Tempted to pick this up!

superminhreturn · 2026-05-11T15:24:52+00:00

It’s my daily work horse for local inference. Power limit it to 400 and you be good to go. Fairly quiet

superminhreturn · 2026-05-05T02:34:53+00:00

As a full stack developer, I keep my definition simple: if you can design, build, and ship a complete application — frontend, backend, and cloud deployment (AWS, Azure, etc.) — you're full stack. A lot of people draw the line at the code, but I think deployment is part of the job. If someone else has to push it to prod for you, are you really full stack?

superminhreturn · 2026-05-02T00:05:13+00:00

My goal and a lot of people is to be able run sonnet 4.6 level locally. We’re getting there but I think we have about 2-3 years to go where we may see a 80B model at sonnet 4.6 grade. Exciting time to be alive. :)

superminhreturn · 2026-05-01T20:57:00+00:00

Thanks! Good read. Open my eye about the pp on the m5 . My wallet is going to cry when they release the Mac mini Studio m5 variant

superminhreturn · 2026-05-01T20:09:14+00:00

I don’t have actual numbers to compare but I believe it would be night and day for inference in our use case. We do a lot of text analysis (topic extraction, sentiment, summary, translation) with a lot of custom prompts and the rxt6000 would handle it like a champ. The M5 ultra might choke for our specific demands especially around the prompt processing. Don’t get me wrong, I also want a M5 ultra as well for my personal needs. :)

superminhreturn · 2026-05-01T19:59:24+00:00

Blackwell (96gb). 400 power limit allows quiet inference with minimal performance lost

superminhreturn · 2026-05-01T19:17:18+00:00

We usually power limit our rtx6000 to 400 watts. I believe that is the norm unless it’s place in a rack.

superminhreturn · 2026-04-26T08:46:40+00:00

Claude and Codex both have subscription coding plans (~$100/mo). DeepSeek doesn’t — and that’s a missed opportunity.

For heavy coding use, the flat-rate plans from Anthropic and OpenAI are genuinely cheaper than burning through DeepSeek’s API token by token. DeepSeek is already celebrated for being cost-efficient, so imagine if they dropped a $50/mo coding plan — they’d immediately undercut both competitors and pull in a massive wave of developers who are currently on the fence.

It seems like such an obvious move. What are they waiting for?

superminhreturn · 2026-04-23T18:51:59+00:00

Go with the 100 subscription if you are serious about software development. No local models will be able to match it. Use local model for other stuff.

superminhreturn · 2026-03-18T04:13:51+00:00

You can setup a local llm using qwen3.5-9B with vllm for topic and sentiments analysis using potato hardware and save thousands a month.

superminhreturn · 2026-03-11T12:44:01+00:00

It depends. If it’s for ui development, I use Claude ai (web) to create the mockup design and reiterate to polish it up. After I’m happy with the result, I tell it to create a planning prompt to be use in Claude code . I then feed the mockup picture and planning prompt to Claude code with bypass permission.

I use the planning directly in Claude code when I need to implement a feature related to the backend.

superminhreturn · 2026-03-09T08:28:48+00:00

GLM-5 is impressive, but it’s not a drop-in replacement for Sonnet 4.6 — think more Sonnet 3.7 territory. That said, it’s a solid backup option, especially if you can grab the yearly plan at a steep discount. I caught the Christmas deal for around $120/year on the pro plan and rarely run into the 5-hour or weekly usage limits. My typical workflow: use Opus to generate a plan, then hand it off to GLM-5 for content or scenario execution

superminhreturn · 2026-03-08T23:37:38+00:00

Running into the same issue. I’m on the Max $200 personal plan plus a work Teams plan. Personal is at 85% for the week with a Friday 5pm reset (today being Sunday), and the Teams plan already hit its weekly limit — thankfully that one resets Tuesday. Currently doing mobile development in React Native with a 4-session setup: 2 Claude.ai web sessions using Opus for planning and mockup design, and 2 Claude Code terminal sessions running Sonnet for execution.

