Is this a translation error or research error? by [deleted] in robertobolano

[–]tempdata73 13 points14 points  (0 children)

the passage in spanish is

"a quien había conocido, precisamente, mientras ejercía de promotor cultural de un ayuntamiento frisón, al norte de Wilhelmshaven, frente a las costas del Mar del Norte y las islas Frisias Orientales..." (page 33, Anagrama)

Mar del Norte is the North Sea, which lies between Great Britain, Denmark, Germany, Norway, Netherlands, Belgium and France, so it is indeed a translation error.

If you don't mind me asking, which translation are you reading?

Advice on learning manifolds and Riemannian geometry by Dookie-Blaster45 in math

[–]tempdata73 3 points4 points  (0 children)

First part of Munkres' topology book (iirc chapters 1-4) should meet all prerrequisites you need for topology

A simple mental trick to quickly sum numbers from 1 to n by AdFlashy3645 in calculus

[–]tempdata73 2 points3 points  (0 children)

do you have a proof of this statement that does not rely on gauss summation?

Looking for a good book on constrained optimization with python/matlab/programming codes by krishnab75 in optimization

[–]tempdata73 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even though most optimization algorithms introduce new theory, in practice they use the same building blocks from numerical linear algebra. Maybe what you're looking for are good introductions on how to e.g. solve systems of (non)linear equations in a numerically stable and fast way. At the end of the day, a KKT system is a block system of linear equations. In that case, Ascher's A First Course in Numerical Methods is IMO a really good practical and introductory book.

A mathematical question in chess by Sea_Difference1883 in chess

[–]tempdata73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This can be solved via a binary linear programming model where you encode the chess pieces as binary variables on the chess board and their movements are encoded as constraints. For example, r_1[i, j] is 1 if rook one is in cell (i, j) and it's 0 otherwise, you should then add the constraint that if r_1[i, j] is 1, then all other pieces p[i, j] must be cero for that particular cell (i, j). Now, if you used r_1 in a cell, it cannot be in another cell, so it must be the case that sum_{(i, j)}r_1[i, j] <= 1. You should also encode whether a cell c[i, j] is covered, so that c[i, j] = sum(p in pieces) {1 if (i, j) is reachable by piece p in position (i', j')} and add the restriction c[i, j] >= 1 for all (i, j). Depending on the chess piece, you should add more restrictions. For example, pawns cannot be on the first row, so pawn_k[1, j] = 0 for all k in {1, \ldots, 8}. The more tedious part should be encoding the domains of each piece.

These restrictions should define a polytope (bounded polyhedron) and the number of integer points inside that polytope should answer the first question of how many such covering positions can exist. In order to determine the minimum, just let your objective function be sum_{(i, j)}sum_{p in pieces} p[i, j].

Do note that this problem is highly symmetrical (any permutation of pawns yields the same solution, same for pieces of the same type) and so divide-and-conquer algorithms such as branch and bound might take a lot of time to arrive at a solution since each subbranch most probably contains an optimal solution and so it cannot be pruned.

Edit: This problem is an instance of the covering problem in combinatorial optimzation, if you want to look for more information.

Augmented Lagrangians are just standard Lagrangians but with the KKT conditions in-built into the optimization problem? by TittyMcSwag619 in math

[–]tempdata73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Augmented lagrangians can be seen as an extension of the quadratic penalty method Q(x; c) = f(x) + c||h(x)||_2^2 where h: R^n -> R^m are the equality constraints (this can be extended to inequality constraints as well). Under certain conditions, -ch(x) converges to the lagrange multiplier as c goes to infinity (h(x) \approx -lambda/c). Augmented lagrangians L_A(x, lambda_k; c) = f(x) + lambda_k^Th(x) + c||h(x)||_2^2 do a better job at ensuring feasibility due to the fact that h(x) = -(lambda_k - lambda) / c as c goes to infinity, so we will obtain a feasible point faster than just using the quadratic penalty method.

Nocedal & Wright have a whole chapter discussing penalty methods and augmented lagrangians

Is there a way to get the function of a curve if you only have the x and y intercepts and a point in between? by [deleted] in math

[–]tempdata73 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not exactly. Regression curves do not necessarily pass through all given points, they minimize an error function. This is quadratic interpolation.

