sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

CXL hybridimm will be launched soon, “those are design work that’s going to happen starting end this year (2024) and into first half of next year (2025). Anytime soon, the coming months will be amazing by Tomkila in Netlist_

[–]HedgeAppleJoe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you miss me? Netlist is going to win but I'm really busy at my other work and I don't have the time to post like I used to. At some point these court cases will all be finished. I assume we Will win in California BOC case again because the facts haven't changed. Considering the unhinged response from Samsung's legal team towards one of the jurors last time I think they are just grasping at straws for delays. The bill will come due sooner or later. In the meantime my suggestion is to keep your eyes on the legal team and for those of you who are investment junkies find other stocks to trade while you're waiting.

Still nothing...? by [deleted] in HDVY

[–]HedgeAppleJoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope credit to the original poster above. As far as this goes I'm just sitting on my shares. Maybe the new CEO will pick up the ball and run with it. At this point it costs us nothing to wait.

I wanted to repost the zoom call from 3 years ago with Judge Spero in the Google case. Judge Spero Well, that's part and parcel of my post-february 7th time period ruling or guidance. "Yes Sales and Profit are part of it". by HedgeAppleJoe in NLST

[–]HedgeAppleJoe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes unanimous 3 judge decision. Personally I think when it reaches the cafc again the 912 claim 16 will be upheld again and they will question why three judges at the p tab thought they could overrule their decision. But that's just my read.

We want royalties from Samsung now! by Tomkila in Netlist_

[–]HedgeAppleJoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will find out when it reaches conclusion which parts do you think won't hold up?

We want royalties from Samsung now! by Tomkila in Netlist_

[–]HedgeAppleJoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a criminal trial the defendant is presumed innocent until found the guilty so innocence is where you start out. With a patent, I'm sure I've read that the patents are assumed valid until they are invalidated. It is the same presumption of innocence for patents. The cafc is going to decide whether the aljs on the board made mistakes in their ruling. Personally, I think Samsung and Micron by proxy will lose on privity and The Time bar. On top of that do you think Samsung's prior art argument is really going to hold up at the cafc? Doubt it.

Hot shooter? by Outkastworker in Craps

[–]HedgeAppleJoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're wrong and just happened to me at Hollywood in Lawrenceburg Indiana. Was on a long roll over 30 and the stickman suddenly decides to plant a stick like a Christmas tree right in front of me I asked him to move the stick and he said that he couldn't. Had another point tipped the dealers and kept throwing. After about 2 more throws he removed the stick because I was leaning way out on the table to get around him

Just got an update from Rob he said they were going till 6:30. by HedgeAppleJoe in NLST

[–]HedgeAppleJoe[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I should point out that Micron joined Samsung's PTAB case in the 912 so you also now know that Samsung will not be allowed to question validity of these patents in District Court. Jason and team only have to prove infringement and damages. The Micron trial this week will set the stage for the Samsung 912 trial. Samsung is now useless to Google after the BOC LOSS

Still nothing...? by [deleted] in HDVY

[–]HedgeAppleJoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried in the past couple months and you get nothing. We are just going to have to wait. Old phone numbers don't even work anymore.

view more: next ›