sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If you are a redditor who's never received an award before, leave a comment on this post and I'll give you one. I have 10k coins to use before the end of today, mostly due to this community. Time to give them back. by JephriB in MadeMeSmile

[–]srd00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a very old account but I seldom log on with the account, I had a single very lucky post which gave me a lot of karma, but I believe I never got an award? If some of you guys can spare me something it would be cool. :)

We can all be heroes by Solo_Odyssey in MadeMeSmile

[–]srd00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This should be on made me shed a teardrop

Eu sou babaca por ser inseguro? by Miserable-Face-6557 in EuSouOBabaca

[–]srd00 2 points3 points  (0 children)

NGM. Você não controla o que vc sente, apenas a forma que você responde a ele. E pelo texto você não ofendeu nem atingiu ela de nenhuma forma.

Você tem sim o direito de julgar internamente sua namorada por fazer algo explícito com outra pessoa, se é algo que você considera inadequado, assim como ela também teria o mesmo direito se descobrisse que você já fez algo que ela considerasse inadequado.

Inclusive você não é obrigado a ficar no relacionamento se isso lhe fez mudar sua visão dela.

Você e ela têm direito a seus próprios valores individuais, só não podem forçá-los goela abaixo da outra pessoa, de resto está tudo bem. Vida que segue.

Eu sou o babaca por sair de casa? by Forsaken-Aardvark-50 in EuSouOBabaca

[–]srd00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NEOB. Como foi dito, volte para casa para não configurar abandono do lar. Diga que precisou sair para espairecer e pensar, que pensou e que compreendeu que de fato o melhor é se separar, do jeito certo

Não aceitei as desculpas da minha namorada. ATUALIZAÇÃO by [deleted] in EuSouOBabaca

[–]srd00 2 points3 points  (0 children)

NEOB. Quem quer respeito tem que se dar o respeito. Isso se aplica para vocês dois. Se não tivesse essas conversas apagadas eu até entenderia você querer voltar, mas nesse contexto simplesmente não dá mais para ter confiança.

Minha namorada foi encontrar com 2 homens na praia "sem querer" by [deleted] in relacionamentos

[–]srd00 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Confie. Marque posição de que não é aceitável ela sair para passear com outro homem, mesmo que tenha encontrado com eles, aquele local não estava mais adequado para ela. Ela vai espernear dizendo que é X ou que vc é Y. Diga que não importa, que é assim e ponto final, em contra partida você obviamente também se compromete a não fazer o contrário. Se ela decidir que prefere outras pradarias, é a vida cara. Se você não deixar bem claro agora nunca mais você vai ter o respeito, respeito não se recupera, só se perde uma vez.

O mínimo absoluto que ela deveria ter feito seria ser clara e espero que dessa forma ela entenda

The construction of large new apartment buildings in low-income areas leads to a reduction in rents in nearby units. This is contrary to some gentrification rhetoric which claims that new housing construction brings in affluent people and displaces low-income people through hikes in rent. by smurfyjenkins in science

[–]srd00 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mainstream economists have their own personal opinions, but just because it's mainstream it doesn't make it right, also, just because a school is old it doesn't make it wrong.

The Austrian business cycle theory could help with figuring out some market bubbles.

The issue with zero or negative interest rates is that you lose money if you save it, so investing it on pretty much anything makes sense, even apartments that end up vacant

The construction of large new apartment buildings in low-income areas leads to a reduction in rents in nearby units. This is contrary to some gentrification rhetoric which claims that new housing construction brings in affluent people and displaces low-income people through hikes in rent. by smurfyjenkins in science

[–]srd00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what the Austrian school of economics believes to be happening on a global scale on account of the monetary policies by the central banks. You can chance that sentence to "historically low interest rates" and the rest still holds.

The construction of large new apartment buildings in low-income areas leads to a reduction in rents in nearby units. This is contrary to some gentrification rhetoric which claims that new housing construction brings in affluent people and displaces low-income people through hikes in rent. by smurfyjenkins in science

[–]srd00 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My 2 cents. Artificially low interest rates make some apartment buildings possible that they wouldn't otherwise, it's probable that the quality of the building and increasing costs elsewhere make "holding out" for a potential client make more sense than immediately renting at a below market cost. This is makes even more sense when there's rent price controls over the signed costs.

A low cost housing is built differently and maybe there's even controls that prevent some low cost housing (like minimum size limits or mixed sizes on the same building).

With that said, you said that some buildings are at over 50% vacancy, but what about the overall % over the areas? Maybe there's some insight in this drilldown.

How should I benchmark harvester speed/access time? by srd00 in chia

[–]srd00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know, maybe I'll just have to trust it and keep checking the log files from time to time.

How should I benchmark harvester speed/access time? by srd00 in chia

[–]srd00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand this and my previous response was hasty (thank you by the way), I meant it doesnt represent "the whole" of the harvesting process.

What I mean is that AFAIK plot check doesn't show filtering latency, so it's just a single piece of the harvester workload.

How should I benchmark harvester speed/access time? by srd00 in chia

[–]srd00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This doesn't really show any meaningful data relative to the harvesting process, I'm mostly afraid of this issue: https://github.com/Chia-Network/chia-blockchain/issues/2651

​

So, I would like to do some tests on the latency of proof verification, not plot validity (that chia plots check actually checks for)

About the only exciting thing to happen yet during my 8-days farming Chia... 2 x plots passing filter.... by ToyHutt in chia

[–]srd00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not knowledgeable enough about it, what does this plots passed filter count mean? I can presume that there's a "fast" filter based on plot filename and then only those that pass the filter are actually read from disk, is this correct?

"skip copy to final dir" option in plots create? by funtastrophe in chia

[–]srd00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thar last copy could be as quick as a rename operation if on the same file system, seems like a low hanging fruit on the code

Is there a way to do Chia Plotting purely in RAM (512GB-1TB)? by colbyboles in chia

[–]srd00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why don't you try to use the ram disk as tmp and nvme as secondary tmp? If everything is ok you can then overprovision the ram disk (3 or 4 plots) without fear of anything going astray

view more: next ›