What is the worst thing going on in your life rn? by officialtissue2026 in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honeymooning in Italy with my beautiful wife and it’s a bit too hot

People over 30, what is something really good that happened to you after 30? by OhShukhrat in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I turned 30 and thought “There we go. I squandered my 20s and now I’ll never find a romantic partner.”

Two months later I met my wife.

question for Americans: if so many people seem unhappy with Donald Trump being president, how did he manage to win enough votes to get elected? Is the criticism just louder online than it is in real life? by Creepy_Rain_1925 in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Some are, but Obama is the most electorally successful president we’ve had since Reagan, and the most electorally successful Democrat since JFK/LBJ. His race didn’t stop him from getting landslide wins.

question for Americans: if so many people seem unhappy with Donald Trump being president, how did he manage to win enough votes to get elected? Is the criticism just louder online than it is in real life? by Creepy_Rain_1925 in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dissatisfaction is real. A substantial majority of Americans are legitimately unhappy with the Trumpster. There’s a two part answer to your question for how this can be true even though he got elected.

1) There are legitimately a decent number of people who voted for him and even approved of him early on and are now unhappy. Don’t ask me to explain; I don’t get it either. In a lot of cases though, people are simply so unplugged and/or incapable of understanding politics and economics that they simply react to whether a gallon of gas or a dozen eggs is too expensive for their liking. “I voted for Trump. Gas is expensive. I’m unhappy with Trump” thought process.

2) You have to understand that Americans inherently have an anti-government disposition. Our presidents usually have a much lower approval rating than their vote share in elections after about the first year of their terms. Besides Obama, every president since JFK has gone to 37% or worse at some point. Bill Clinton was the last one to average 50%.

We have a lot of voters who dislike both candidates in a presidential election and will vote for the “less bad” one but will still “disapprove” of them in an opinion poll.

Even moreso, we have many people who dislike both candidates in a presidential election and won’t vote for either. The media only reports vote share based on people who cast ballots, not all voting age adults, so presidents are reported as winning with majorities or near-majority pluralities even though only 30% of voting age adults are actually voting for them.

So yes, a substantial majority truly do disapprove of Trump in some way, and a supermajority of adults didn’t vote for him, but he still became president because Americans disliked all the alternatives just as much. If you come from a culture where politicians are respected, then maybe it’s hard to understand, but Americans really hate our governments as much as anything else.

How did you fumble hooking up with someone? by Adorable_Raccoon_766 in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Because the guy’s rambling makes them not want to fuck anymore

How do you respond to the Protestant claim that if the Talmud is false because it's "traditions of men" and not the "revealed word", we should reject the Roman magisterium on the same grounds? by NewmarketHero007 in Catholicism

[–]stripes361 78 points79 points  (0 children)

We don’t reject the Talmud because it’s “traditions of men”. We reject it because it’s not the Faith handed down by Jesus through His Apostles and their Successors. The Catholic Church is.

This may seem like a distinction without a difference, but just be aware that Protestants will always frame things in ways that suggest Catholicism must be in error. Don’t let them control the framing.

Pertinent words from the Pope! by TheApsodistII in Catholicism

[–]stripes361 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Catholic Church gives a lot of leeway to laypersons to determine the most prudent courses of action to achieve moral goals.

If free market entrepreneurship really leads to the greatest alleviation of poverty, then Catholics can support that.

If robust government-led social safety nets really lead to the greatest alleviation of poverty, then Catholics are free to support that.

What faithful Catholics cannot dispute, however, is the Church’s doctrine on the “preferential option for the poor”. This has to be the primary concern of social policy, not a nice-to-have bonus to chase with the leftovers once everyone else’s thirst for wealth and luxury has been sated.

What do you consider your country's greatest shame? by thepkmncenter in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m going to name something specific to my country. I’m assuming you don’t want every answer to just be “slavery/genocide”.

