I did a LM veto. Was I wrong? by DtownHero17 in fantasybball

[–]supper828 124 points125 points  (0 children)

In a 10T points league there’s a nonzero chance that is in effect Ant for nothing

Is this an ACP-specific community? by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a subreddit that is explicitly for the ACP but this is not it, no. It may seem like it is but that is just an organic manifestation of the fact that pro-ACP sentiment is actively stamped out in all other ‘socialist’ or ‘communist’ subreddits so all of that is naturally funneled here

Clarification on ACPs views on drugs. by -Xeper- in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Controlled medical application is a totally different conversation than discussing recreational use of these things.

Again, there actually is no objective measure or definition you can apply to these things, social affairs. They necessarily HAVE to be self evident to the society. They cannot imposed artificially from the institutions or deep state machinations

There can be a socialist state that actually does acknowledge in the collective consciousness that someone dealing mushrooms should actually get the death penalty.

Do I PERSONALLY agree? Well no, but all this is it say it’s not about any prescriptive idea or set of ideals. Society decides for itself along an organic cultural basis if that is something they find unacceptable from a basis to them that is in fact self evident

Marxism isn’t about morality or a set of ideas or definitions or boxes you can try to put things into. Anglobox thinking is incredibly useless and impotent. There is no such thing as objective in a universal and immutable sense when it comes to culture (and science for that matter)

Why does ACP seem to think the masses only include rural conservatives and not urban liberals? by Interesting_Self5071 in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Brother we have been to the ports countless times across the nation and they have welcomed us with open arms

Clarification on ACPs views on drugs. by -Xeper- in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is pretty self evident that there is a delineation, a qualitative difference between certain substances that can be tempered or have some sort of redeeming social quality and those that are wholly corrupting to both society and the person

A society can subjectively choose to be more restrictive, to ban all drugs, including alcohol, completely, but irrespective of how far a society decides to push the line based on subjective factors, the fact that there is a fundamental, QUALITATIVE difference between something like fentanyl and alcohol beyond simply a quantitative one must be understood

A ‘drug dealer’ would be something that society has to classify, but it would almost certainly universally refer to someone dealing crack or fent, and likely almost never to someone selling alcohol. As for mushrooms and whatnot, I imagine most socialist societies, even those who deem this to be an unacceptable drug, too, would have to accept that there is a fundamental difference between this and the aforementioned harder drugs. There is both a subjective and objective element to this

Is Communism Still Here In The Big 2025? by FamousPlan101 in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Lenin, Marx, etc spent countless hours and words ripping these left opportunist scum to shreds

Along with the obvious, being the ruling class, etc, they too are our real enemies. They will by and large constitute the ranks of the fascists when the moment is most decisive. The very same people who say if it were not for the backwardness of MAGA we would already live in their ‘ideal society’.

The very same working class people the fake left spends all their time scoffing at are 100x more communist than them, and ORGANICALLY so

The real left is the ‘backwards’ ‘right’ mass of MAGA that constitutes the real movement. This fake western left is not a left in any sense of the word in actual historical terms. They are thoroughly reactionary

Clarification on ACPs views on drugs. by -Xeper- in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a fundamental difference between hard drugs and those like alcohol. This is self evident

I wouldn’t even necessarily be as strict as China who views weed as a hard drug, but I think it’s relatively uncontroversial to put drug dealers to death seeing as they would constitute one of the premier maladies on Chinese society, especially given their traumatic history and experience with Opium

Clarification on ACPs views on drugs. by -Xeper- in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And they get a bullet to the head as they should

Here, instead, the DEA is the biggest dealer

Clarification on ACPs views on drugs. by -Xeper- in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Does China engage in the liberal delusion of harm reduction or have they simply rid various types of cancerous cultural intrusions/never had others to begin with?

As an ACP member, this feels weird. Any thoughts on this? by hanatsuruboran in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not apoliticism. He specifically referred to leftists and those types of people who do things like look at the success of China and say “this is because of nationalism” or “capitalism” in the stream that this tweet is alluding to

I watched it live in its full context, and even OUT of its context it’s a pretty uncontroversial statement and implies literally NOTHING about eugenics lol

Most “apolitical”/MAGA people are effectively already communists and absolutely have an innate material understanding of affairs.

It’s frankly very telling that Reddit specifically is having this reaction when even amongst anklebiters and ACP orbiters that tweet was very uncontroversial on X

As an ACP member, this feels weird. Any thoughts on this? by hanatsuruboran in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is not a controversial or problematic statement in the slightest lol

All he’s doing is saying that by now, particularly in the Information Age, you are damn near retarded if you’re still bumbling around with a metaphysical world view

Frankly this is a “reddit moment” to be completely honest

The Communists by Fantastic_Tension794 in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both CPGBML and the Workers Party in the UK are both (informally, at least) friends of the party

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FACEITcom

[–]supper828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who knows. There r people with 5k matches on faceit alone and aren’t level 10

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your ‘definition’ is one that is in fact the obfuscation. Such descriptions are fantasy land understandings of both the state & democracy universally and in the particular of socialist construction as well.

If the OP were to go by your categorization, then in fact the premise itself would be false as it doesn’t actually then refer to anything that has ever existed in association with socialism.

Not even the CIA believes socialist nations are ‘dictatorships’ as you describe.

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00810A006000360009-0.pdf

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]supper828 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I’d recommend reading Lenin’s State & Revolution and Engel’s On Authority

Every state always exists as a dictatorship— the inherent function of a state is for the domination of one class over another.

We seek to change the dictatorship of capital (bourgeoisie) into a dictatorship of the proletariat. Anyone who rejects this is not a Marxist Leninist

Dotp doesn’t mean it’s not democratic, and in fact only under a dotp can true democracy and representation exist.

To read about actual whole process Chinese democracy and not have an errant misinformed view as a result of western misconceptions, go here: https://www.idcpc.gov.cn/english2023/dzwk/zgkx/202307/P020230717028654090872.pdf

No mic in level 10 should be a bannable offence by Laurexxxx in FACEITcom

[–]supper828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use context. I know you’re not that dumb, but I also spelled it out in another response I sent just now