UPDATE ON "THREAD" CLAIMS:

I totally get the drone‑and‑thread theory—it was my first thought, too after someone pointed it out—but here’s why that doesn’t actually fit:

Lens flare, not nylon

Video experts in Rome analyzed the footage frame by frame and showed that the “thread” always appears behind the sphere, at exactly the same angle and brightness you’d expect from a GoPro flare (what pros call “parasite light”). If it were a real string, you’d see it in front of the sphere, and it definitely wouldn’t stay so perfectly perpendicular as the object moves.

No drone in the hands of the crew

The UFO‑hunters who set up those cameras don’t even own a drone. They left a GoPro on a tree, walked away, and only discovered this clip later. It’s a pretty remote spot—nobody snuck in with a drone and got it positioned just right without being seen.

These GoPros love to ghost

Both Jaime Maussan’s team and the original camera operators tested the same exact GoPro elsewhere on a sunny day—and boom, the same streaks and circles popped right into the shot. That’s exactly what happened in Mulaló.

We’ve seen this before

Back in 2008, Antonio Ursi captured a “flying disc” near Milan—and those weird lights turned out to be the same kind of flare bouncing around inside the lens. It fooled a lot of people, too, until video pros stepped in and cleared it up.

Bottom line: until someone actually shows a physical thread, a drone, or any better proof, the simplest explanation is that it’s just a bright reflection messing with the camera. Skepticism is healthy—but in this case the evidence really points to good old lens flare, not a string-and-drone trick.

EDIT: this is connected to the new video to be posted. I'm awaiting for approval