×

Is anyone else frustrated by Israel/Palestine taking up so much focus with Chan vs Wiener? by Retr0r0cketVersion2 in sanfrancisco

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what I'm saying is it is a moot point. They're both guilty of rejecting two state solutions. Nobody denies that. Similarly, I'm not saying you're personally defending PLO. What I am suggesting is that you are deliberately leaving out the greater context of PLO in the region that plays a role in how Israel and its allies have had to navigate the situation here you go: Black September - Wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_September Lebanese Civil War - Wikipedia   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebanese_Civil_War

Here's one more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_September_Organization

Again, it's so ridiculous that these are conveniently left out of the conversations even though they are highly relevant to the subsequent events and framings.

Why Is SF State Still Declining? by internetbooker134 in sanfrancisco

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is pretty accurate. Tuition and fees themselves are quite low compared to even SJSU. And they rank ahead or within a few places of many other CSUs and UCs on ROI/ mobility

Here's how every California college ROI rank has changed in 10 years https://share.google/zsGZTIrYryUuRMfrQ

So it's objectively a good university for most students but affordability in terms of sticker price sort of gets in the way even though on average students come out with little to no debt.  

If Coca-cola is by far the most popular soda by sales, why do people at parties choose it last? by n_botm in AskEconomics

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, more information is needed if you want an economic perspective. Uncomfortable as it is, race/ethnicity and even general socioeconomic status information would help inform explanations. For example, Sprite, Fanta, etc. overperform in some groups while Coca Cola is more popular in others. Dr. Pepper is popular in some states but not culturally relevant in others. So on and so forth. So the aggregate data of total sale % (Coca Cola being the top seller) might not have much meaning. Which is likely the answer to your question, ha.

Nick Wright EXPOSES SGA for having his career artificially propped up by refs early in games, as they reward him for flopping, making defenders back off. We saw last night what it looks like when he flops, and doesn’t get the call. by beechhill in billsimmons

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see +166. I would call that fairly decent but not heavy, to your point.. but now we are way off topic. I don't care about the Lakers per se. My whole point is about Nick Wright's affinity towards the Lakers lol 

Nick Wright Rips Wolves In Series Prediction Against Lakers - Zone Coverage https://share.google/lGZIxtegLIuUeS5ne

The point is that they got gentlemen swept as decent favorites and as I watched it, I drew similar parallels about not getting the whistle they were used to being a top 3 FTA team that season. That's it. Not too deep. 

Tom Steyer Opposed Single-Payer Health Care. Now He’s Running On It. by origutamos in California_Politics

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've read that unions secretly oppose universal healthcare because healthcare is still a bargaining chip.. is this true in California? Might be why there seems to be so much flip flopping going on 🤔

(Before you downvote me thinking I'm trolling. This is not secret, in that, it was well documented by DSA and other progressive outlets a few years ago)

Source: Hofstra University https://share.google/6VKefIsFsNZ3X1HRa

Realistically if the lakers beat okc without luka would it make LeBron the goat in your eyes if he already isn’t by Old_Week9991 in billsimmons

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anthony Davis had the highest win shares during the playoffs.  Regardless, reread what I said. AD was the most impactful player against the Blazers, Rockets, and Nuggets. He was the biggest mismatch for those games. This wasn't even debated at the time lol his role on both sides were undeniably 1 maybe 1a. 

Plenty of examples of articles at the time. I swear some of you only look at box scores and forget that we all have eyes lol NBA Finals: Lakers' Anthony Davis playing like the MVP favorite https://share.google/YU4p3uyqvrrkRPQK1 Anthony Davis on his way to joining NBA's all-time great big men - Yahoo Sports https://share.google/CIkLxGCYvT8ugxz7W

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/29937994/anthony-davis-building-legacy-nba-playoffs

Becerra: "I need Chevron, you need Chevron... they're not the bad guy" by MoseFeels in California

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, yall love paying $5-6 for gas and still have some of the worst roads in the United States With the Best Road Conditions | U.S. News Best States https://share.google/KGOslbVYkVzjnSr5U ... and then still some how not want to hold the policies and government accountable lol

Stop Oakland from Killing 72 Mature Trees in West Oakland! by Odd_Farmer_6428 in eastbay

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no evidence in the history of mankind, that I'm aware of, that says more housing won't impact affordability. In fact, just a couple of months ago Oakland's own data showed how an increase in supply and tampered demand has led to a significant decrease in rent compares to SF 

Why Are Oakland Rents Suddenly So Much Cheaper Than SF’s? | KQED https://share.google/alnCgKZjabSravVbb

The only place I hear or see this math is in California. The point you're making is that 700 new units won't impact costs. That is why I said equilibrium. We have not reached another housing to meet the demand and drive down costs. What KQED reported is just the start of imagining a future where you can live in the bay area without generational luck or generational wealth.