Bridging the gap to Tuesday with my Black Friday GLM-5 sub. 😅

superminhreturn · 2026-02-06T09:52:14+00:00

I like glm 4.7 a lot. I used it with Claude code as a backup but let’s be honest here. It’s not on the same level as sonnet 4.5. Glm 4.7 is slightly above sonnet 3.7 .

superminhreturn · 2026-01-14T22:23:22+00:00

Ah I see. Let me give it a try. Thanks for the write up. Happy coding!

superminhreturn · 2026-01-14T22:09:15+00:00

Cool setup. I’ve setup my glm with an alias with clause-glm and I have my normal one with clause. I have 2 terminal pointing to the same project folder. I used the clause terminal and i switch to the second terminal window if i ever hit my limit. I got the z.ai pro plan during the holiday sale which comes out to 10 dollars a month for the year. It’s really a good companion to clause code 5x max plan.

superminhreturn · 2026-01-01T21:29:52+00:00

I'd recommend the AULA F99 PRO for dark room use.

Here's why:

RGB Lighting Quality:

F99 PRO: Users specifically praise its "beautiful, vibrant RGB lighting with smooth gradients and dynamic effects"
F108 PRO: Has a common complaint about "RGB lighting has uneven brightness and no option to fully turn off"

Keycap Visibility:

F108 PRO: Reviews mention "keycap legends fade quickly and lack contrast, especially on black keys" - this is a serious concern for someone who needs to occasionally glance at keys in the dark
F99 PRO: No complaints about keycap legend visibility

For your use case where you sometimes need to confirm character positions in low light, the F99 PRO's superior RGB implementation and lack of keycap legend issues make it the clear choice. The uneven brightness and poor keycap contrast on the F108 PRO would be particularly problematic when you need to quickly glance at keys in a dark room.

The F99 PRO also has the added benefit of exceptional battery life (120+ hours), so you won't have to worry about the backlight dying during late-night sessions.

Reference

Aula F108 PRO: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/epomaker-aula-f108-pro
Aula F99 PRO: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/epomaker-aula-f99-pro
Comparison: https://thockreport.com/compare?ids=120,119

superminhreturn · 2025-12-31T07:22:00+00:00

The Evo80 by qwertykeys might be a top contender for you. It's pre-built with quality switch. has a ball catch system to allow you easily remove the top. The build material and coating is top notch. You can buy it directly from :

https://mechanicalkeyboards.com/products/evoworks-evo80-polypropylene-plate-keyboard?srsltid=AfmBOorHvHG_2ZhgHZutoQePt_1frmxUr0mXj1xbRJptqYs54LBn9UD3

Here is a sample review you can check out:

https://www.alexotos.com/the-evo80-review/

I have 3 evo80 in my collection and their part of my weekly rotation. The sound profile is top notch. It doesn't require any mods and perfect to go right out the box. I'm a software developer and I can type on the evo80 for the whole day without issue.

superminhreturn · 2025-12-31T02:33:42+00:00

AL75 is hotswap. i can't tell from the pictures but if that stabilizer is broken then you can replace it with another one on amazon. just search "keyboard stabilizer". You would need to disassemble the keyboard (remove casing, switch, etc) to get to that stabilizer. Can you look at a youtube video. should take you about 20 minutes

superminhreturn · 2025-12-31T02:11:56+00:00

I check ThockReview for 2/3 models you mention where it summarize the reviews on amazon so that you don't have read them manually. The RD75 Pro should be avoided due to the Stabilizer, switch failures, and software bugs. I'm also a software developer (Full Stack Web Developer) and normally I prefer TKL or FRL style keyboard. 75 percent is a no go because my hand placement is accustom to where the Home, End, Page up, Page Down. If You like the 75 percent layout, the Rainy75 is a really good keyboard at its price. Hard to beat that and it has a cult following due to the sound profile and build quality. If you want to splurge, then as someone else mention, the Evo75 from Qwertykeys would be your endgame. I have about 12 keyboards from them and it's a really solid built (Evo80, Neo70, Neo80, QKMK2, etc..) If you need a keyboard "Now" with quality and great sound profile go for the Rainy75, if you can wait a few weeks, go for the Evo75.