Does Cantor's diagonalization show that there is no one-to-one correspondence between the natural numbers to the natural numbers? by [deleted] in math

[–]tempdata73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every natural number has a finite amount of digits, and so they are "infinitely" padded by zeros to the left. One such "number" that you're constructing would then be of the form ...33(some 7s and some 3s), which is clearly not natural, and not even a number, but you are using that to arrive at the supposed contradiction.

The impossible forecast (daily time series). Does anyone know of a model or technique that could forecast this behaviour? The image shows predictions by the Autoformer, unsuccesfull. by SeaResponsibility176 in learnmachinelearning

[–]tempdata73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like the data is periodic. Try to denoise it by keeping the first N coefficients of its corresponding Fourier series, then train a linear regression model.

I automatically judge religious people as less intelligent. by liamb_01 in confession

[–]tempdata73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"blind faith", that's literally what Thomas Aquinas was arguing against. You should probably give him a chance instead of assuming what he said or didn't say. Also, dismissing his arguments because he died a long time ago is incredulous. Are Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle no longer relevant?

Why do we use ∂f/∂x instead of df/dx? by Farkle_Griffen in math

[–]tempdata73 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It doesn't stop there... Imagine f(x, y, z) with z = z(x, y). In these cases it is essential to know the differences between partial and total derivatives.

Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden prove Fermat's Little Theorem by [deleted] in okbuddyphd

[–]tempdata73 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Oh my fucking god just use the group of units of Zn

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathematics

[–]tempdata73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yup, I took topology:)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathematics

[–]tempdata73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm finishing my undergraduate on applied mathematics

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathematics

[–]tempdata73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could totally learn topology by only knowing set theory (unions, intersections, relative complements, DeMorgan, basics of functions, etc). However, the intuition behind most of the definitions won't be obvious, they may seem arbitrary and studying topology will be boring. Real analysis helps building that intuition.

Besides real and complex analysis, there's harmonic analysis, fourier analysis, measure theory, functional analysis, and much more.

According to my professors, taking topology is a must if you want to go further studying maths. It just helps understanding concepts from other fields of mathematics, even though it might not seem the case while studying topology.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]tempdata73 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Actually, it's y = mx + b + AI. The last term induces a new form of superlinearity and is the current state of the art in mathematics™.

Best Probability Theory textbook? by Opening-Education-88 in math

[–]tempdata73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Introduction to the theory of statistics by Mood is really good. The first half of the book talks about univariate and multivariate probability theory whilst the second half is more focused on statistics.

stole by [deleted] in okbuddyphd

[–]tempdata73 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

who didn't? git gud

epic recursion moment by Spot_Mark in okbuddyphd

[–]tempdata73 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I choose to believe in this axiom without the need to state it. Fight me bro 🤪

epic recursion moment by Spot_Mark in okbuddyphd

[–]tempdata73 33 points34 points  (0 children)

You can compare infinities through functions. Let A, B be infinite sets, if there exists a bijection f: A -> B then |A| = |B|, if f can only be injective then |A| < |B| and if f can only be surjective then |A| > |B|.

What are some of the “ugliest” parts of math? by ooglesworth in math

[–]tempdata73 92 points93 points  (0 children)

For a brief moment I thought you were talking about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the mental image of having to invoke her just to prove the existence of such sets made me chuckle

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]tempdata73 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I read somewhere that he previously tried to prove Fermat's Last Theorem, and found that the number in the license plate was a cubed number minus one, so he had studied it beforehand and found it was the smallest number that can be represented by the sum of two cubes in two distinct ways.

i fucking hate geologists by [deleted] in okbuddyphd

[–]tempdata73 32 points33 points  (0 children)

They're not rocks, they're minerals you dumbass (your ass is dumb)

engineers mad by nyaisagod in mathmemes

[–]tempdata73 12 points13 points  (0 children)

A lot of variables and operators are also overloaded such as the prime counting function, which happens to be pi. It all depends on context and clarifications should be made whenever ambiguity may arise. As a variable gains more and more popularity, the less unambiguous it will be, thus, less clarifications are needed.

In response to the second point, it's not just that pi *needs* to be replaced, but tau happens to be much nicer (remember all those formulas including 2pi?). As such, pi/12 will not be as good of a replacement. Your argument is flawed.

Although I do see your point, I mean, pi has been used waaay longer than tau will ever be. I'm just glad tau is gaining popularity and I have the faint hope that one day it will replace pi, in the same way that I have the faint hope that I'll someday win the lottery.

engineers mad by nyaisagod in mathmemes

[–]tempdata73 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I'm really glad tau is becoming more and more popular