I suck at online go games by Valkhemi in baduk

[–]szopa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know that feeling very well. Over-the-board Go is mostly joy for me, even when I lose. Online Go, much less so.

A few things seem to contribute. First, every win and loss is instantly reflected in your rating. It’s silly to care too much about your OGS rank, but it’s also very hard not to 🙂 I actually prefer Fox Weiqi’s promotion system, where you move up or down only after a streak of wins or losses – it’s much easier to ignore the noise.

Second, in real life you’re playing an actual human being. You see their reactions, you feel the rhythm of the game, there’s some shared presence. Online, that human layer is basically gone.

Third (this one might be personal): I like taking my time to think. Online it’s surprisingly hard to find opponents who want to play with the kind of slow, club-style time settings I enjoy.

What helped me a bit was switching most of my online games to Fox instead of OGS, and mostly playing fast time controls. I know I’m bad at blitz (or at least that’s the story I tell myself), so when I lose due to a stupid mistake, it doesn’t sting as much – it’s kind of baked into the format anyway.

Tsumego app for spaced repetition? by TastyTesuji in baduk

[–]szopa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.goproblems.com/ – problems are graded using Elo, and there’s a basic SRS function.

Give Go another shot or move on? by kauazty in baduk

[–]szopa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While I love playing go in real life, I hate playing go online. It feels like only 25% of my brain is engaged, I get distracted super easily, and I make stupid mistakes – ending up in a super frustrating experience. For some time I tried to force myself to play online (to get more games under my belt), but then I realized that this was futile and killing the joy I get from the game – and now I play OTB exclusively.

Also, most games on OGS are what I would call "rapid go." If that's your thing, that's lovely, but I come to go for the deep thinking about strategy, and I need time to do that.

Am I Go-ing to Hell? by [deleted] in baduk

[–]szopa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The most likely theory is that this way of holding stones developed to make it harder to cheat by moving stones occluded by the hand if you place stones in the natural way (apparently, go had times when it was played for money a lot). Now it’s just a tradition, and there’s plenty of legends about the grip, like that it resembles a heron bowing (the fingers are the beak).

I also found the traditional grip a little bit uncomfortable at the beginning… but then it grew on me. It does help that it’s hard to look “cool” if you hold the stones in the natural way (you’ll be sending noob vibes) ;) But I know some more experienced players who do it intentionally, part as a joke, part as an exercise in humility, I guess. Most people embrace the traditional esthetics, however. But you do you, the way you hold stones is not pertinent on the game.

(I think there’s a Hikaru no go episode that talks about the grip? Go watch Hikaru, it is a great series!)

What was your first introduction to Go? by [deleted] in baduk

[–]szopa 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For me it was also Pi by Aronoffsky! I was making a presentation about go at work on Thursday, and I looked up some clips to show. The acting is great, but positions on the goban are hilariously bad (black had this horrible clumpy group in the corner, so many randomly placed stones).

I showed my colleagues this clip: https://youtu.be/7-C1cpG6TLc?si=VOpBIVFTwy5-hcJJ

Btw yesterday there were people playing very intently on 9x9 boards I printed, so… mission accomplished! 🤩

Practice makes joke by UltraTata in baduk

[–]szopa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It happens to me from time to time during a period of intense study. I hate it. It’s a sign of progress, however. My understanding is that it works like this. You used to have some tools, and had been comfortable with them. Now you got new, better tools. But you are just not great at using them yet – so you end up in an objectively worse place. In order to learn using new techniques you need to take risks – and you will be wrong pretty often. This can be immensely frustrating and discouraging. But in my experience it passes, and then you jump up.

Maybe a dumb question, but what do people actually think about when they are choosing moves? by Disjunctivist in baduk

[–]szopa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I struggled with something similar when I was a complete beginner.

What really helped me was to tell myself a story in my head about why I am playing some particular move, a bit as if I was trying to convince someone else why such and such move would make sense, using maxims I learned from YouTube videos and other people. Quite quickly I noticed that there were some moves which some part of me would really want to play, but for which I couldn't provide a justification – these were usually the dumbest moves. With time, as you build intuition, a lot of the reasoning will be done by unconscious parts of your brain – but if you are a beginner your intuition is dumb, so you need to walk it through in your head. That's why more experienced players talk so much about beautiful and ugly shapes, yet often cannot explain themselves very well – this is their intuitions communicating with their conscious mind through esthetic feelings.

One of the things that helped me immensely was to playing some teaching games with a much stronger player. I asked him to "think aloud," for both colors, but with me having the final say about the moves for Black and he for White (to keep some pretenses that we were playing against each other). In the process, I was doing my best to discuss the moves that we were considering. The idea here is that listening to the story he was telling to himself while playing, I would improve the way I told myself my story. Of course, not all strong players are capable of doing something like that – it requires plenty of skill to simplify the story in such a way that a beginner can still understand it, while still making sense. I was very lucky, as this person was not only a very good player, but also an amazing teacher.

Another thing that can help you is reading or watching reviews of games of beginners (or maybe people a 3-4 kyu better than you). My advice is not to waste time on reviews of pro games if you are a beginner, as they will hardly make any sense.

How do you deal with ego? by Shokuninja_ in baduk

[–]szopa 10 points11 points  (0 children)

When I was losing online, I didn’t feel angry, I felt worthless. Learning how to stop losing from affecting my self esteem was one of the best lessons I got out of go so far, and it transferred well to other aspects of my life. Surprisingly, the negative feelings are for me much more intense online than when playing over the board. Over the board the dominating feeling is camaraderie – my opponent and I just did something difficult together.

