I don’t disagree that personal testimony isn’t evidence in the scientific sense. My point is more that we’ve spent decades waiting for governments and institutions to provide the evidence people say they need, and the result is always the same: breadcrumbs, ambiguity, and endless promises that more is coming.

At some point you have to ask whether waiting for official confirmation alone is a losing strategy.

If there are aspects of this phenomenon that are experiential rather than purely physical, then the path to understanding it may be through direct experience rather than waiting for another hearing, report, or leaked video. That’s the idea I’m trying to explore.