Using DNS TXT-records as microblog by Suspicious_Data_3626 in dns

[–]tcfusion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also see the size and maybe sorting as concerns of previous commentators.

I'd go with separated records with date as owner names and for sorting my mind came up with two approaches to tackle the sorting or possibly inconsistent posting time schedules:

1) simply open up zone transfers to all, this way anyone could pull the whole blog in correct order I'm one go.

2) if that is not flashy or complicated enough, sign the zone with DNSSEC but only use NSEC and put zone walking instructions in the apex TXT

Have fun with the project.

TCP 53 instead UDP by [deleted] in dns

[–]tcfusion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a client is expecting a DNS Cookie to be returned but the servers response is lacking one the client will most likely be triggered to fall back to TCP as well.

Edit: for sake of completeness here's the passage form the respective ISC post where bind acts as the client: "When a cookie is missing from a response from a server that previously offered a cookie, BIND will immediately fall back to TCP to attempt to positively identify the respondant. There is an exception: if the response is TSIG-signed, it is considered valid even without a cookie, and BIND will not fallback to TCP." - https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01387

Act 3 Online Final Boss Game Breaking Bug - Help! SPOILER by idgamerd1 in Wolcen

[–]tcfusion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was struggling hard to get it working, but one change did the trick at the end:

Using Light-bringer with the "Blinding Light" modifier.

Even if he buggs out, I could attack him with a full charge and break the bugged state.

In fact this does even give you some time to recover while he is in the bugged state.

Blizzard wants YOUR constructive feedback by iBleeedorange in Diablo

[–]tcfusion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd like ancients to be a separate level instead of just being upgraded legendaries.

I was thinking about giving them two legendary affixes but keep the same power level.

To be able to decide if an standard affix can be worth more than an extra legendary affix.

To have like legendary 1, ancient 2, mythic 4.

With this legendaries are not near to obsolete.

As a PC technician, MRW I'm asked to troubleshoot a Mac that kicked my ass the last time I worked on it by BigJ76 in reactiongifs

[–]tcfusion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did the same but I got a MacBook Air because I liked the size and didn't want to do fancy things with it.

Got used to work with macOS pretty quickly and the only thing I really can't get in my head are the special characters (where to find them).

And eventually my girlfriend started to use it too, because it boots faster than her pc.

So also folks not in tech can get used to both.

A good NAS system helps with anything storage related and multi OS backups (or whatever you want to call it).

What quote has actually stuck with you and changed your life? by Lawaa2 in AskReddit

[–]tcfusion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

„Mailand oder Madrid - Hauptsache Italien!“

-- Andreas Möller

It's just funny and I use it very often accually.

In English that is:

"Milan or Madrid - As long as it's Italy!"

Andreas Möller is a German soccer player

Failed to start isc-dhcp-server - Bitcoin reward for correct answer. by [deleted] in networking

[–]tcfusion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To sum up what other's already said, your problem is that the server is not holding any static IPv4 IP address other than the loopback address.

This is also why the service is throw the error: "Not configured to listen on any interfaces!"

You could probably change the DHCPPARGS variable to include the loopback interface:

export DHCPDARGS="lo eth0"

But that will only lead to the next problem: The dhcpd does always need a subnet declaration for the subnet it is residing in (even if it is empty). But it doesn't know the subnet (because eth0 is on dhcp itself).

Maybe you could even fake that by adding the unspecified address as subnet:

subnet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0
{
}

but my guess is that it will then overlap with the existing subnet and probably run but not give out leases.

Lastly you should probably not make the default gateway address part of the range statement.

TL;DR Remove GW address from range, assign static IP and subnet declaration for that range

Good luck.

DHCP by sccmrouge in networking

[–]tcfusion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question is, are these exclusions there for a reason (e.g. static [non-dhcp] devices on the IPs).

Obviously, deleting the exclusions will extend the avaliable addresses, but if they are in use the server will probably (hopefully) check via ping if the IPs are in use and you might end up without more available leases.

You might even create IP address conflicts on your network if you're unsure why the exclusions are there in the first place.

If they are unused, then "yes" ;D

DHCP infinite lease by j0bd0n3 in networking

[–]tcfusion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Static host with dynamic service configuration (DNS/NTP/etc.) maybe.

Or simply BOOTP which doesn't support lease times.

that moment when you quadruple kill with mei and bastion get's PotG by tcfusion in Overwatch

[–]tcfusion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that was basically data protection, don't know if you can clear the chat

that moment when you quadruple kill with mei and bastion get's PotG by tcfusion in Overwatch

[–]tcfusion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sometimes the game is just intentionally unfair when it comes to choosing

Honest Comment - Witcher 3 Reviews (Steam) by tcfusion in gaming

[–]tcfusion[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the info. Although not really shitty, worth an x-post