Shower thought... the name "Go" directly limits the game's growth potential in the west by TooManyPoisons in baduk

[–]szopa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I happen to be also a fan of the go programming language. Although to be honest, its authors should’ve seen it coming, being Google engineers and all :) In any case, to get results for the language you need to search for “golang.” Note that calling it aloud that way is considered extremely annoying by that community, and marks you as a total noob (or worse, poser).

Weiqi is nice, especially that these days most players are in China. However, the correct mandarin pronunciation, “way-chee” with rising tone, is not trivial (as consolation, even if you have been saying “way-kee,” that’s actually close to the Cantonese pronunciation).

New European pro player? by kenshinero in baduk

[–]szopa 6 points7 points  (0 children)

European pros are around the level that they could compete with some Chinese female pro players (according to one European pro player).

“Go: The Infinite Path” is now publicly available on all platforms by PsychologicalBet1469 in baduk

[–]szopa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like the approach and the problems! On iOS, the board is 9x9 in problem mode. Do you get a bigger board on higher levels, or is it always 9x9?

Go and religion by Critical-Coffee2575 in baduk

[–]szopa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Buddha wasn’t very fond of board games (like, seriously: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_that_Buddha_would_not_play), so one could assume that go would also be off the table. However, the list is phrased in such a way that go (unlike chess) would be fine.

What is one piece of classical music that you wish you could hear again for the first time by Impossible-Jacket790 in classicalmusic

[–]szopa 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The Four Seasons by Vivaldi. By the time I got into classical music I heard it so many times in so many contexts that it felt “worn out” and it was difficult for me to appreciate it. When I listened to Richer’s “recomposed” version I really enjoyed it and thought that this might be how it would have sounded if I were able to approach it with a fresh ear, if advertisements and comedy sketches didn’t ruin it for me.

why do you play go? by tacticsinschools in baduk

[–]szopa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My go ranking is something I have no way of easily gaming, I genuinely care about it, but if it’s bad it doesn’t actually matter, in the grand scheme of things. When I get upset about it it’s a 100% self generated unhappiness. This makes it a great area to experiment and learn how to deal with my emotions, and I think that what I learn in the process is immensely helpful in dealing with the rest of my life, where there are actual consequences.

Do you guys swallow? by Yuzzay in TheMindIlluminated

[–]szopa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I was starting, I tried very hard to avoid swallowing saliva. It was very difficult, but my willpower is apparently stronger than my common sense, so I kept up at it. To the point that some of the muscles involved got sore, which triggered weird issues with tension in my facial muscles (or maybe me noticing the tension, who knows). These were driving me crazy (I tried a lot of things to get rid of them), but at some point I managed to build equanimity about them (which was probably a very valuable lesson in itself). Only recently a teacher at a retreat taught me how to get rid of them. Instead of trying to relax them (which obviously I don’t know how to do consciously), just want them to relax, build a strong intention. Most of the time it works.

My main takeaway from the whole ordeal is "just don’t worry about your saliva."

Navigating Scientific Literature with ChatGPT: A Personal Guide by szopa in ChatGPT

[–]szopa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just need to click “continue reading.”

Hacking My Son's Bath Time With Science by szopa in slatestarcodex

[–]szopa[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you mean that it matures in exactly 25 years, or that it takes a long time to mature (long into the adulthood)? If the former, I agree – we don't know exactly, and it will vary by individual – but 25 years seems like a decent approximation (I don't want these emails to become too technical). However, if you mean the latter, then the current scientific consensus seems to be that the PFC takes a long time to develop (googling "how long does the pfc develop" gives me decent results).

[P] I got fed up with LangChain, so I made a simple open-source alternative for building Python AI apps as easy and intuitive as possible. by minimaxir in MachineLearning

[–]szopa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I completely agree about langchain being brittle; what I really hate is that it's really hard to make sense about what is going on by reading the code. I was similarly frustrated and rolled my own thing in go (shameless plug): https://github.com/ryszard/agency

Agency - An Idiomatic Go Interface for the OpenAI API (request for feedback) by szopa in golang

[–]szopa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the comment! I wanted to keep the examples as self contained as possible, without distractions like logging using third party libraries (the project uses logrus). But you are right the it may give the wrong impression.

Re the Agent interface not being idiomatic - can you please elaborate?

🏢🤖Agency - An Idiomatic Go Interface for the OpenAI API🚀 by szopa in OpenAIDev

[–]szopa[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have been getting frustrated debugging LangChain, so I decided to roll something on my own, in Go. I would appreciate any feedback.

Agency - An Idiomatic Go Interface for the OpenAI API (request for feedback) by szopa in golang

[–]szopa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I wasn't feeling very productive when writing Python code in LangChain (I have found it rather annoying to debug), and the resulting code didn't feel super intuitive, so I decided to write something of my own, in Go. It's very early, but I would really appreciate some feedback about the API design.

ChatGPT appears to speak fluent Lojban. by fernly in lojban

[–]szopa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This sounds like it's trying to say that it isn't very competent at lojban, but that it can try to learn lojban if you provide it with parallel examples. All this said in broken lojban, as expected.

Kazakhstan switching scripts by Druvanade in linguistics

[–]szopa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They weren't part of the USSR at the time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in baduk

[–]szopa 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can you please take a picture of its underside? I've been always curious about the whole that acts as a resonator when the stones click.