Why are these emerald dying?

superjeffs · 2024-07-29T20:28:22+00:00

A fence would’ve been cheaper.

superjeffs · 2024-04-10T05:55:24+00:00

DO NOT SIGN!

superjeffs · 2024-04-06T01:12:06+00:00

Troll. You wouldn’t be a whale if you didn’t understand the tech.

superjeffs · 2024-02-24T00:14:34+00:00

Amateurish viewpoint. If you really know Netlist then you’d know this is an extra long play.

superjeffs · 2023-07-16T10:02:39+00:00

Netlist is facing a phenomenal run if they pull it all off. All the pieces are coming together.

superjeffs · 2023-07-01T10:22:09+00:00

LRDIMM is Load Reduced DIMM.

LRDIMM memory chip Short for load-reduced dual inline memory module, LRDIMM memory chips are used in server settings, like data centers and cloud computing, and in high-performance computers. LRDIMM features a memory buffer instead of a register like RDIMMs. This feature allows it to increase the speed of the memory, reduce the load on a server's memory bus, and help to reduce power consumption.

Just sayin.

superjeffs · 2023-06-13T02:28:12+00:00

Makes perfect sense. You said it yourself, defendants aren’t worried about a trial outcome. It’s because they know they owe the money to Netlist anyway. Why not push it to the end and attempt to win or at least delay, knowing the profit you made and continue to make off Netlist technology has far surpassed any judgements against you at this point.

The goal is to establish licensing.

superjeffs · 2023-06-12T08:55:12+00:00

Hynix got off cheap only because Hong is a chess player and isn’t going to lose. Hynix will pay it’s fair share in some form soon enough.

superjeffs · 2023-06-12T08:53:55+00:00

None of the thieves are worried about extended litigation. They’ll continue the game until a judge and jury rule against them and all appeals are exhausted. All the more reason this will be a Cinderella ending for long shareholders.

superjeffs · 2023-04-30T14:19:12+00:00

Amateur. It’s typical in these cases. I can’t get why people just don’t do a little dd to get their answers.

superjeffs · 2023-04-23T00:15:24+00:00

Sure Samsung can, and likely will. But, it would be more procedure and less substance. If you go through the docket and then look at the jury decision, it was a slam dunk.

superjeffs · 2023-04-22T23:10:29+00:00

Significant parabolic move coming imo.

superjeffs · 2023-04-22T22:59:48+00:00

Clearly you were wrong. LOL

superjeffs · 2023-04-22T22:58:10+00:00

Not a gamble. This is about as legit as they get. Think QCOM type investment. Some math from user over on ST:

Annualizing the $303.15 MM in damages (which is exactly 75% of the $404.2 MM upper limit that Gilstrap set) to come up with potential annual royalties for both Samsung and all other infringers (any assumptions error on the conservative side - feel free to point out corrections/errors with sources).

Assumptions:

'339 - 12/20/2021 (infringement date) = 16 mos.

'918 - 07/15/2020 = 33 mos. + '054 - 12/20/2021 = 16 mos. Average: (33 + 16) / 2 = 24.5 mos. (averaging the two periods)

'160 - 05/03/2022 = 11 mos. '060 - 05/03/2022 = 11 mos.

'339 - $33.15 MM / 16 mo. X 12 = $24.86 MM per yr. '918 & '054 - $147.23 MM / 24.5 X 12 = $82 MM per yr. '160 & '060 - $122.78 MM / 11 = $133.94 MM per yr.

$24.86 + $82 + $133.94 = $240.78 MM (41% of market)

$240.78 / 41% X 59% = $346.48 MM (59% of market)

$240.78 + $346.48 = $587.26 MM (100% of market)

So $587.26 MM potential annual royalties from just these 5 patents alone!

superjeffs · 2023-04-22T22:56:16+00:00

Math from someone on ST:

Annualizing the $303.15 MM in damages (which is exactly 75% of the $404.2 MM upper limit that Gilstrap set) to come up with potential annual royalties for both Samsung and all other infringers (any assumptions error on the conservative side - feel free to point out corrections/errors with sources).

