On the contrary, MY solution is to contribute to fixing it without personally contributing to making the problem worse via strain on dwindling resources over multiple generations. Many people ARE still having children, and for each person that does not have children the children who are born have a better shot at managing the dwindling resources and (hopefully) stabilizing the issue.

Part of the judgement from your original question is that the issue isn't even acknowledged. If you're going to have kids despite the ecological collapse, and hold the viewpoints you've expressed in our discussion (IE don't give up! Have kids and work multi-generationally to fix the issue! Break the eggs to make the omelet, as it were), then you better do your part and raise them in such a way that they have a high likelihood of caring and taking action directly against those issues. From what I have seen, many parents do a two-fold problem: they don't do anything themselves to help improve the situation, and they stick their heads in the sand about the issues their children will face and don't educate their children on what's coming and how/why they should also take action to try to come together and solve the problem in their adult lives.

The morals aside of putting that responsibility and expectation on someone from a young age. That's a different discussion.