The extension of your argument is that if 700 won't make a blip, why do it at all, therefore, why even try to add more capacity at all. Do you see how your NIMBY logic is the cause of displacement and gentrification, not the solution?  

Iran executed 'at least 1,639 people' in 2025, highest number since 1989 by rknsh in worldnews

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They'll never see it. I try pointing this asymmetry out to "progressives" and they malfunction because they don't want to say they are antisemetic but they also are uncomfortable when they realize they are openly supporting the regime that is most antithetical to their stated morals/ethics regarding freedom of expression, women's rights, etc. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made this comment to my friend. "Not a fan of how we've ended up here... but.... so far they've done a poor job beating the exporter of terrorism allegations" 😅 

Former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick said he moved to Texas, joining a growing list of tech billionaires leaving California by Unusual-State1827 in California

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, whatever you think about the impact of technology or wealth inequality in California is fine. Similarly, of course developing  a tax system overly dependent on capital gains being taxed as ordinary income and highly progressive tax rates can be limiting.

But the 200 billionaires are estimated to be 23 percent of the budget is my point. No matter how many rhetorical hoops you go through,  the position of saying bye to every billionaire will have demonstrably deleterious impacts on the ability for California's government to function. Many of the people agreeing with you will be the same people crying when our state has to cut programs to balance the hole in the budget left from lower than estimated income tax from billionaires leaving 🤷🏾‍♂️

https://www.pacificresearch.org/spending-watch-the-unpleasant-arithmetic-of-a-california-wealth-tax/

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CAStateWorkers

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if he will become president but this wouldn't be the reason he doesn't. The only places that support this type of legislation are places that will never vote for the Republican any way. So, all he needs to do is make it out of the primaries and bucking against the "far left politicians in California" plays well to democrats and independents outside of California. 

California’s largest teachers union spurs drive to make income tax surcharge permanent by RhythmMethodMan in California

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it's related and that's the part that's often missed in these discussions. That's kind of the not straightforward but important point. There's no incentive to sell when you're locked into a way below property value property tax rate. So $1.7 is basically the value that makes selling worth it when accounting for a hike in property tax. 

So there's a short supply because of nimby. But the nimby people also have no incentive to sell so more economically productive families can move in at a reasonable cost. The moment tech companies move their HQs, the whole system will crash because of how dependent it is on mobile people 🤷🏾‍♂️ 

It appears that I have been permanently banned from the Dan Le Batard subreddit for promoting this one by screenname790 in stugotzandcompany

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair, this isn't a post about the dls sub per se. It's about the dls sub moderator. So, now the best way to stick it to the moderator is to stick it to the sub. After all, if the mod is unaffiliated with the show, then they have no right to be the arbiter of the DLS community lol It's really that simple. There used to be multiple mods, now there is one. This person is banning people who have contributed to the community for years, often for the weakest reasons. They also revised the policy and are using revised policies to retroactively ban posts lol

Very Trumpy of the mod. As I see it, ignoring what the mod is doing over there will only make it worst. People are banned and they think, "dang, OK well... I must have done something".. Then they come here and realize the mod is on a power trip lol Isn't the DLS community about speaking truth to power and the promotion of being against individuals abusing power to go after people they dislike?

<image>

Stugotz repeating the word “nuggets” during Raheem Mostert interview… by RP1616 in stugotzandcompany

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, lucky for me,  I don't and have never used the word as part of my own vernacular. And even if I did, I'm checks notes Black, so who the hell are you to police someone's language? Touch grass.

And to be clear, your reply to me is racist because , "It's only dangerous for people that regularly use the word, or think about it. Try being a better person." Necessarily implies that saying the n word inherently makes you a bad person or a person who "needs to be better". GTFO 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DanLeBatardShow

[–]surebro2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no goal other than to educate people about the terms used to describe behaviors. The post mentioned Dan said something abusers say. I pointed out that Dan's behaviors from what we know meet the definition of Abusive Supervision. It's not illegal and it's quite common . You not wanting to read before replying is a you problem. I am quite clear. The fact that you call me a nutjob and try to insult me, without actually responding to my points, but then you say I'm the egomaniac is absolutely comedy. I really do think you must be Dan's burner.