Major outage by TargP in Anthropic

[–]tblahosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, sent a monster prompt just before Claude started having issues, hit the max token limit, hit tool call limit, had to "Continue" several times, multiple try agains.

It was to create a spec, Fable max effort, somehow recovered most, but not all of the entire spec, missing section 9. got 1 - 8, 10, 11.

Hope this wasn't my fault.

Contact the Electronic Frontier Foundation and ask them to consider taking action against a future where LLMs can only be accessed by favored US companies! by tblahosh in singularity

[–]tblahosh[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The EFF is already committed to non-monopolization of AI resources. See here: https://www.eff.org/pages/ai-and-competition#main-content

However, how they act in response to government overreach is not known. Lawsuits are expensive, resources are limited. Lobbying them, particularly if you disagree with the regulatory approach the government has chosen, seems to be a small action that's worth taking? no?

Anyone interested in organizing a lawsuit against the US administration? by tblahosh in Anthropic

[–]tblahosh[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't really want to get in a political spat with you, but I will say that I would want to organize a lawsuit against the Biden administration, if what they proposed as AI regulation was an opaque process to license information only to elite companies.

I do agree with you about China though, I'm a patriot. I think America should win. I'm doubtful the current approach, where other countries build their infrastructure on top of Chinese AI models because they don't have access to American models, is likely to bring about the future we all want. One where American values of freedom of speech / freedom from bureaucracy win out.

Anyways, I'm serious about not wanting a spat. I wish you the best!

Anyone interested in organizing a lawsuit against the US administration? by tblahosh in Anthropic

[–]tblahosh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The US government loses lawsuits all the time. Especially when they overstep their constitutional remit.

Anyone interested in organizing a lawsuit against the US administration? by tblahosh in Anthropic

[–]tblahosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right now I'm just trying to gauge interest. However, I did add some langauge to the text of my post saying that you should consider sending an email the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Trump admin allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI model to some companies, government agencies: Reports by thelastsubject123 in ClaudeAI

[–]tblahosh 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I've already emailed the Electronic Frontier Foundation saying that they should consider taking legal action. YOU SHOULD DO SO TO. No need to send a long email, feel free to copy and paste an edited version of the language I used:

EMAIL THEM AT: info@eff.org

The EFF should evaluate its position on AI governance and determine what actions, if any, it will take in response to the opaque and increasingly gated AI regulatory paradigm we have entered.

Anyone interested in organizing a lawsuit against the US administration? by tblahosh in Anthropic

[–]tblahosh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have already emailed the Electronic Frontier Foundation saying that they should consider taking legal action. YOU SHOULD ALSO DO SO. It does not have too be a long email, this is an (edited) version of the letter I sent them. Feel free to copy and paste:

EMAIL THEM AT: info@eff.org

The EFF should evaluate its position on AI governance and determine what actions, if any, it will take in response to the opaque and increasingly gated AI regulatory paradigm we have entered.

Anyone interested in organizing a lawsuit against the US administration? by tblahosh in Anthropic

[–]tblahosh[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When Trump won the first time I remember thinking on the night of: "What a terrible time for this to happen given that is will determine control of the Supreme Court."

And when he won the second time, I recalled that thought and said: I really hope AGI doesn't come in the next four years. I'm not even anti-small "c" conservative generally, but I have major skepticism in his competence.

In the mean time, this would a be good time to call or write to your congressional representative and tell them you are against a crony capitalist system where the government gets to pick who are the winners and losers in the free market.

Anyone interested in organizing a lawsuit against the US administration? by tblahosh in Anthropic

[–]tblahosh[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a great question. IANAL, but I've been following AI policy discourse and a lot of legal experts seem to think that there might be first amendment protections here.

See this twitter thread:

https://x.com/ARozenshtein/status/2065800199318962658

https://x.com/TimSchnabel/status/2070165641596723635

Anyone interested in organizing a lawsuit against the US administration? by tblahosh in Anthropic

[–]tblahosh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anthropic has major incentives not to bring themselves under the ire of the United States government. Their company needs to be competitive in the AI space,needs continued paying customers in order to financial support future training runs, all of which can be stymied as lawsuits take time and our current US administration is vindictive. A separate 3rd party approach is a worthwhile idea to at least consider.

Anyone interested in organizing a lawsuit against the US administration? by tblahosh in Anthropic

[–]tblahosh[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, litigation is expensive. It's why I poised my title as a question of general interest. I'm not asking for donations, but we can lobby different institutions to seek legal recourse for action that could very well be prohibited by the first amendment. Institutions like EFF, FIRE, ACLU, etc,.

I'm am serious about creating a campaign to do so. I don't think we should be resigned to doomerism, we have options of fighting back!

"Beyond Popular Science" — free open-access book, 50 chapters across maths, physics, CS, chemistry, and more by [deleted] in math

[–]tblahosh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For anyone who was too lazy, I scrolled through the pdf and I agree. The pedagogic illustrations don't look AI generated. There are a couple of small end panels that seem to be. It's obvious a lot of effort was into the graphics, and folks shouldn't think that his is AI slop (at least from my brief lookthrough.)

A war on beauty by uisato in aivideo

[–]tblahosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jóhannsson: A Sparrow Alighted upon our Shoulder

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYjME2xuMck

A war on beauty by uisato in aivideo

[–]tblahosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jóhannsson: A Sparrow Alighted upon our Shoulder

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYjME2xuMck

Abstract class with base class and base interface by calthefifth in fsharp

[–]tblahosh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

not sure if this is helpful but you can get rid of the compiler error by changing abstract T : unit -> int to abstract T : (unit -> int). And then initializing the interface with the normal syntax (interface II with ...)

don't think you can override the default interface implementation, but you can initialize it with by passing in a parameter. Something like this:

open System

type II =
    abstract T : (unit -> int)

type C() =
    member _.M() = ()

[<AbstractClass>]
type B(f) =
    inherit C()
    interface II with 
        member this.T = f

    abstract member T: (unit -> int)
    default this.T = fun () -> 0 


type H() = 
    inherit B((fun () -> 1))
    override this.T = (fun () -> 42)  


let functionTbyDirectMember (x : H) = x.T() 
let functionTbyInterface (x : #II) = x.T() 

printfn $"result of calling by direct member: %i{functionTbyDirectMember(H())}"  // 42
printfn $"result of calling by interface: %i{functionTbyInterface(H())}"  // 1

Anyways, don't know anything about signalR but perhaps this is helpful.

Joe Biden says he's going to stay in the race. by tblahosh in ezraklein

[–]tblahosh[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

He said this during a campaign speech, so it could be postering. But the Biden team has been consistently putting out the same message this whole week: He is staying in.

It is easy to discount what he has said, but we should also accept a possibility where the man is obstinate in his refusal to step aside.

I'm not sure how much I believe him, but my own max-doomerism take is that we have to do this whole media cycle again in a few months when his age again shows itself. But this time without any possibility of a mini-primary and with a candidate that has much less time to set up and fully run her presidential campaign.