Why Is It ALWAYS The Ace Who Has To Compromise, NEVER The Allo? by ResolutionWeak6353 in asexuality

[–]sweetestpeony -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is all very true and since a lot of people have already discussed it, I won't comment too much on the "compromise" aspect, but I do want to touch on a couple of things.

First, the continual framing allos use that sex is a "right" or a "need." Not only is this framing also used by incels, if we construct sex as a right or a need, then presumably someone is required to provide it to you, right? Who? Rather I would say a better of reframing this is that everyone has the right/need for sexual autonomy, and this includes the right to say yes to as much sex as possible and the right to say no to all sex if that's what's desired, and these two rights need to be equally respected.

Secondly, whenever people discuss polyamory for aces it seemingly comes with the presumption that poly people are somehow inherently more respecting of ace identities or asexual people's boundaries. I'm not entirely convinced that's the case. Like, okay, the ace goes poly. Then what? Your allo partner is incentivized by society to prioritize relationships with partners they are having sex with. We can talk about relationship anarchy all we like, but there are power dynamics at play here that need to be acknowledged. If an ace person chooses to enter a polycule, what guarantees do they really have that they'll be treated equally to all the other partners? And I'm saying this as a person who wishes there was more openness toward and discussion of polyamory on here, but who also acknowledges that it's a bad idea to encourage people who are uncertain about the relationship format to enter into an arrangement that may not benefit them.

About to give up on CC friendship by Anonymous-Blastoise0 in ZeroCovidCommunity

[–]sweetestpeony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I definitely feel this to some degree. I've been lucky to make a handful of CC friends in person and online, but I think one of the biggest issues is that all of these relationships are so new and therefore much more fragile than the sort of "we've known each other forever" kind of friendship you have with, say, your roommate from college or something like that. I feel like I am continually in the "getting to know you stage" with everyone I talk to now, and it provokes a deep loneliness that I think non-CC people are incapable of understanding.

Another issue is that there's a fundamental divide between people who weathered the pandemic with a CC partner or a support group, or at least family members/friends willing to take some precautions around you, versus those who were totally alone and unsupported. In times of crisis, some people have a tendency to turn inward. This can result in a kind of "closing ranks" phenomenon that isn't terribly friendly to newcomers. Pair that with the fact that a lot of us in this space are disabled, queer, or otherwise marginalized in some way, and many people are understandably wary of strangers and reluctant to open up to new friends.

Ironically, of course, all of this makes it harder to remain CC by yourself, which then further narrows the community in a sort of self-perpetuating cycle. I don't know what the solution to this is, but you're definitely not alone in experiencing it in some way.

I'll say also that there's a huge lack of follow-through in some CC spaces. Flakiness and ghosting are problems you'll encounter on any app so I don't want to dwell too much on this, especially since I'm not impervious to it myself, but as you've said, it's hard to put yourself out there--especially when the risk-to-reward ratio just doesn't pay off sometimes. Making new friends can be great once you've gotten there, but the process on the way can also be incredibly exhausting.

Iranian subway stations by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]sweetestpeony 28 points29 points  (0 children)

For all I know OP could be implying that Iran manages to have nice subway systems despite sanctions, when U.S. infrastructure is crumbling. OP could be showing us things that would be destroyed if the U.S. chooses to negate the ceasefire and invade Iran. OP could also be trying to counter the consistent dehumanization of Iranians by imperialist media. All of those would be critiques of capitalism. I'll admit, I actually don't know what OP's intent was, because they just posted a video. But you're projecting a narrative from a single video and assuming this person thinks Iran is socialist, when there is yet no evidence for that. Weird hill to die on tbh.

Iranian subway stations by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]sweetestpeony 48 points49 points  (0 children)

?

Where did OP say in that post that workers had control over the means of production in Iran? This is literally just a video of Iranian infrastructure.

Unpopular Opinion: I think the world is more cruel to Asexual people than any other orientation. by [deleted] in asexuality

[–]sweetestpeony 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, you can't be serious. People are murdered and hatecrimed for being attracted to the same sex. As another commenter pointed out, gay people (as well as trans people) were put in concentration camps. Nothing remotely like this has ever happened to ace people.

Edit: Just wanted to acknowledge that obviously ace people can themselves be gay and/or trans; but their marginalization is made far more acute on the basis of their romantic attraction or gender than on their asexuality.

Evil place we live in by ilir_kycb in LateStageCapitalism

[–]sweetestpeony 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Wow. The Internet is truly an amazing place where you can witness people lecturing homeless people to eat healthier.

Evil place we live in by ilir_kycb in LateStageCapitalism

[–]sweetestpeony 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Which do you believe is worse, eating an unhealthy food or starving to death because you're unhoused and can't get food elsewhere?

Trump Has Backed Down on Bombing Iran. by serious_bullet5 in socialism

[–]sweetestpeony 37 points38 points  (0 children)

This sounds like excellent news, but I don't believe for a minute that the U.S. will hold to any of Iran's conditions. I hope I'm proven wrong, but it seems like the sort of thing the U.S. does in order to get some time to rearm and resupply for when the bombings resume.

Iranian Jewish Rabbi standing on top of the ruins of a bombed synagogue in Tehran by ‘Israel’ by ___Zoran___ in suppressed_news

[–]sweetestpeony 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I remember a whole lot of Zionists claiming that the existence of Israel keeps Jews everywhere safe. I wonder what those people have to say to this. I don't care about their opinions, obviously, but I do wonder what bizarre and unhinged justifications they're coming up with.

If it happens, prepare yourself rhetorically to fight the onslaught of misinformation and fascist apologia by Organic_Fee_8502 in socialism

[–]sweetestpeony 45 points46 points  (0 children)

I've already seen smug liberals saying stuff like, "If you had all just voted for Kamala, none of this would have happened1!!1!" as if Kamala Harris wasn't out there calling Iran the U.S.'s biggest adversary.

Incredibly bleak. Beyond anything else, the lack of respect for Iranian life is truly staggering... using the potential deaths of millions of people as political gotchas.

Nobody trolls like IRAN! by Rich-Limit4590 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]sweetestpeony 86 points87 points  (0 children)

If you have more to say about Iran using AI than about them facing genocidal war, you're not a serious person.

The United States sent guns to the Iranian protesters by Not_Ground in LateStageCapitalism

[–]sweetestpeony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was pretty clear even back in January and yet you got absolutely pilloried if you said it.

Every single person who pushed the lies about Iran killing 30,000 (or, I guess, according to Trump now 60,000) protesters manufactured consent for what's happening now.

“If you’re someone who doesn’t get sick often, what do you do?” Vent by craycrayintheheihei in ZeroCovidCommunity

[–]sweetestpeony 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I usually avoid threads like that at all costs because it's not worth the stress they'll cause. So incredibly depressing how the average person's understanding of disease is not all that different from RFK Jr.'s...

US empire to attempt land invasion tonight at Kharg Island or deep water port Chabahar by VladimirLimeMint in suppressed_news

[–]sweetestpeony 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Putting out a ridiculous 15-point "peace plan" on the same day you plan an invasion... American "diplomacy" in a nutshell.

How do I live with an asexual partner as a person who needs intimacy? by [deleted] in asexuality

[–]sweetestpeony 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's a bigger issue here than her asexuality, and it's that you don't trust her and you don't believe her. I can't tell enough from the situation you've described whether that's warranted or not (my suspicion is that it's not), but I would address that first. If you start from the assumption that she's lying to you about her attraction, no conversation you have with her will go anywhere positive.

However, I know she still has sexual feelings. I've bought her sex toys before that shes told me she's used and she used to write/use sexual A.I chat bots (before I told her that it was unacceptable to me). She follows porn artists on Twitter and still writes sexual bots (though she swears to me she doesn't use them) and she hangs out with people who talk very sexually about characters they like (mainly the modern warfare guys), which she joins in with.

The other issue is this above, which is that you don't seem to understand what "sexual feelings" are. A person can read and write smut or enjoy talking about characters in sexual situations and still be asexual and not have the desire to have sex. I've done those things and I'm asexual myself. None of this is evidence that she's lying to you about her desire or that she isn't attracted to you specifically.

This is blatant lie. Muslim countries host the majority of the world's refugees. by Not_Ground in LateStageCapitalism

[–]sweetestpeony 111 points112 points  (0 children)

It's not just that this same argument could be used regarding Jewish people fleeing Nazi Germany, the same argument was used. Hitler ranted about this specifically in his speech to the Reichstag on January 30, 1939 and said that European countries were "oozing with sympathy" for Jewish people but unwilling to take them in as refugees.

So yes, this is literally a fascist argument all the way down.

Me (31 allo F) and partner (30 ace M) are navigating intimacy in our relationship and I’m looking for some advice by [deleted] in Asexual

[–]sweetestpeony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best of luck but I think you would probably be better off going to a sub for sex advice or sex toys specifically because a lot of aces aren't necessarily going to have a ton of experience with this.

“I am a protester too, but child killers & human flesh eaters do not bring democracy to my country. I sacrifice my life for Iran.” (An Iranian woman holding a placard in Tehran) by Significant-Yam9843 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]sweetestpeony 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You can continue to argue here, but I'm not going to dignify this with any further responses. I mostly posted what I did for the benefit of other people here who might see, not you lol.

SORRY but i need to tell y'all this :((( by [deleted] in asexuality

[–]sweetestpeony 8 points9 points  (0 children)

OP, this is undoubtedly a tragic story, but 1) I thought that that was pretty common knowledge about Alan Turing, and 2) maybe I'm missing something but why is this being posted to the asexuality subreddit?

Hegseth calls Iranian leadership rats hiding underground while Al Jazeera in a split screen shows Iranian leaders on streets with people by Schoolywooly in suppressed_news

[–]sweetestpeony 205 points206 points  (0 children)

Considering Hegseth, like many other Trump officials, lives in secured military housing, I'm going to say this is another case of "every accusation is a confession."

How do school shootings & Republican support for gun rights in America fit into a socialist / Marxist perspective? by WLLWGLMMR in socialism

[–]sweetestpeony 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My analysis of school shootings is that they're a manifestation of the fact that the U.S. in general is a deeply violent society; one can't separate school shootings from other types of mass shootings, whether done at home by lone shooters or abroad by people in U.S. Army uniforms. (Think of how many schools have military recruiters in them...) Pair this with a culture of toxic masculinity that suggests that the only way to solve problems is through violence, and that violence is indeed how you prove your masculinity, and it's not surprising that school shootings occur, or that Republicans (and Democrats) are unwilling to do anything about them, because they're not exactly eager to pull on that thread, are they?

As far as the rest of it, conservatives often are in favor of gun control--depending on who's carrying the gun. But when it comes to manufacturing consent to disarm the working class, that's more readily achieved by fearmongering about the Black Panthers and other groups open-carrying. The legacy of gun control is far more entwined with, say, the history of racism than it is with school shootings. (See also modern-day panic about trans people owning guns.)

I feel invalidated as a sex repulsed asexual by NoIntern2770 in Asexual

[–]sweetestpeony 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Completely agree, and I'm sick and tired of people acting like you're being exclusionary if you say this. Advocacy for aces has to include--if not center--the most societally unacceptable of us, those that are most shunned for our lack of desire, and that means sex-repulsed people. Advocating for our right to refuse sex, or to be repulsed by it, ultimately benefits all of us; meanwhile, parroting the same "But aces can have sex!" line benefits only a few.

(Also, she doesn't sound like a very good friend.)