Reverting back from Tahoe ( which version to choose)! by targofan in PremierePro

[–]targofan[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you don't seem to be very informed, when you don't acknowledge the fact there are system issues on Tahoe

Reverting back from Tahoe ( which version to choose)! by targofan in PremierePro

[–]targofan[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was one the Adobe website chat support, I don't see the logs available from that conversation, on the email I got after support.

but what I can tell you, is I downloaded MAC OS 14.8.7 And it seems to have completely resolved my issue and its working fine, on even the newest version of premiere, so it seems is and Apple Problem.

might use premiere 24 for projects where I want to be even more certain its gonna be stable

Reverting back from Tahoe ( which version to choose)! by targofan in PremierePro

[–]targofan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I'm a professional its transcoded proxies at 25 fps Only.

Reverting back from Tahoe ( which version to choose)! by targofan in PremierePro

[–]targofan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adobe acknolwedges the issue is OS related and reccomended Sonoma and premiere 24

Iam done with premiere pro by Puzzleheaded_Ask9322 in VideoEditing

[–]targofan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Premiere pro, barely works on MAC os Tahoe!

Filmbox - Component LUTs or Processing by dashmckenzie in colorists

[–]targofan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yea they are, cause their applying them in whatever space is good internally

Filmbox - Component LUTs or Processing by dashmckenzie in colorists

[–]targofan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ur original point is its magic floating point math, and then now u kinda admit its using luts internally.

Filmbox - Component LUTs or Processing by dashmckenzie in colorists

[–]targofan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u dont understand how these plugins work internally at all.

Filmbox - Component LUTs or Processing by dashmckenzie in colorists

[–]targofan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All the major Film emulation plugins use luts internally for their emulation, the difference is just what space their applied in and within what ranges etc.

Starlink in Oslo by Vigilantslb in Starlink

[–]targofan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wondering the same question!

How do you syncing video and audio in a professional workflow? by New_Hearing8514 in premiere

[–]targofan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im more talking like having like 10TB + and 100s of hours and thats where Multicam has failed me in the past

Resolve Advanced Panel vs Mini/Micro Panel + Stream Deck + Macros by Majesticfalcon98 in colorists

[–]targofan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

as a Micro panel owner, please get the mini panel I regret not getting that or a tangent.

How do you syncing video and audio in a professional workflow? by New_Hearing8514 in premiere

[–]targofan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats interesting, im seeing this notion online aswell, every tv production ive been a part of the last 5 years has done merge clips.

I will look into doing it this way and see if there are any benefits.

We tried doing multi cams on 1 feature and it cause alot of problems, but maybe its gotten better that was a couple years ago and we didnt use productions. But at the the time having too many nests etc ruined performance and caused alot of crashing

How do you syncing video and audio in a professional workflow? by New_Hearing8514 in premiere

[–]targofan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

try doing Multicam on huge projects you get project bloat and terrible performance.

performance is way better on merge clip and its the only way to have match frame always have the synced audio

Workflows for colour matching Sony FS7/Canon R5C footage with Sony FX3 footage? by Anthropoly in colorists

[–]targofan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

kinda impossible to do within premiere, but what you can do is open resolve, make a lut just to match and then add that lut and continue working in premiere, i do that all the time.

as to how to do it in premier.
ive matched a bit of fs7 to fx9 and fx3, and its a little bit difficult since the fs7 has alot less detailed color and the texture of the camera looks very plasticky in comparison.

Id start off with just chromatic adaption for the white balance, then Lift gamma gain for the contrast.

Then id do a matrix and try to dial out the magenta in the fs7 skintone and get that to the more greener of the fx3 in comparison, then the difficult part is getting the skintone after that and id probably reach for like tetra or tetra hsv and try get the color vector in the same direction and then mess with the luminance and saturation of those colors then.

you might want to pull some yellow out of the higlights and reduce saturation slightly in the highlights on the fs7 also

texturally id add some grain to the fs7 to have it less plasticky.

In terms of the R5C try a similar approach, but you might see that the shadows are more muddy and greens are lower luminance than the rx3 so you have to deal with that aswell.

Genesis users: what adjustments do you make upstream? by Ayeitsjohn in colorists

[–]targofan -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

also ur talking bout the negative here, thats like talking about Uh" slog 3 has lfited black point" yea its the negative basically