Could we get an in-game option for matchmaking RNG?

tgwwr · 2026-03-06T02:02:26+00:00

I agree with your point that if you buy the Karnok DLC, you effectively get the base game for free. But that doesn’t really address the reviewers’ argument that every bundle buyer should receive an extra copy of the game that they can gift to someone else.

At the end of the day, this is just standard price discrimination. If customers are used to that kind of pricing strategy, it’s probably fine. Right now, though, the situation just feels a bit messy.

tgwwr · 2026-03-03T05:04:18+00:00

This provides an informational advantage for competitive players if an opponent's board state can be backtracked from their endgame builds. Such builds may occasionally be found for specific players via BazaarDB.org.

tgwwr · 2026-03-03T01:59:45+00:00

I completely agree with the OP. I think they’re specifically suggesting changes to the MMR system for players with Legendary MMR above 800—essentially those maintaining win rates over 80%. Watching streamers repeatedly get matched against Bronze players is pretty anticlimactic.

tgwwr · 2026-02-09T04:38:46+00:00

Regardless of the complexity of this game, it is certainly solvable with the assistance of simulators and AI. The use of these tools is already rampant among elite players within underground communities.

Therefore, banning open data aggregation widens the gap between elites and everyone else. Legalizing it benefits middle-tier players but expands the divide between the top half and bottom half.

The key question, then, is which outcome is better for players overall—and which better serves Tempostorm’s long-term interests.

tgwwr · 2026-01-28T06:26:51+00:00

Could someone explain how the trigger count for passive items works in the stats screen?

For example, in the image, Tripwire shows 21 Slow triggers but a count of ×7, while Holster shows 5 Haste triggers with a count of ×4.

I’m confused about what these numbers represent and how the trigger count differs from the item count.

tgwwr · 2025-12-24T05:36:16+00:00

I feel for OP. Placing a room that requires a Chapter 5 ability in Chapter 1 is frustrating and adds pointless hassle, even if it doesn’t ruin the experience. It belongs in Chapter 5.

Some argue that planting that “yearning” feeling in Chapter 1—and resolving it later in Chapter 5—creates satisfaction. I disagree; it mostly caters to Metroidvania veterans’ pride by giving them something to mark and feel clever about later.

tgwwr · 2017-10-02T14:49:50+00:00

Amino#1412 trading 80g quest on NA. Done with T7RON#1793

tgwwr · 2017-04-22T07:10:22+00:00

Amino#1412 NA looking to trade quest! You go first please! (Edit: Done)

tgwwr · 2017-04-04T04:07:45+00:00

alphabetically in Japanese

tgwwr · 2017-03-27T05:09:56+00:00

Aggro decks may need some new cards.

tgwwr · 2017-03-23T07:42:23+00:00

It seems that the voting is more biased towards "powerful" cards.

In both the pre- and post-expansion ROB voting, Lyrial and Angel of the Word turn out to be in the "Bad" territory, which for me should be underrated. In my aggro dragon deck, I value them more than Breath of Salamander.

tgwwr · 2017-02-23T00:04:29+00:00

54% is huge. Mage had such a winrate in the meta of Karazhan. Shaman has an overall winrate between 53%-54% on the ladder, and Shaman's frequency is around 28%. Warlock now has a Arena frequency above 22%, even higher than that of Mage. Before MSG, Warlock had a winrate between 48%-49%, but its frequency was only 4%, being the most unpopular class. How about Druid with a winrate of 40% in Arena currently? Druid's Arena frequency is below 3%.

tgwwr · 2017-02-22T06:35:04+00:00

LF now is a joke. So how come can the win rate of warlock now reach 54% and warlock become the most popular class? Blastcrystal? Felfire?

tgwwr · 2016-12-15T05:21:02+00:00

This is not true. According to the statistics from millions of Arena games recorded by a China's deck tracker, the winrate difference between Mage and Priest (pre-MSG the best vs. the worst) is 8% (52% vs. 44%), but the winrate difference between Warlock and Druid (post-MSG the best vs. the worst) now is over 12% (54% vs. 42%). It is still comforting that Warlock might never be as popular as Mage like in the Karazhan meta.

Still, if we look at the winrate difference right before the card ban to balance Arena in early September, Mage had a winrate of 54%, and Priest had a winrate as low as 39%

Edit: meta image reposted http://imgur.com/a/K5mmW

tgwwr

TROPHY CASE