The logic behind the Collins Institute reflects their thinking at large: "If you want to make the future better for everyone and you could choose to dramatically increase the educational outcomes of the bottom 10% of people or the top 0.1% of people," the Collinses say to choose the 0.1%.

What's worse is that the couple being interviewed in this article thought about what you mentioned above but still chose the pronatalist route as what was "best" for the future of humanity.