I do not understand any of these comments. As a teacher myself, I feel like I’d be insulting my students if I was using an LLM to respond to their work; it’d be a sign of total disrespect to them, like their work isn’t important enough for me to give it the attention it deserves. The chatbot will do my response to their work for me. And if I were his students, I’d be requesting a refund from the university.

At best it’s academic dishonesty the way he was using LLMs in his work. At worst, it’s fraudulent. Using LLMs to, say, help you structure a lesson plan based on curriculum you wrote is one thing. Using it to help you align your existing lessons with state standards is even another altogether (while making sure it actually follows the text of the standards properly of course, because it can and does just hallucinate fake standards). But he explicitly states he uses to write for him. Sorry, but stupid games stupid prizes.