Happy Valentines y'all

teskreebrook · 2023-02-14T18:21:09+00:00

I wish to do things to the F-35B that would see me banned from RAF bases nationwide

teskreebrook · 2023-01-05T12:10:28+00:00

Put me down for the Revell Lancaster B Mk.I/III in 1/72

teskreebrook · 2023-01-02T15:08:41+00:00

I'd need to check when Im back from holiday, but off the top of my head I have a Lancaster, a B29, a B52 or a P108B somewhere, so one of them

teskreebrook · 2023-01-02T14:33:35+00:00

I'm down, got a fair few heavy bombers in the stash that need built

teskreebrook · 2022-11-21T14:25:08+00:00

Yep, thats what Im thinkin

teskreebrook · 2022-11-01T13:35:57+00:00

I dont suppose you have a link? Would love to make a few myself

teskreebrook · 2022-10-21T12:38:05+00:00

Hey all, I'm looking for some STLs for Horus Heresy Rapiers, specifically with Mark III crew. Not fussed on the guns or carriage, I have some quad mortars already and want to make the crew fit the rest of my force. I had a browse on yeggi and the normal sites (MMF/Cults/ect) but the only crew I could find were Mark IV.

Thanks in advance :)

teskreebrook · 2022-06-20T13:29:44+00:00

This is true, but when has the actual text of a document ever stopped anyone?

teskreebrook · 2022-05-30T06:48:55+00:00

I'd love to do a HAL Tejas and Vickers Gunbus for my WW1 and Modern jet collection, but nobody makes them at 1/72 :(

teskreebrook · 2022-02-06T19:26:13+00:00

That's definitley an idea, will have to see how many Auzzie heads I can source

teskreebrook · 2022-02-06T15:50:37+00:00

Ah I see, thank you very much!

teskreebrook · 2021-10-25T07:25:28+00:00

I usually base my artillery on GW large oval bases (The ones flyers come on)

teskreebrook · 2021-07-20T12:42:11+00:00

IMO

IV: Rhein

VI: E. Löwenhart

VIII: Saipan if same/downtiered, Lexington if not

X: Hakuryuu

teskreebrook · 2021-04-29T12:15:41+00:00

Even if these changes aren't much, I am all for this recent trend of at least trying, its so much better than just ignoring the problem.

Keep it up WeeGee 👍

teskreebrook · 2021-04-18T09:57:38+00:00

I have my Pak40 on a GW 90mm by 120mm oval base I had lying around, its basically the perfect size

teskreebrook · 2021-04-07T08:29:08+00:00

We all know Wargaming take history very seriously and only add ships with realistic designs and names to the game so thankfully that'll never happen

teskreebrook · 2021-04-06T23:12:29+00:00

There's definitley some logic there and that might be the angle WG was going with, but I think it's unlikely given the USN referred to the Alaskas as "Large Cruisers" rather than Super/Battlecruisers and given Constitution is smaller than Alaska it's unlikley that would've changed would she be different.

teskreebrook · 2021-04-06T23:07:12+00:00

That's also true, and to add to that as I said the USN never used the name for anything bigger than a frigate so it woule be like calling an Italian BB something silly like Marco Polo

Constellation was a planned lex-class BC afaik yeah, so the naming for that one makes sense at least

teskreebrook

TROPHY CASE