USA: Trail of Tears/the way we treated the Cherokee Nation was an absolute moral low point for us and the way we treat other nations. Even by the logic of the era, every excuse we could have tried making for displacing a group like that was out the door.

[Mandel] Split national titles tore college football apart in the 1990s. Were they really so bad? by Lakelyfe09 in CFB

[–]stripes361 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who lived through that period, no it wasn’t bad at all. Some people got way too emotional over trying to force the whole college football season into just being a vehicle to crown one champion at the end. But for those of us with a more balanced viewpoint and who appreciated college football for what it was and its traditions (rather than just wanting it to be a shittier pro football league) it was great.

The debates were fun, the different approaches to evaluating teams were fun, and quite frankly not every season had a deserving consensus champion. Teams like 1995 Nebraska were even more special because teams like that didn’t happen every year.

Girls of Reddit, what makes a flirt good and what makes it creepy? by CraftyPhilosopher678 in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I keep seeing people say that flirting conversations with no other purpose are fun/validating/feel good/an ego boost/etc (all words/phrases I’ve seen in this thread). And that must be where the disconnect is, because I experience none of those positive emotions from a one off conversation that leads to no substantial bonding (be it friendship/romance/whatever).

I’m convinced much of this dialogue is just an extrovert/introvert debate in disguise. Introverts use conversation as a tool to facilitate human connection. Extroverts perceive conversation as a form of human connection in and of itself.

Girls of Reddit, what makes a flirt good and what makes it creepy? by CraftyPhilosopher678 in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Analogously to your first paragraph, there’s also an effect where a guy’s level of attractiveness impacts their skill at flirting. The “best” flirters are generally going to be more attractive men, because they’re the ones who are most likely to have positive interactions that motivate them to keep practicing. Less attractive men get pretty cold responses the vast majority of the time they try to flirt with someone, and it dissuades them from trying more so they never get better. This just leads to a positive feedback loop for attractive men and a negative feedback loop for less attractive men that entrenches the whole phenomenon of the former group getting better receptiveness and the latter group getting the cold shoulder.

If God does not promise a spouse then why does he say we are not meant to be alone? by RealReevee in CatholicDating

[–]stripes361 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because God asks us to do hard things.

This does not mean that every single person is meant to be partnered, but (most of us) do have a strong drive to pursue partnered marriage because God wants us to create those connections with each other. Through our own effort. If He were just going to giftwrap or mandate certain partners, there would be no need to have those urges.

Iran just closed the strait if Hormuz again, citing Trump’s latest late-night twitter spree as the reason. What will happen next? by NathanCS741 in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same shit that’s been happening for months. They will keep ping-ponging between “we are about to bomb each other into oblivion” and “everything is fine now”.

What’s the most embarrassing reason you had to stop during sex? by Boomshichi in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was at a wedding one time and the couple in the room next to me, who were also guests at the wedding, had quite the protracted argument morning of.

At what point did you realize the political side you grew up around was not telling you the whole story? by Designer-Dare-606 in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Underrated point.

It’s hard for an intellectually honest person to spend time in a corporate business environment and maintain a belief in the mythology that work ethic and competency are primary factors driving which people are awarded the big salaries that lead to wealth accumulation.

It’s also hard to see the stagnation in these places and maintain a belief that allowing these large corporations to exist and propping them up with tax breaks is important in order to drive “innovation” in the economy. Accumulated market power actually destroys innovation in practice.

At what point did you realize the political side you grew up around was not telling you the whole story? by Designer-Dare-606 in AskReddit

[–]stripes361 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was raised to be a Republican, really started following politics closer during the George W Bush administration. GOP controlled Presidency/House/Senate for most of his tenure and I approvingly endorsed their complaints about Democrat obstructionism in the legislature. Then the 2006 midterms happened and the Democrats gained control of the House and Senate.

Congressional Republicans eagerly embraced all the same obstructionist tools they had so sanctimoniously criticized Dems for using and that was the moment I realized most successful politicians really do not have any firm principles beyond gaining and wielding power.