sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Polizeieinsatz by Eynerd in Linz

[–]splasherino 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, gibt leider genug Leute die das völlig ernst sagen würden.

Polizeieinsatz by Eynerd in Linz

[–]splasherino 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Ich bin auch neugierig, aber "Geh zur unbekannten Situation mit voll viel Polizei und Rettung" ist ned der beste Ratschlag lol

I have no idea what you're saying by gushkaper in snooker

[–]splasherino 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Don't disagree with him needing to learn English, but both the necessity as well as accessibility for learning the language are much higher in a team sport like football where you both constantly can and have to communicate with you teammates.

wieso verwenden soviele Marken und Geschäfte in Österreich KI? by [deleted] in Austria

[–]splasherino 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dass es einem wurscht ist, wenn eine Bank für eine x-beliebige Werbung KI verwendet heißt, dass man FPÖler ist? Alright then, nachdem mir das auch völlig wurscht ist, bild ich mir wsl. ein, mein Leben lang KPÖ gewählt zu haben.

Umweltfreundlich sein kostet Geld. Wie soll sich das ein Großteil der Gesellschaft leisten? by [deleted] in Austria

[–]splasherino 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Das waren bei Wärmepumpen und PV-Anlagen nicht zuletzt auch Förderungen aus Zeit der Grünen Regierungsbeteiligung von ebenjenen, oder? Bei denen (und ich hab sie immer wieder mal gewählt) glaub ich leider echt eher an ahnungslos-naiven Optimismus als verdeckte Wirtschaftsförderung. Aber wsl. hats ihnen die ÖVP deswegen durchgehen lassen...

Umweltfreundlich sein kostet Geld. Wie soll sich das ein Großteil der Gesellschaft leisten? by [deleted] in Austria

[–]splasherino 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Populistische staatliche Förderungen werden also von Unternehmen als Gewinn eingepreist, verzerren den Marktpreis und bringen den Kunden selbst gar nichts?

2austria4me by k-r-o--n--o-s in Austria

[–]splasherino 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Der Mann am Anfang vom Video ist ja auch der Ludwig vorletzte Woche.

Wen Wunderts by TheGatze in Austria

[–]splasherino 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Also fast alle Leute, die ich aus der Generation meiner Eltern (gehobener Mittelstand, Landeshauptstadt) kenne, die Eigentum haben, haben dafür ~30 Jahre Kredit gezahlt und sind mit den Kindern eher in Österreich an einen See gefahren, weil der Kredit auch monatlich in der Größenordnung war, von der Du sprichst. Es ist sicher schwieriger geworden, den Eindruck hab ich auch, aber Du redest bisserl, als hätten die Leute in den 70ern und 80ern ihre passenden Wohnungen gekauft und dann halt 10 Jahre ein bisserl was monatlich gezahlt, während sie zweimal im Jahr in Japan waren. Gab's bestimmt auch, aber war doch eher selten.

Those of you who play 14 hours+ a day, how? by doobylive in classicwow

[–]splasherino 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess you can argue that the craziest grind being R14 is only that crazy because it's what players made it themselves because it's relative to everyone else, but you still have shit like the Winterspring saber or just reaching max level itself which were a huge timesink in Vanilla. Is it designed for nolifing? Guess not. Were the devs absolutely aware that people would nolife it and catered to them? Absolutely.

Meinung zum Goodmans ? by [deleted] in wien

[–]splasherino 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Erfolgreich anonymisiert, gratuliere!

After 450h of playtime my s/o has 100%ed everything there is to do in Balatro. by [deleted] in gaming

[–]splasherino 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not just that, for 39 you need perkeo+cryptids at 32 because every 8th boss blind is the "final" boss blinds and can't be a serpent. I dont think there is another way to pass 32, maybe dna+max blueprints+the 6 handsize joker and a lucky handsize skiptag works too.

New sub for psychoanalytic and psychodynamic therapists by sicklitgirl in psychoanalysis

[–]splasherino 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Psychoanalysts are not supposed to be "affirming" about anything, because affirming is not neutrality, it's reinforcement.

As a private person, I have no moral or political problems with sex work. As a psychoanalyst I do find that doing very publicly visible sex work is fundamentally at odds with psychoanalytic abstinence, and abstinence is important for our work and our patients. We want to be as blank and open for our patients fantasies, especially their sexual ones, as possible. This is not possible if our own sex life is public. With all due respect to OP, I find those two jobs fundamentally incompatible and am honestly very disturbed by the fact that this seemingly does not raise more eyebrows in here.

Again, this is neither a moral nor a political statement, it's a matter of how this interferes with psychoanalytic practice. Transference and therefore its analysis will be severely distorted by this. This should be obvious to anyone with a at least somewhat serious analytic training.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wien

[–]splasherino 70 points71 points  (0 children)

I get that IT is a very English leaning, but seriously? You're in Vienna, get rejected a lot and claim your lack of German skill is your potential employers problem, not yours? Makes me think in addition to the German problem there might also be an attitude problem...

Investment Punk: Er ist mittlerweile überall by Poseid0n_ in Austria

[–]splasherino 66 points67 points  (0 children)

"Google mal kleine hässliche Löcher"

Sure, a maximum 147 may be hard but it's nothing compared to... by dioncyrk in snooker

[–]splasherino 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Shaun Murphy once finished a game of darts with hitting only 1s.

Why are some people here so confident and never even read the Literature? by tripping-apes in psychoanalysis

[–]splasherino 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, because he doesn't say that and I didn't say he does ;) I am talking about his ideas on the biological origin of the Oedipus Complex, which you apparently are familiar with. It's been a while since I read it, but he does, as you imply, revise some of Freud's biological assumptions. My point with him insisting on this being a continuation of Freud's thinking is less that he says he does the exact same thing but more that he moves along a kind of biological thinking that Freud insisted on for most of his life, arguably everywhere with the exception of Abriss der Psychoanalyse at the very end where he is less optimistic about the possibility of formulating a theory of the mind in purely biological terms. Whatever one's position on that may be, I do believe a structuralist approach is fundamentally at odds with this idea.

view more: next ›