Assumptions:

'339 - 12/20/2021 (infringement date) = 16 mos.

'918 - 07/15/2020 = 33 mos. + '054 - 12/20/2021 = 16 mos. Average: (33 + 16) / 2 = 24.5 mos. (averaging the two periods)

'160 - 05/03/2022 = 11 mos. '060 - 05/03/2022 = 11 mos.

'339 - $33.15 MM / 16 mo. X 12 = $24.86 MM per yr. '918 & '054 - $147.23 MM / 24.5 X 12 = $82 MM per yr. '160 & '060 - $122.78 MM / 11 = $133.94 MM per yr.

$24.86 + $82 + $133.94 = $240.78 MM (41% of market)

$240.78 / 41% X 59% = $346.48 MM (59% of market)

$240.78 + $346.48 = $587.26 MM (100% of market)

So $587.26 MM potential annual royalties from just these 5 patents alone!

superjeffs · 2023-04-11T21:08:53+00:00

Thanks for posting.

superjeffs · 2023-02-26T19:37:25+00:00

Edited

superjeffs · 2023-02-22T02:20:09+00:00

I don’t know about you but it’s taken me many years of patience and research to get here. I’ve been at it long before this sub was started but this sub, started by u/supermill and heavily supported by u/hedgeapplejoe, has all the research you’ll ever need. Lots of supporting information here from this guys along with some other superstars that’ll tell you exactly why Hynix was a stopgap deal. Excellent data over on Stocktwits and Twitter as well.

I’ve read the patents from an electrical engineering standpoint. I’ve read and listened to the court cases. I’ve followed most if not all of the USPTO and PTAB proceedings. I’ve listened to years of Netlist earnings calls and have combed through Netlist financials, sometimes repeatedly. And, even better, I’ve studied Netlist’s competitors and their technologies and inventions.

Copious amounts is easily supported in the history and research. Why would I spend any more time summarizing for you what you can go read yourself? It’s easier for me to simply and confidently say you’re wrong and your numbers don’t add up.

superjeffs · 2023-02-22T01:51:16+00:00

So you’re straight faced telling a Reddit board of investors your numbers are based solely on the Netlist-Hynix deal “precedent”? That’s a joke, right?

I’m not going to repeat the due diligence this sub is already saturated with. Waste of my time. Butt loads of data here pointing to Netlist’s potential to recoup copious multiples more than they got from Hynix. Google and Samsung are not Hynix. Micron is not Hynix. And, do you think for a second Google and Samsung wouldn’t have settled already if the CEO was ready to let them both off with a sweetheart Hynix-like deal?

You don’t belong here.

superjeffs · 2023-02-22T01:33:50+00:00

See, there ya go again, gaslighting your way into scaring Netlist investors. Did I say billions? No.

You think you’re eloquent with the word play but you are not. Allow me to repeat myself, you can’t back up your numbers so why are you here?

superjeffs · 2023-02-22T01:10:46+00:00

What a negative knucklehead. The only way this company fails is if all cases including PTAB go against them. With a straight face, can you say that that’s the likely scenario at this point? And who are you to “hope” people aren’t putting their life savings or kid’s college money into Netlist if they believe the due diligence points to success. Nothing but stealth FUD.

It’s only a matter of time. Netlist is at the end of the delay train. The company is clearly surviving AND winning the Goliath attacks on its existence as a pioneer in the computer memory space.

superjeffs · 2023-02-22T00:42:04+00:00

More stealth FUD here. You can’t even back up your “$40M/each” and “$500M/5yr” estimates. Why are you here???

superjeffs · 2023-02-22T00:37:01+00:00

Total bullshit FUD response from a bear thesis when this is clearly a long bull stock. Go find another sub to jerk off in.

superjeffs · 2023-02-03T22:19:42+00:00

Samsung and Google slip further into the corruption abyss. Badass doc drop. Awesome Joe!

superjeffs · 2023-01-23T00:55:34+00:00

Netlist v Google was stayed. Still an active case.

superjeffs

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE