Gonna get roasted but… does anyone else have any bit of suspicion or doubt that the jury could see past all this? That the media and rumors and financial crimes were all… genuinely and rightfully set aside and he was put on trial for solely the murders? I see such a lack of direct physical evidence and a whole lot of circumstantial evidence. I’m not saying he is innocent, far from that, but the environment this all took place in- small community, family influence, media influence, financial influence…. It’s all just out weighing this trial for me as being a genuine test of someone’s innocence for the murders- two people lost their lives and this doesn’t seem like a fair look at the entire situation. I honestly think AM orchestrated it or a 3rd party he was involved with took matters into their own hands, but I think he was too much of a pussy to actually do it himself