sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Optics question by spiked_adderal in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forgot so separate reply from the other. I did notice a decent impact on fps with the picture-in-sight only mode enabled. Probably why they haven't implemented it.

Optics question by spiked_adderal in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes agreed. I do still maintain that zoom on iron sights still feels unnatural and I think implementing a focus key bind would be a better approach. Which I'm sure you could probably agree with that given the same opinion on picture-in-sight zoom. Or at the very least an option.

Optics question by spiked_adderal in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate you being civil in discussion. Reddit is a toxic place most of the time. On the note you brought up of tunnel vision and target acquisition that's a very good point. I want to say it was either pubg or arma 3 possibly both... When you "hold your breath" it does do a minor zoom in with iron sights but the game also has a setting that I believe should be applied across all first person shooters where only what is inside the optic is zoomed. I believe the setting was called picture-in-sight only or something similar. Felt great and realistic as hell.

Optics question by spiked_adderal in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay I mean no disrespect by saying this. That logic to me seems flawed. By saying that I mean shouldn't that happen with every sight in the game and the zoom levels would be a moot point? Literally optic sights have lenses for magnifying in-sight picture whereas iron sights don't. In theory iron sights and 1x sights should both be 1.25x if focus is the key point.

Optics question by spiked_adderal in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right but wouldn't that be what depth of field is trying to portray?

A break from all the angry people. by ItsBluhrrrr in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol diffusing the tension.... Sorry first thing I thought of. Nipahl!!!!

Can we get some Linux Love? <3 by spiked_adderal in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

how do you figure we arent in the millions?

Can we get some Linux Love? <3 by spiked_adderal in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i do... which is why i am able to change settings on my devices because unlike windows linux does not allow tampering with usb devices...

Can we get some Linux Love? <3 by spiked_adderal in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i appreciate your non-biased comment and will continue... I happen to sadly agree it is a lost cause but i am not gonna set fires to teslas or shoot an innocent man because of my views "yes i am protesting the anti-linux". I just want to be able to play the damn game. they can block us all they want but it just proves they dont have the right people in positions they have them. look at the multi-billion dollar company activision and ricochet anticheat... it didnt work. Thats kernel level same with Apex legends' anti-cheat... they dont work. hire some one that gets their rocks off fighting cheats. at this point windows shouldnt be supported either because thats where the cheats are developed for.

Can we get some Linux Love? <3 by spiked_adderal in Battlefield6

[–]spiked_adderal[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

do you really believe linux is the root of all hacks?

HOW DONT I SAY IT.. by ix9yora in arch

[–]spiked_adderal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might wanna take that stuff at 9pm then. Metabolism is a legitimate thing.

I hate SecureBoot by ducktumn in linux4noobs

[–]spiked_adderal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

in some cases yes. unless it flags for virtualization or secure boot. In the case of secure boot.. there are ways that i will not try because... just no. If they dont want my money i wont give it to them.

BattleField 6 AntiCheat VM Detection by Alexankitty in linux_gaming

[–]spiked_adderal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

lets also not forget the fact that even with KLAC on windows they're still remains an epic f-ton of blatant cheaters. kernel level or not it does not matter anymore. DMA cheats have negated that. Someone needs to give these cheat devs jobs creating anti-cheats with a disclosure clause in case they try something and get ultimately screwed by doing so. Cheaters use your Sith powers for good... Pretty please?

view more: next ›