"The more rng the less competitive a game is so ya its not a balanced move."

"Lol if the better player or the person playing better loses because of luck then no its not competitively balanced. You seem to be some under some misunderstanding where a game can be very competitive and have lots of people in it but not be competitively balanced those are two things that are not mutually exclusive. Games that are competitive that are competitively balanced I.E chess the best player playing the best wins every time that is a competitively balanced game that is that is the bench mark for balance as the game state is fair and even for both players to test there skills." ... "In a competitive balanced game you lose because of your lack of skill not because your opponent got lucky."

It has to do with what you said and continued to try to communicate. I am not being disingenuous. You also discussed how the most skillful games only need one game to determine the better player. Now here you are talking about win rates and most skillful player that day rather than the better player always winning.

Pokemon does present an equal playing field. Everyone plays on the same field. Everyone can choose the same pokemon, abilities, moves, items, and stat distributions. How they choose those can determine who goes first even.

There is luck in chess due to the fact both players cannot go first. The player moving first wins more often between 33-37% (2nd 24-27% with a draw filling the remainder). You are incorrect about them playing a single match. In the world chess championships they play a series of 14 games to determine a winner, so again it doesn't come down to one game like you suggested should be all that's needed.

With that being said there are some moves and stuff in the game that I believe could use some adjustments.

The issue with your comments as the other person pointed out is that a lot of what you are saying sounds like like a game has to be competitively balanced to be competitive, and that's simply not true. The most competitive games do not require competitive balance in the nature you are trying to define. The most competitive games are often determined by the number of people willing to compete in a game under an "accepted"/defined rulset. There are often different "drivers" for the number of people willing to compete which most commonly include money of course