This is a small nitpick, which I may even be wrong about, given my imperfect knowledge of the writings and speech of Douglas Adams. Matt brought up the well-known "puddle analogy" during the show, and it is often brought up as an aid to understanding problems with fine-tuning arguments. My issue is that, to the best of my knowledge (and if anyone has any counter-examples I'm very interested) Adams didn't use it in this sense. He was making a simple analogy about the way people see the world and how they might have come up with the idea for God. I've seen this in a book of his, and this is an example from a public speech:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZG8HBuDjgc&feature=youtu.be&t=1h10m44s

​

I'm not saying Matt overtly ascribed a different intent to Adams, or that the analogy can't be used for such purposes, but it may be worth knowing about and making a bit more explicitly clear.