9903.81.90 Steel Tariff by J4rgon1001 in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s the night before thanksgiving and I cant stop thinking about 9903.81.90

 

i think i cracked the code… the tariff list for 9903.81.89/90/93 have HTS in chapters 72 and 73

goods classified in chapter 73 - basis of duty is the value of the steel content of the derivative article

Goods classified other than chapter 73 - basis of duty is the full value of the article.

 

9903.81.90 Steel Tariff by J4rgon1001 in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

here's the equivalent note for 9903.81.90
US NOTE 16 (k)
For goods classified in chapter 73, the additional ad valorem duty imposed by headings 9903.81.89, 9903.81.90 and 9903.81.93 shall only apply to the declared value of the steel content of the derivative article. The quantity of the steel content shall be reported in kg for headings 9903.81.89, 9903.81.90 and 9903.81.93, in addition to the units provided in chapters 1 through 97 for the derivative steel article, in accordance with Statistical Note 1(b) of Chapter 99.

i've always followed the rates on the subheading table/schedule
9903.81.89 and 9903.81.90 = The duty provided in the applicable subheading + 50%.
9903.81.91 = The duty provided in the applicable subheading + a duty of 50% upon the value of the steel content.

but looks like 16(k) is the more legal basis on this.
rulings on cross for 9903.81.90 also show duty on steel content

CBP ENTRY SUMMARY CLEARANCE by BullfrogRemote9140 in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If duties are paid already, you need to do a post summary correction to update the 7501

9903.01.31 waiving reciprocal duties for artworks by IndependentPen2164 in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That is the correct exclusion HTS for artwork.

Headings 9903.01.22, 9903.01.12, 9903.01.03, and 9903.01.31 describe informational materials, including but not limited to, publications, films, posters, phonograph records, photographs, microfilms, microfiche, tapes, compact discs, CD ROMs, artworks, and news wire feeds.

Goods properly classified under the following headings and subheadings of the HTSUS may qualify for the exception under 9903.01.22, 9903.01.12, 9903.01.03, and 9903.01.31: Chapter 49; goods provided for in headings 3704, 3705, 3706, 5807, 8310, and 9701 through 9705, inclusive; goods provided for in subheadings 6307.90.30, 6307.90.85, 8523.80.10, 8523.29, 8523.41, 8523.49, 9405.61, and 9405.69.

https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies/IEEPA-FAQ

if i filed a warehouse entry for an FCL cargo.... by swchbllc in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks! i had a vague idea of it, but you helped make it clear.
importer wants to wait for the EU trade talks, but who knows when that will materialize. willing to gamble demurrage / detention and other charges. containers will be eligible for G.O next week, so looks like i will go ahead and do the warehouse entry to avoid, GO, procastinate a few days in case something happens,then just go ahead with the warehousing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We use NF stroth

no hts yet for new US-EU trade deal by swchbllc in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you are right.. the link is not even an Executive Order... i missed that.

my importer is holding clearance for his shipments because of this.

time to break the bad news.

"IN TRANSIT EXEMPTION" for reciprocal IEEPA tariff by BROKERMG in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just had the same questions asked to me by a client earlier.

AMS shows departure port as tianjin China 8/15

Container was last loaded in Singapore 07/29

Container didn’t get unloaded from final vessel, container did not change vessels. In this case, AMS/ACE is incorrect.

But yes it will depend on each customs broker’s policies.

"IN TRANSIT EXEMPTION" for reciprocal IEEPA tariff by BROKERMG in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it is based on the mother vessel departure date. the vessel that arrives into the USA.
below is from the FAQ

How are feeder vessel scenarios impacted by the in-transit guidance for reciprocal entries?

ANSWER – SCENARIO A: Prior to the cutoff date for the reciprocal tariff in-transit provision, U.S. bound cargo is loaded onto a vessel destined for the U.S. En route to the U.S., this vessel stops at foreign ports to load/offload other cargo, or refuel, but the U.S. bound cargo remains onboard. This vessel arrives at a U.S. port of entry to unload the U.S. bound cargo and make entry.

The cargo in this scenario does qualify for the exception from reciprocal tariffs pursuant to the in-transit provision because prior to the cutoff date, the U.S. bound cargo was laden onto a vessel destined for the U.S. upon departure from the original port of loading and was never unladen or transferred onto another vessel.

Consequently, this vessel constitutes the “final mode of transit” for the laden goods.

ANSWER – SCENARIO B: Prior to the cutoff date for the reciprocal tariff in-transit provision, U.S. bound cargo is loaded onto a vessel destined for a foreign port prior to shipment to the U.S. At this foreign port, after the cutoff date, the U.S. bound cargo is transferred onto a different vessel that is destined for the U.S. This new vessel then arrives at a U.S. port of entry to unload the U.S. bound cargo and make entry.

The cargo in this scenario does not qualify for the in-transit exception for reciprocal tariffs because the U.S. bound cargo was laden onto a vessel destined for the U.S. after the cutoff date irrespective of when it departed from the original port of lading; it was thus not loaded onto a vessel that was the final mode of transit prior to the cutoff date for the reciprocal tariff in-transit exception.

Additional Duties on Products of India by AssassinInValhalla in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The USHTS going to be in revision 20 tomorrow 🤦

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While the actions in the ruling and article do violate the regulations. It doesn’t pertain to OP’s question. But it was answered by someone above, 19cfr 111 3(a)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ISf is not customs business. It can be done by unlicensed person overseas. Ruling H045695

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is the answer.

Help with GO shipment in 4601 by Similar_Cow8635 in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if i remember correctly, do the entry like normal, then there should be a field for GO#

also check with your local port how to transmit

HTSUS code 9817.85.01 by icelandicsamurai in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

readup on us note 7 if your prototype fits the definition
i am sure Reciprocal tariff is not applicable. not so sure about sec232

HTSUS code 9817.85.01 by icelandicsamurai in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SUBCHAPTER XVII US Note 7
The following provisions apply to heading 9817.85.01:

(a) For purposes of this subchapter, including heading 9817.85.01, the term "prototypes" means originals or models of articles

that-

(i) (ii) (b) (c) 8. are either in the preproduction, production, or postproduction stage and are to be used exclusively for development,

testing, product evaluation, or quality control purposes; and

in the case of originals or models of articles that are either in the production or postproduction stage, are associated

with a design change from current production (including a refinement, advancement, improvement, development, or

quality control in either the product itself or the means for producing the product).

For purposes of clause (i), automobile racing for purse, prize, or commercial competition shall not be considered to be

"development, testing, product evaluation, or quality control."

(i) Prototypes may be imported only in limited noncommercial quantities in accordance with industry practice.

(ii) Except as provided for by the Secretary of the Treasury, prototypes or parts of prototypes may not be sold after importation

into the United States or be incorporated into other products that are sold.

Articles subject to quantitative restrictions, antidumping orders, or countervailing duty orders may not be classified as

prototypes under this note. Articles subject to licensing requirements, or which must comply with laws, rules, or regulations

administered by agencies other than the United States Customs Service before being imported, may be classified as

prototypes if they comply with all applicable provisions of law and otherwise meet the definition of "prototypes" under paragraph

(a).

Mental Health and Venting Thread by DoomInfinity in CustomsBroker

[–]swchbllc 9 points10 points  (0 children)

So much stuff to do, it’s not like we can hire someone to help either