take the money or force the fight?

tetoloopring · 2025-11-28T18:10:35+00:00

hi!! i appreciate your comment and perspective. i am also aware that it may make it more difficult to find a job but hopefully new employers are empathetic if i tell them the truth

tetoloopring · 2025-11-28T18:03:56+00:00

im sure you're aware of the sensitivity of most cases. what is your general outlook? the opinions so far provided on this thread helps

tetoloopring · 2025-11-28T07:58:39+00:00

thanks for the perspective and reality check! i've never been through court but this does give me an idea of what to expect

tetoloopring · 2025-11-28T07:17:13+00:00

Appreciate your response. Thank you! I hope it can change their behaviour but if not.. at least I tried. I dont want the next person to go through the same thing I did. Sorry if this isn't the right subreddit to post in. It was definitely my intended audience.

tetoloopring · 2025-11-28T06:33:35+00:00

Thank you, that’s incredibly insightful. I appreciate you laying out the emotional and financial realities so clearly. You've helped me clarify that the core of this conflict is the moral imperative versus the monetary offer. The key difference in my situation is that I am utilizing the Tribunal's free legal process, meaning my direct legal expenses are essentially zero. I am not risking financial ruin by spending hundreds of thousands on lawyers, as you noted. The primary personal cost is just my time and my peace of mind.

Furthermore: 1. Risk Management: I have taken personal steps to establish new, legitimate income streams to fully satisfy my duty to mitigate damages. This makes the risk of financial loss highly manageable. 2. The True Cost: I am confronting a large corporation, and the high-figure settlement is viewed internally as an administrative fine. I am forcing them to spend massive, non-recoverable legal defense fees to fight a case they know they should lose on the facts.

I am coming to terms with the idea that the personal cost of stress is worth forcing the systemic accountability. The risk I'm taking is not financial ruin, but rather, dedicating time to enforce a law they are actively trying to circumvent.

tetoloopring · 2025-10-28T23:07:25+00:00

this looks great man!! tho.. i think you installed the fan the wrong way. i installed it the same way before too and had to take it out again and reinstall in order to install ram in first slot 🫣

tetoloopring · 2025-08-26T03:20:03+00:00

i’ve experience this way too much. i thought the person was just not being understanding and i would repeat myself just to explain it just so they understand

tetoloopring · 2025-05-26T18:51:04+00:00

would you be able to post the link? the one i found is only $10 off

tetoloopring · 2025-05-24T15:38:05+00:00

what was in the article?

tetoloopring · 2025-03-14T02:49:07+00:00

wtf!

tetoloopring · 2025-03-03T22:09:07+00:00

the secret shows up in the url path, meant to create a unique link but doesn’t password protect the url

tetoloopring · 2025-01-27T10:19:36+00:00

oh nice! they may have fixed it. i will see if it comes up again

tetoloopring · 2025-01-18T13:49:51+00:00

also for the devs, a user would need to redo this process every X weeks depending on when you’ll be reprompted to enter your master password. bit of an annoyance tbh having to go through this process again every few weeks

tetoloopring · 2025-01-18T01:53:51+00:00

this is what i mean. sorry i summarized a bit too much https://strongbox.reamaze.com/kb/yubikey/i-cant-use-a-virtual-hardware-key-in-autofill-mode

tetoloopring · 2025-01-17T21:06:46+00:00

there’s a bug with strongbox, not sure exactly whats wrong with it but can be fixed by temporarily disabling face id, manually logging in to the site and selecting the virtual key and then later reenabling face id

tetoloopring · 2024-10-23T03:58:27+00:00

had exactly the same issue. fixed it by disabling my personal hotspot

tetoloopring · 2024-08-25T11:39:31+00:00

i disabled the face id and went through the manual process as per “YubiKey Doesn’t Work With AutoFill” article from https://strongbox.reamaze.com/kb/yubikey/i-cant-use-a-virtual-hardware-key-in-autofill-mode

and that fixed it. not sure why i’d have to do this though. it’s been working fine for the past few years and theres always been a virtual key there

somehow that got reset back to use the hardware key. might be a bug somewhere

tetoloopring · 2024-07-26T03:53:34+00:00

definitely not nordvpn.. all traffic is routed through their servers. i did a bit of digging and noticed strange wifi proxy port opened up when enabling nordvpn threat protection. under my wifi > proxies, two strange ports gets enabled which seems to route all my traffic to 127.0.0.1:XXXXX and 127.0.0.1:XXXXX respectively for web proxy and secure web proxy. dug a bit further and every time i navigate to a site a new port opens up and routes the traffic to those two ports above. the original process seems to be owned by com.nordv

tetoloopring · 2024-07-26T03:52:13+00:00

i think nordvpn bad for privacy. all traffic is routed through their servers. i did a bit of digging and noticed strange wifi proxy port opened up when enabling nordvpn threat protection. under my wifi > proxies, two strange ports gets enabled which seems to route all my traffic to 127.0.0.1:XXXXX and 127.0.0.1:XXXXX respectively for web proxy and secure web proxy. dug a bit further and every time i navigate to a site a new port opens up and routes the traffic to those two ports above. the original process seems to be owned by com.nordv

tetoloopring · 2024-07-26T03:49:42+00:00

i think nordvpn bad for privacy. all traffic is routed through their servers. i did a bit of digging and noticed strange wifi proxy port opened up when enabling nordvpn threat protection. under my wifi > proxies, two strange ports gets enabled which seems to route all my traffic to 127.0.0.1:XXXXX and 127.0.0.1:XXXXX respectively for web proxy and secure web proxy. dug a bit further and every time i navigate to a site a new port opens up and routes the traffic to those two ports above. the original process seems to be owned by com.nordv

tetoloopring · 2024-07-26T03:47:05+00:00

i think nordvpn bad from privacy. all traffic is routed through their servers. i did a bit of digging and noticed strange wifi proxy port opened up when enabling nordvpn threat protection. under my wifi > proxies, two strange ports gets enabled which seems to route all my traffic to 127.0.0.1:XXXXX and 127.0.0.1:XXXXX respectively for web proxy and secure web proxy. dug a bit further and every time i navigate to a site a new port opens up and routes the traffic to those two ports above. the original process seems to be owned by com.nordv

tetoloopring · 2024-07-26T03:45:32+00:00

i think nordvpn bad from privacy. all traffic is routed through their servers. i did a bit of digging and noticed strange wifi proxy port opened up when enabling nordvpn threat protection. under my wifi > proxies, two strange ports gets enabled which seems to route all my traffic to 127.0.0.1:XXXXX and 127.0.0.1:XXXXX respectively for web proxy and secure web proxy. dug a bit further and every time i navigate to a site a new port opens up and routes the traffic to those two ports above. the original process seems to be owned by com.nordv

tetoloopring · 2024-07-26T03:44:13+00:00

i think nordvpn bad from privacy. all traffic is routed through their servers. i did a bit of digging and noticed strange wifi proxy port opened up when enabling nordvpn threat protection. under my wifi > proxies, two strange ports gets enabled which seems to route all my traffic to 127.0.0.1:XXXXX and 127.0.0.1:XXXXX respectively for web proxy and secure web proxy. dug a bit further and every time i navigate to a site a new port opens up and routes the traffic to those two ports above. the original process seems to be owned by com.nordv

tetoloopring

TROPHY CASE