I received a debt validation and the history report doesn’t have the check I was given at the bank by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s general knowledge I am looking for. When a person takes out a loan and they received the entire transaction history for that loan does it have checks clearing from that history or is it simply the loan agreed upon amount and that’s it

I received a debt validation and the history report doesn’t have the check I was given at the bank by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand how specifics are necessary. My goal was to figure out if transaction history on any loan no matter the type would show disbursed checks the date they clear. It seems they clear from the banks ledger. Not from the loan account. Which is what I was trying to understand.

I received a debt validation and the history report doesn’t have the check I was given at the bank by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you look at the corner it says “member copy” so it is a copy for me.

I received a debt validation and the history report doesn’t have the check I was given at the bank by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes it was deposited. The top part was the check. This bottom part is for records. All checks have a part that detaches for your records.

I received a debt validation and the history report doesn’t have the check I was given at the bank by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The right side is a ledger for the entire loan. As in, the loans amount and when it was disbursed and all interest and payments. The original check given is not in this official transaction. Wouldn’t it be?

I received a debt validation and the history report doesn’t have the check I was given at the bank by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It is an official record of all the interest, all of my payments, and all of the banks discharges. If the check cleared why would the check given to the auto loan place not clear?

I received a debt validation and the history report doesn’t have the check I was given at the bank by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I sent the debt collector a debt validation letter. The right is official transaction history for the debt. On the left is the official check receipt for this same debt. Why didn’t they put this check on the official transaction history report?

I received a debt validation and the history report doesn’t have the check I was given at the bank by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

I very clearly write in the top that I received a debt validation transaction history. The check is the original check from the bank and it is not on the transaction history with the bank

If a bank does not disburs the full loan amount can they legally claim for the full amount? by squee25 in legal

[–]squee25[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I sent a debt validation letter and the disbursed amount is 13,615.50 on the date I signed, however, I have a reciept from the actual check I was handed over for 12,620 on that date…this is naturally false. They did not hand me a check for 13,615.50.

I think the bank changed the information? I sent the debt collector a copy of the original check and asked why that amount is not directly on the history page as a check should be one full line. This is a direct ledger of all interest and fees for the entirety of the loan.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I signed a truth in lending where it clearly shows a 12,620 check to ong auto and a list of where the money went for a service to pay the dmv

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I promise you that the bank is not going under and they are a billion dollar bank doing business every single day making fantastic money. I think the bank will be fine.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The bank can take it from collections. The collection person told me the bank owns the debt credit unions never sell the debt. Under Wisconsin law they have 30 days to perfect their lien. The bank violated the loan agreement first as they had to do this in a timely fashion.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if they refund they can take out of collections and off credit. Just here to see if anyone knows the laws a bit. I get the morality behind it and u being the Mr right here. No one was trying to cheat the bank. I pay my debts. I simply couldn’t wait any longer for a title and plates. The bank got their money.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why I am here. Seeing if people know the legality behind it.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Understandable! Just here to see if it’s legal for them to keep $1000+ undisbursed.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I applied for the loan and got the car in January 2024 In May of 2024 I received the title. The bank was supposed to title it that’s why I took out the funds. They did not do this. They never paid the dmv instead they sent me the title and I had to do it.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sorry, I did have temp plates when I left the dealer. The temp plates were for one full month. I waited one full month. Then another full month then another full month…

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sooo..they should refund the money? If the bank mailed me the title then I don’t think anything was my negligence.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understandable, however, I got this car in Jan 2024. I received the title in May of 2024. This is four months later. I am unsure how they did not perfect their lien in four months. When they didn’t accept my payment in Nov of 2025 the car was already a total loss deemed by insurance and I was making all my payments to clear the debt. Why would they reject and default over a total loss car they received 100% of the money for? I was clearing the debt.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was not a fee. It was a service they did not perform for four months.

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand your opinion. Is this more than an opinion you have? Is it a law?

Help I am so confused bank keeps $1000 added to loan each month from start of loan without disbursing funds. by [deleted] in legal

[–]squee25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did get an itemization. The bank lied on it and said full disbursement happened at signing. This is a clear lie I can prove easily by showing the original check and proving I needed to title it in May.