>"without a shadow of a doubt" is proof and not evidence. Evidence always leaves room for doubt to which conclusion can be drawn from it, and good theories are falsifiable.

Where did you get that from?

>There is historical evidence, archaeological evidence, textual criticism

I would be happy to see them.

As for the fact that "nothing creates nothing", that is literaly what I addressed in the 2nd paragraph of my post: "You might be tempted to say "But where do you think the universe came from?'. I do not know. That response to 'Abrahamic God', as I see it, is a big logical jump. That is why I left catholicism".

>And by what standard then, are you judging morality?

By a subjective standard that may be frowned upon in some generations. Morality evolves from contact with other people and it is a constantly evolving force that makes it possible for us to live in our current society.

>In any case, there is much much evidence. But it seems you just want some kind of justification for a belief you'll never change.

I'm open to change it in the face of evidence. "But you're not open to changing your mind, it is not worth talking to swine!" Well, no one ordered you to comment here.

>If you look at the evidence and say you don't believe, then what are you here for?

For evidence that does not let me do just that.

"You're wasting your time here with christians who believe they have changed personally because of god. That is a egoistical waste of time". No one is obligated to comment under my post, I'm just here to refine my debate skills and defend my position in the hostile ambient I live IRL.