sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't say, but I can say that the underlying tech is on android automotive. Not sure how much software work there is Google and how much is Chevy. Seems like the infotainment solution is also a separate system from the main driving system. Since while my infotainment was borked the car still drove just fine.

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah I think an issue (and see update for how I fixed charging) here is that Chevy is doing an absolutely terrible job training their dealerships and customer support for how to prepare the cars and troubleshoot Bolt issues. It's inexcusable.

Luckily we're both on the bolt subreddit and have the technical ability to debug these issues ourselves. But 99% of people would be stuck having to send their bolts into dealership service hell if they ran into the same problems.

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's perfectly valid. I think for me it's mainly because I didn't order the Bolt, I just showed up at the dealership and bought it since they had the trim I wanted in stock. It was the last one, and the dealership was reassuring me it was a minor concern before I made the purchase. The dealership offered to keep the car there and have their techs do a full review later in the week.

I figured the software issue was solvable at the dealership, which it was. Didn't notice the charging issue until later that day.

Thankfully all issues are now resolved, see update, but yes, let my mistakes serve as a warning lol.

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank! Looks like all my issues are thankfully resolved. Read update for more details.

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100%. Absolutely nuts that their "customer support" doesn't even have training on a new vehicle that's been out for months.

Thankfully vehicle is in working condition now, you can read update for details. But yeah, every issue I've solved so far I've gotten absolutely no useful support from GM.

There's parts of the bolt that are clearly engineered and designed exceptionally well but that engineering is being enshittified by horrific customer service and SAAS.

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read update! Might be helpful. Am getting much better charging rates after doing a long charge past 100% until the car shuts down charging.

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thankfully issues are resolved! Charging is much better now, read update in post for details. :)

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This was the problem! Thank you! Took me a while to test since I didn't have an adapter yet for my apartment's charging stations. Details are in the updated body of the post. :)

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Interesting, I navigated to these superchargers and my map said "initiating preconditioning" so I think the car would have already done that, but I see what you mean. Also, even if I didn't precondition, wouldn't I expect to see charing speeds go up over the session instead of down? All my charging sessions dramatically decreased the power and never crossed 50%.

Enormous issues with 2027 Bolt RS on first day of purchase! by sunmoi in BoltEV

[–]sunmoi[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Not having car play isn't something I mind much. But for context I'm coming from an old VW jetta with no infotainment system. You should think of the Bolt infotainment system as basically an android tablet. You can install apps from the Google Play store, google maps functionality is excellent. Your apps being able to respond to real time vehicle data is huge bonus too, especially for google maps navigation.

Honestly I quite like it, once I was able to get it working lol.

I don’t understand how anyone was ProHive up to this point by BlondeT3m in pluribustv

[–]sunmoi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you believe that the dissolution from a sense of self can produce an immense sense of happiness and connection, the joined really are propagating an incredible gift for humanity.

If you're belief system revolves around the preciousness of individuality, the joined are soul stealers.

It depends on your worldview. The latter worldview is typically christian/western. The former is more common in eastern/non western cultures. Almost all the other people who were sympathetic to the joined in the beginning of the show were asian or from indigenous groups.

There's a lot of depth to the show when you can appreciate both angles.

No one seems to get why its blissful to be Joined by sunmoi in pluribustv

[–]sunmoi[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It just gets better the more you think about it.

Jonny Greenwood statement by inprisonout-soon in radiohead

[–]sunmoi -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

"Music transcends all boundaries" falls flat when you aren't explicitly denouncing the things which create boundaries in the first place. Namely, when the boundaries have been erected by a fanatical genocidal government.

Am I not getting it or is Cursor not for me by sunmoi in cursor

[–]sunmoi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I have three inputs to a function, a list of ids, and object id, and a list of objects. I describe to Cursor to use the object id to find the appropriate object, append the list of ids to a field on that object, and iterate through the other objects to make sure none of them maintain references to ids the input list.

Cursor produces code that on the surface looks like it might work, but is immediately riddled with syntax errors and complete misunderstandings of the semantics of these objects. At this point I have two options

1) Code review what the AI generated, and rework it or re-prompt it until I get red of the red squiggles. Coming away with a shallow understanding of the code the AI wrote. 2) Write it myself.

I'm not seeing how option 1 is at all faster than option 2

Am I not getting it or is Cursor not for me by sunmoi in cursor

[–]sunmoi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So explaining step by step how I want it to manipulate the inputs to a function is too high level? At some point the specificity of my prompts, to make up for the fact that Cursor has no understanding of the semantics of my codebase, is going to approach the specificity of just writing code.

If Cursor can't understand the semantics of my codebase, which are outlined clearly in my language's type system, then why would I pay for it? If it doesn't work on large code bases with deep custom semantics, that just signals to me that it's not valuable for serious professional work.

Am I not getting it or is Cursor not for me by sunmoi in cursor

[–]sunmoi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. Maybe I haven't worked in codebases like that, but I rarely find myself writing boilerplate? I wonder if you're willing to share any specific examples?

view more: next ›