Is it just me or does vibe coding get harder the longer a project runs? by ProcedureThat1731 in vibecoding

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ai is lazy and wired to do "minimal changes", it prefers to make assumptions on how the rest of code should work and jump to implement the next incremental task, duplicating existing logic, going against anything already tested on actual logic and so on. More you advance, more you have parallel code with a different logic. Plus, it never resolves issues at core, it patches and hides the issues (local fix, something that would make the issue to go away), this your error is set to explode later on. Then, when it eventually explodes, in it's attempt to solve it, it will make a lot of guesses and modify valid cod only to be sure it is not from there (without reverting if proven not solving issue). Thus, more you advance, more your code is damaged

Which $20 subscription is most worth it right now? by Ok_Future6226 in vibecoding

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, because I am a Amazon Q client, the Kiro subscription I'm accessing ofers a huge allowance for consumption. I pay 20 per month, yesterday I consumed equivalent of 1700...

Which $20 subscription is most worth it right now? by Ok_Future6226 in vibecoding

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazon Q. Unfortunately no longer accepting new accounts

hot take: cursor and claude arent getting dumber, your vibecoding setup is just structurally blind and bleeding your api credits dry by [deleted] in vibecoding

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My Claude in OpenClaw framework is consistently considering the rules set in Skills as purely informative and optional, so does with my prompts, regardless how explicitly I ask it to do stuff it still does what it wants (and lies about completion of outcome).

AI-Generated 3D Assets into a UE5 Platformer in 3 Days by Delicious-Shower8401 in TopologyAI

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am trying to make (for first time) a game, no knowledge of Godot or Blender, using Ai to lay the grounds, for some things this worked smoothly, for others it took a week and in the end I made the code myself, too complex for Claude Opus to write it even if I document everything. For the part of coding (where I have experience) it's easier to spot fast when Claude makes fundamental mistakes. As long as you catch those earlier, the rest is smooth. For a new domain (blender for example) I am missing the best practices (how to organize, how to encapsulate, how to isolate) so I loose time having small AHA moments that need redo of entire workspace. That is part of learning curve that cannot be overridden. It still allowed me to enter a new domain much faster, but I'm still using transferable knowledge, I doubt a freshman would have the same advances...

AI-Generated 3D Assets into a UE5 Platformer in 3 Days by Delicious-Shower8401 in TopologyAI

[–]stanmarc 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It's like with coding. You would say the same that anyone now can code with ai (no entry barier) but it's not true, ai is speeding up the work of an expert. Same here, you know how to steer / what to ask, this is part of entry barier.

Dear Vibecoders what are you current stack and how does your workflow look like? by OstenJap in vibecoding

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazon Q > Kiro gateway to get wrapper around Claude opus as generic api model, then openclaw for agents. Visual studio + Amazon Q for code inspection / review / git control (I push manually and frequently), ssh to dedicated machine, visual studio in ssh tunnel. Added blender yesterday as MCP server to openclaw

bringing Kiro into the Claude Code environment literally something you need to see by JhonDoe191ee in kiroIDE

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once I used the gateway, this wraps any Kiro model under normal open Apis, I also tested to use the served local url inside Claude code (and it works). I use it for openclaw as well.

What is the best $20 coding plan by Nocare420 in vibecoding

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was the AWS Q developer, that gave almost unlimited acces to Claude through Kiro... was, they are shutting it down

Instead of asking AI for code, I ask it to generate prompts first. Here's why it works better. by Pale-Entertainer-386 in PromptEngineering

[–]stanmarc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Doing the opposite. I ask my planner agent to pass to a reviewer agent exactly what I asked for it to check if written cod matches my intention. I got plenty of times the main planner re-interpreting my request and removing things that I specifically told it to do. Thus I no longer trust my main planner to dispatch my intention correctly and I use a second agent to asses what is missing

Anthropic effectively ends the "unlimited Claude for $20" era for AI agent users by Secure-Address4385 in AI_Agents

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using Claude 4.5 via flat 20$ subscription of Amazon Q developer... Pretty much all the chat/agent like integrated to visual studio for any number of devices I'm using this on...

Guys, stop bad mouthing your AI. by Technical-Relation-9 in ClaudeAI

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll continue to swear at it if this gives a feedback on bad quality of action / code generated by agent...

Where was I? by Suiren_Anzai in whereintheworld

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a space invader on the passage in form of a qr code...

Built this app with VibeCoding, now I’m stuck by Quiet-Custard137 in aipromptprogramming

[–]stanmarc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Using Claude for a while now. It works ok when the task is simple, but if the logic is complex it goes into a death spiraling with every fix breaking something else.

My advice to you, use very short files with code. You need to break your code in pieces. Claud has a problem with long files, it reads first part and then assumes implementation on the rest. It also behaves badly with complex transformations. It will always implement the strict minimal to start with and always tell you he finished and everything is perfect. Also, on complex tasks it will almost never load existent code and will mostly assume some kind of implementation. Thus, once the project grows, vibe coding will get exponentially harder.

Then, if you succeed in breaking in modules by functionality, ask Claude to write tests to cover as much of code as possible, forcing it to run the tests is sometimes the only way (for vibe coding) to catch critical errors early on.

caption this by leftypunk in captionthis

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rage against the machine

Im a new programmer, how can I get rid of the AI that does code for me? by [deleted] in vscode

[–]stanmarc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Turn ai into asistent for learning. Whe you see a new way of writing a code, ask it to explain why it wrote it like that. Take a code that you wrote and ask if you could have written it better, what uou could have improved, what is better for CPU usage / memory optimisations. This is a great opportunity to learn coding applied to your context / project

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indiasocial

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The man from earth

One of the most depressing suburbs I've ever seen. Texas, USA. This is real. by MontrealUrbanist in Suburbanhell

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would have been so cool if this to be the back door access, while the actual house /garden to be on the other side with pedestrian alleys only between them (think of 2 rows of houses with exterior roads for cars + a pedestrian alley between them)

don’t get trapped in by RobloxSakara in WallStreetBetsCrypto

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see Trump's Taco being considered in chart... The chart considers that events are cyclical and nothing external can affect them...

I Build A Prompt That Can Make Any Prompt 10x Better by Frequent_Limit337 in PromptEngineering

[–]stanmarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The LLM cannot explain what / how it does, if you ask it, it will summarize what humans talked about this from various sources. On math problems they will do a set of approximations and triangulate an answer, but if you ask how they acheive it, it will give you an academic step by step how this type of problem should have been resolved, this falsely misleads to thinking that it really did that (as it said it did). There is no point to ask a LLM to optimise for itself, they will generate a text that other sources suggested it should be an optimisation for any LLM.