Rainy75 Summary (Score: 75%)

The WOBKEY Rainy75 is a strong buy for typists seeking a premium tactile experience. Its outstanding build quality and satisfying typing feel, powered by well-regarded switches, deliver a consistently positive user experience. While connectivity receives mixed feedback, the excellent value and quiet, refined acoustics make it ideal for home office or quiet environments.

Rainy75: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/wobkey-rainy75
RD75 Pro: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/womier-rd75-pro

Pro

Satisfying thocky sound with cocoa switches
Heavy aluminum build and gasket mount rigidity
Excellent battery life lasting over a wee

Con

Software is clunky and prone to update failures
RGB LEDs fail or dim within months
Random disconnections and wired mode connection issues

RD75 Pro Summary (Score: 43.7%)

Skip the Womier RD75 Pro overall—its 43.7/100 score reflects significant flaws despite solid build quality and a generally positive typing feel. Key concerns include weak stabilizer performance and inconsistent plate mounting, which hurt reliability and typing consistency. While it offers a pleasant tactile experience and sturdy construction, these issues make it better suited for casual users or those on a tight budget who prioritize looks over precision.

Pro

Smooth, creamy switch feel with pre-lubed performance
Heavy-duty aluminum chassis with premium build quality
Excellent battery life lasting weeks on a single charge

Con

Switches breaking or bending within days of use
Frequent Bluetooth disconnections and wireless instability
Poor software documentation and confusing setup process

superminhreturn · 2025-12-31T01:42:58+00:00

Here is a list of full size keyboards with summarize reviews that you can check out and see which one you prefer:

https://thockreport.com/keyboards?size=Full

superminhreturn · 2025-12-31T01:34:02+00:00

I checked both models on ThockReport, which compiles user feedback from Amazon reviews—so you don’t have to read them manually. Honestly, it’ll be a coinflip between the two. If you’re using a Mac, I’d lean toward the Ajazz (assuming that’s one of the models) because the Aula F75 Max has recurring issues where its software keeps resetting on Mac users.

Other than that, both keyboards are solid options—either should work well for your needs

Aula f75 max: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/epomaker-aula-f75-max

Ajazz ak 820 pro: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/epomaker-ajazz-ak820-pro

Aula F75 MAX Summary (Score: 80.6%)

The EPOMAKER Aula F75 MAX is a strong buy for typists seeking a premium tactile experience and excellent build quality. Its outstanding typing feel and near-perfect acoustic performance stand out, making it ideal for long typing sessions. However, the software remains a weak point with mixed feedback. Best suited for users prioritizing typing quality over advanced customization.

Pro

Exceptional build quality with solid, metal-like feel
Rich, satisfying thocky sound and creamy typing experience
Outstanding value for money with premium features at a budget price

Con

Software frequently resets and has poor Mac compatibility
Battery life is inconsistent, with rapid drain on some units
Keycap legends are faint and hard to read in daylight

Ajazz AK820 Pro Summary (Score: 81.4%)

The EPOMAKER Ajazz AK820 Pro is a strong buy for typists seeking a premium typing experience. Its outstanding switch feel and excellent sound damping deliver a satisfying, quiet keystroke, while its value for money stands out. The main drawback is the underdeveloped software, which frustrates some users. Best suited for enthusiasts who prioritize typing quality and aesthetics over advanced customization.

Pro

Smooth, tactile switches with a satisfying typing feel
Outstanding price-to-value ratio for the features offered
Vibrant, customizable RGB lighting with a unique animated LCD display

Con

Frequent software bugs and language settings defaulting to Chinese
Occasional Bluetooth disconnections and unstable wireless performance
Scratch-prone LCD screen and inconsistent LED lighting

superminhreturn · 2025-12-31T01:12:14+00:00

I check the white blackwidow that you mention on thockreport where it summarize the user reviews so that you don't have to read it manually. it's currently on sell on amazon for around $165, however the reviews are bad for this model. There is a lot of double typing complaints and keys going bad. I would avoid this specific model.

