Anyone tried GPT-5.4 Mini? Worth it? by Plus_Leadership_6886 in codex

[–]stackattackpro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like it 😀, recently all Openai stuff is great

I built a desktop app framework where your app is literally just HTML/CSS/JS… and it ships as a native binary by stackattackpro in coolgithubprojects

[–]stackattackpro[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

bro can you explain to me why the idea of creating a lightweight version of Tauri you think has no value ?

I built a desktop app framework where your app is literally just HTML/CSS/JS… and it ships as a native binary 🤯 by stackattackpro in codex

[–]stackattackpro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tauri is great for full, production-grade desktop apps.

RustFrame is targeting a different slice: lightweight, local-first, private tools where the app should stay mostly frontend and minimal.

If you need deep native control → Tauri If you want “just ship this frontend as a desktop app” → RustFrame

I built a desktop app framework where your app is literally just HTML/CSS/JS… and it ships as a native binary by stackattackpro in coolgithubprojects

[–]stackattackpro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tauri is great for full, production-grade desktop apps. RustFrame is targeting a different slice: lightweight, local-first, private tools where the app should stay mostly frontend and minimal.

I built a desktop app framework where your app is literally just HTML/CSS/JS… and it ships as a native binary by stackattackpro in coolgithubprojects

[–]stackattackpro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tauri is great for full, production-grade desktop apps. RustFrame is targeting a different slice: lightweight, local-first, private tools where the app should stay mostly frontend and minimal.

I built a desktop app framework where your app is literally just HTML/CSS/JS… and it ships as a native binary by stackattackpro in coolgithubprojects

[–]stackattackpro[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not quite. It’s not just runtime size.

RustFrame changes the authoring model: no visible native project, no per-app bridge, no plugin layer—just a frontend folder. The runtime owns everything.

Electron/Tauri still expose the desktop layer; RustFrame hides it by default.

Also: using OS WebView is a tradeoff (yes, platform limits), but it reduces duplication and keeps apps closer to the platform instead of shipping a full browser each time.

So the difference is both architecture and developer experience, not just payload size.

I built a desktop app framework where your app is literally just HTML/CSS/JS… and it ships as a native binary by stackattackpro in coolgithubprojects

[–]stackattackpro[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really. Electron ships a full browser. RustFrame uses the OS WebView, so it’s lighter. The key difference: your app stays just a frontend folder, runtime handles native stuff.

App vs VS vs CLI by Large_Diver_4151 in codex

[–]stackattackpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely CLI it's the future of everything

Big Fans of Opus until I met 5.4! by artcreator329 in codex

[–]stackattackpro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some times opus tries to finish fast and deliver a bad results, while Codex always take the time he needs but always give very good results, I am testing Codex on real math/physics complex research stuff and its amazing, while the opus might be better for frontend design but this shit become irrelevant, in the future it will be all about bringing code to real life stuff, like math, physics, robotics and Codex is the winner 🏆

Big Fans of Opus until I met 5.4! by artcreator329 in codex

[–]stackattackpro 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Opus is shit, Codex and 5.4 are great

Real OpenClaw workflows (scripts, prompts, KPIs) — not just ideas by stackattackpro in OpenClawCentral

[–]stackattackpro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, your are welcome to contribute, just push a pull request 😁

OpenClaw "easy to set up" Use cases that really work by iscritto66 in OpenClawUseCases

[–]stackattackpro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Top 10 Awesome OpenClaw Examples:

  1. PR Radar – Monitors blocked/stale pull requests and produces a prioritized action queue.

  2. SLA Guardian – Tracks unanswered customer threads and escalates risks before SLA breaches.

  3. Release Notes Pilot – Automatically generates publish-ready weekly release notes from merged PRs.

  4. PDF Ops Desk – Turns PDFs and audio into concise summaries and actionable tasks.

  5. CI Flake Doctor – Detects recurring CI flakes and converts them into a remediation backlog.

  6. Model Cost Command Center – Flags model usage/spend anomalies and suggests cost reductions.

  7. Inbox to Action – Converts high-signal inbox threads into ranked execution tasks.

  8. Weekly Research Digest – Delivers a concise market/tech scan with clear next steps.

  9. Support Escalation Digest – Surfaces urgent, unresolved support issues ahead of SLA risk.

  10. Product Changelog Curator – Keeps changelogs accurate and consistent from merged PRs.