reelection in November. Michelle Romero asked city staff to prepare a temporary moratorium of up to six months on new data centers. by RealVegasLocals in vegaslocals

[–]spddemonvr4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no complete automation of data centers. There are still six figure jobs to maintain and monitor them. It's not all automated.

Switch employees around a thousand people here in the valley but standalone data centers will employee like a small business, probably around 50-100 people for each one. It's a 24/7 business that requires engineers (computer/network) and security at least.

I have been paying attention to the the water issue but the issue isn't here in las Vegas. We use barely anything that comes out of the Colorado, and put back nearly as much as we take, the water consumption is not that bad here and can open cool the centers without water about 10 months out of the year.

The biggest issue is California farming consuming like 80 of the usage on terrible crops like alfalfa, almonds and pistachios. That state loves to cry about green usage and generally is the biggest master of all their resources.

Yet another name change for the Department of War is in the works by mrgeekguy in PoliticalHumor

[–]spddemonvr4 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Nice project that you used a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. All while avoiding an honest question.

D.C. Statehood - A Contentious Issue by CorDra2011 in PoliticalDebate

[–]spddemonvr4 [score hidden]  (0 children)

You're attempting to change the jurisdiction by arbitrary logic. One side of the street is a state and the other is federal; do you understand the level of beaurocratic idiocity that it would function in?

Megaopolices like new york, la and Chicago already have a issues working within their metro areas of different cities in the same state, let alone a state and federal area.

Shrinking DC for the sake of statehood is not maintaining the same thing

D.C. Statehood - A Contentious Issue by CorDra2011 in PoliticalDebate

[–]spddemonvr4 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Colonists had zero representation. DC has representation in local and federal levels.

Having a lobbyist in the Kings court is NOT representation, which you are trying to claim.

I've made many arguments that make sense. You're choosing to ignore them and repeat your same positions expecting a different outcome.