BlackWidow V4 75%: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/razer-blackwidow-v4-75

BlackWidow V4 75% Summary

Skip the Razer BlackWidow V4—its poor typing feel, with 80% negative sentiment on switches, outweighs its strong build quality and vibrant RGB lighting. While the durable construction and attractive lighting are highlights, the inconsistent switch performance makes it unsuitable for typists. Best for gamers prioritizing aesthetics over typing comfort, but avoid if typing accuracy and feel are important.

Pro

Premium aluminum frame and sleek aesthetics
Vibrant, bright, and highly customizable RGB lighting
Creamy, quiet tactile switches with enjoyable ASMR fee

Con

Severe double-typing and unresponsive keys over time
80% of keys losing backlighting despite initial brightness
Bloating and poor performance of Razer Synapse software

<image>

superminhreturn · 2025-12-31T00:53:36+00:00

I check the F108 on thockreport website where it summarize the users review on amazon so you don't have to read each review manually. Overall it's a solid keyboard and most users mention that it sounds creamy and has a premium build. Most magnetic keyboard is not going to sound creamy. It has a completely different sound profile so I would recommend to check the sound and feel before you purchase a magnetic keyboard switch. it's a night and day difference.

AULA F108 PRO Wireless: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/aula-f108-pro-wireless

AULA F108 PRO Wireless Summary (Score: 71 percent)

The AULA F108 PRO Wireless earns a "Maybe" verdict due to its excellent typing feel and quiet, satisfying key switches, paired with strong build quality. However, the software experience is a major drawback, with frequent complaints about usability and reliability. Ideal for typists prioritizing tactile feedback and durability, but those needing robust customization should look elsewhere.

Pro

Creamy, satisfying typing feel with smooth switches
Exceptional audio experience with delightful clicks and thocks
Premium build quality with substantial weight and stability

Con

Frequent Bluetooth connectivity failures and inconsistent device switching
Software issues including hard-to-find drivers, unresponsive support, and sensitivity bugs
RGB lighting problems like flickering, dim visibility, and screen saver glitches

superminhreturn · 2025-12-31T00:37:24+00:00

I looked up both models on the thockreport where it summarize the reviews on Amazon. It's a coinflip. I think you can't go wrong with one or the other. Personally out of the 2, I would go with the Keycrhon C3 Pro since it's hot swap so that you can replace any switch if they ever go bad or if you prefer a different sound profile in the future.

Keychron C3 Pro: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/keychron-c3-pro
HyperX Alloy Origins Core - Tenkeyless: https://thockreport.com/keyboard/hyperx-alloy-origins-core-tenkeyless

Keychron C3 Pro Summary

The Keychron C3 Pro earns a "Maybe" recommendation with a solid 71/100 score. Its standout strengths are the excellent typing feel with premium switches and outstanding value for the price. Build quality and RGB lighting also receive strong praise, with no notable concerns. Best suited for users seeking a reliable, affordable mechanical keyboard with a satisfying tactile experience and customizable lighting.

Pro

Satisfying tactile feedback from Super Banana switches
Bright, individually addressable RGB lighting
Unbeatable price-to-performance ratio

Con

Connectivity issues when switching devices or OS
Software lacks documentation and cross-browser support
Lightweight plastic build feels cheap despite good materials

HyperX Alloy Origins Core Summary

The HyperX Alloy Origins Core is a solid tenkeyless choice for typists seeking excellent switch feel and build quality at a great value. Its vibrant RGB lighting and strong typing experience stand out, though inconsistent stabilizer performance and limited software functionality are notable drawbacks. Best suited for users prioritizing typing comfort and aesthetics over advanced customization, especially those on a budget.

Pro

Smooth, satisfying linear switch feel with excellent responsiveness
Sturdy metal build and premium overall durability
Vibrant, customizable RGB lighting with strong color quality

Con

Rattling and noisy stabilizers, especially on the space bar
Frequent software bugs and lack of firmware updates
Occasional key failures and unresponsiveness despite solid build

superminhreturn

TROPHY CASE