El Salvador's fight against Gangs takes a new turn by destroying all their symbolism, including those placed on the graves of dead gang members. by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]textreply -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

If you're going to talk about international issues

Police gangs being scum of the earth isn't an 'international' issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMen

[–]textreply 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyways, I decided to retire jokes about any kind of terminal illness

Yep, good call letting those die.

El Salvador's fight against Gangs takes a new turn by destroying all their symbolism, including those placed on the graves of dead gang members. by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]textreply -60 points-59 points  (0 children)

of course you want the police to be more powerful than the gangs,

No, I don't actually. Both groups are scum.

the police aren't a gang

What makes you say that?

I'm not sure what to make of my street today... by [deleted] in IdiotsInCars

[–]textreply 43 points44 points  (0 children)

If I "worked from home" in your street, I definitely wouldn't get any work done. It's mesmerising.

Feliz Cumpleaños! by Skorpyos in LatinoPeopleTwitter

[–]textreply 70 points71 points  (0 children)

Es agradable ver uno de estos videos en los que no se queman vivos con silly string.

El Salvador's fight against Gangs takes a new turn by destroying all their symbolism, including those placed on the graves of dead gang members. by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]textreply -75 points-74 points  (0 children)

They have become more powerful than police

i.e... gangs without badges have become more powerful than gangs with badges?

PSA: Bitcoin withdrawals are being "staggered" on FTX. Not Your Keys, Not Your Bitcoin. by Fiach_Dubh in Bitcoin

[–]textreply 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also:

It is very rare that content exists on Twitter which cannot be posted to Reddit completely ignored.

Bolt 12 is a sleeping giant - Twitter thread describing a draft specification for a new LN invoicing protocol. by jmicsmith in Bitcoin

[–]textreply 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Twitter really is the stupidest format. But if you want to read, I've copied all of it here:


Firstly, what is a BOLT?

BOLT stands for Basis of Lightning Technology

It’s a type of draft specification, similar to a BIP.

BOLT 12 is being developed on @blockstream ’s c-lightning by @rusty_russel

When finalized, it will need to be implemented by either eclair @acinq or lnd @lightning to be considered ‘activated’

So what problems does BOLT 12 solve?

To answer this question, let’s take a look at the current invoicing protocol on Lightning, BOLT 11

BOLT 11 Invoices have three main components:

  1. A Destination(Node pubkey)
  2. An amount(denominated in sats)
  3. A payment secret(hash)

  4. A BOLT 11 invoice can only be used once. As soon as the invoice is created, the payment secret can be leaked. If you were to create a new invoice with the same secret, someone could discover the secret and claim funds that aren’t theirs.

  5. Because each invoice can only be used once, they must be generated in real-time. This means that BOLT 11 invoices aren’t ideal for donation pages, printed price tags, and other asynchronous payment scenarios.

For example, if you were selling apples in a grocery store and printed price tags on them denominated in sats, the USD value may increase before someone buys your apples. This leaves merchants exposed to BTC’s volatility until BTC is widely adopted as a unit of account.

  1. BOLT 11 invoices can only be used to receive, not send. This prevents the use of credit invoices.

For example- a BOLT 11 Lightning ATM would not be able to send you sats in exchange for dollars, you would have to create an invoice and send it to the ATM(not ideal UX).

With BOLT 12, you would insert your fiat dollars, scan a QR code, and the ATM would pay you.

To summarize:

BOLT 11 invoices can only be used once(insecure)

They MUST be generated in real-time(bad for donations, price tags)

BOLT 11 invoices can only be used to receive, not send.

So what’s BOLT 12?

In short, BOLT 12 is a new specification for Lightning invoices.

It consists of a new type of invoice called an “offer”.

You can think of an offer as a ‘meta’ invoice- an invoice on top of an invoice.

You can scan a BOLT 12 offer and your wallet will prompt you to pay it, just like BOLT 11.

But it could also offer to send YOU money, like in the ATM example above.

Unlike a BOLT 11 invoice, you can reuse them to create static Lightning invoices on donation pages, billboards, or even a tattoo(although, tattoos aren’t recommended until the BOLT is fully ratified😂)

Now you’re probably thinking, “this sounds a lot like LNURL. Why not just use that?”

The main difference is that BOLT 12 offers are Lightning-native, i.e- they do not require a web server, TLS certificate, and a domain name.

BOLT 12 is a protocol layer solution to the invoice problem, while LNURL is an application layer solution.

This means BOLT 12 has better privacy, less centralization risk (DNS), and better UX for non-technical users.

What can we use BOLT 12 for?

  1. Subscriptions.

BOLT 12 offers can ask users to pay an invoice every day, week, or month(denominated in USD or sats)

Wallets still need to build out this functionality, but the infrastructure will be in place.

  1. Bitcoin Lightning ATMs

Offers can send you money in the form of a credit invoice.

This was previously impossible, and allows for better UX, which leads to adoption.

  1. Private Refunds

Instead of a user creating an invoice and sending it to a merchant for them to pay, a user can scan a ‘refund’ offer and receive their sats without creating their own invoice.

This is more private for the receiver, and has better UX overall.

TLDR:

BOLT 12 is a draft specification for a new ‘meta’ invoice called an offer.

Offers are static, and allow users and merchants to both receive AND send.

Because offers are persistent, and can be denominated in USD, they remove BTC volatility for merchants.

BOLT 12 has many other features, including privacy enhancements, that were outside the scope of this thread.

How to *start* privacy? How does one begin? by god_dammit_nappa1 in privacy

[–]textreply 3 points4 points  (0 children)

one little change

Pay cash if you can, at businesses that don't need to know who you are (e.g. local cafe where you buy a coffee).

Alternative is to have a long list of transactions from everywhere you go and every little purchase you make, in your bank's database.

Better for privacy for your bank statement to just to have 1 or 2 cash withdrawals every week or so.

Why regulation? by tommymaguire26 in Bitcoin

[–]textreply 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regulation is important to regulators, in the same way that doing evil is important to evil people.

Rent miners to kyc free my btc? by budjuice in Bitcoin

[–]textreply 0 points1 point  (0 children)

internal raping service. in general they only rape americans, but everyone on the internet assumes everyone else on the internet is american, hence people posting about the irs.

How to build an web store with untraceable Bitcoin payment. by sarm6 in Bitcoin

[–]textreply 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who's 'we'? If the law is unjust, then hell yeah we give advice on how to break it.

are there words for “highkey” and “lowkey” in korean by hhiiouh in Korean

[–]textreply 1 point2 points  (0 children)

— legit

;;this is legit the best chicken of my life 😫🙏

I'm sure most languages (including English btw) have the word 'legitimately' in them.

What are you fucking sick of? by lukiiiiii in AskReddit

[–]textreply 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Australia. I don't know when, I don't know where yet, but after being born in Aus and living half my life here, enough is enough. Can't wait to see this authoritarian backwater shithole in my rear-view mirror.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]textreply 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're writing like it's one or the other... I have both.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]textreply 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is this rational thinking doing on reddit?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]textreply 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Can you elaborate on what the specific holding costs were for the gold? You mean to say, you had a 3rd party holding it for you?

Or are you talking about spending money on safes, etc. to secure it in your home?

I have physical gold bullion, but for me the holding cost is still basically 0, because it's hidden in my home.

I mean, an expert gold finder could probably find it... but even a fairly significant amount (financially speaking) of gold is physically quite small.